- 8,997
- 9,718
They disagreed with the basic question I asked. I brought up none of these next points to them because it's hard to comment on mobileWell the thing is, the calc group members disagreed with him and much preferred the sketch. 2 calc members, not just one. So his way on the matter holds even less weight and his arguments about large size type 3 and 4 as stated below:
You can still see the width of the tornado and there are blue lines coming from the sides of it that travel back to Retakka, so it clearly doesn't have a width that stretches out kilometres. And this tornado is also clearly a lot thinner and cylindrical compared to the ones that you calced
And I've already addressed that while the true base and height of the tornado isn't fully shown, the size of its width compared to Retakka is very clearly shownit's not like all tornadoes are necessarily the same size
Last edited: