Add a Dimensionality section to profiles.

[Deidalius]

I agree with OP. Other wikis do it and we should do it too.

We should do it because I've seen some dumbasses say Goku is immune to absolutely all 3D haxes just because they scaled Goku to 4D.

 

[PrinceofPein]

I think it should be compulsory for new tier 1 profiles or new revisions for profiles tbh.

It is already in the AP section for tier 1 profiles and in the justification, so again it cannot be compulsory

It is towards abilities and despite being added, it hasn't been used cause it was too annoying to do so. This is a much easier method, and can still be non-compulsory.

Adding Dimensionality:

Right at the top of a profile near the Tier Section is a lot better than having to go through blog pages, or search through their powers and abilities.

We have a standard page format, the moment you add that it becomes compulsory, again it is recommended that it be added to the page already, and on most pages it is there in the AP already

 

[BasedNecoScaler69]

It is already in the AP section for tier 1 profiles and in the justification, so again it cannot be compulsory

We have a standard page format, the moment you add that it becomes compulsory, again it is recommended that it be added to the page already, and on most pages it is there in the AP already

I've seen a lot of t1 pages without their dimensionality explicitly stated.

 

[PrinceofPein]

I've seen a lot of t1 pages without their dimensionality explicitly stated.

And I have seen a lot that it is directly stated too. And those ones that are not stated, most of them you can imply the dimensionality from the AP rating, or they are not physically that tier just that they have feats/abilities on that level

 

[CurrySenpai]

Also wonder why this isnt in staff discussion

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

We have a standard page format, the moment you add that it becomes compulsory, again it is recommended that it be added to the page already, and on most pages it is there in the AP already

Which?

 

[BasedNecoScaler69]

Also wonder why this isnt in staff discussion

i need permission

 

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

I agree with this as well, although it should obviously only apply to tier 1 profiles or those with tier 1 smurf hax.

 

[Hiryu-Z]

I agree

 

[Robo432343]

hold on. What if a character is Low 1-C for example but does not have HDE??

 

[Rakih_Elyan]

Yeah, some profile like Sun Wukong have a vague dimensionality lol.

 

[Rakih_Elyan]

hold on. What if a character is Low 1-C for example but does not have HDE??

Still count to what D his Low 1-C AP.

 

[Greatsage13th]

Agreed

 

[ImmortalDread]

I agree with this as well, although it should obviously only apply to tier 1 profiles or those with tier 1 smurf hax.

No, their dimensionality has nothing to do with AP

 

[Lewis]

I propose that the dimension be at the front of Ap in the character profile

example

Attack Potency: Low Complex Multiverse level (5D): ......

 

[ImmortalDread]

Why is AP here relevant? Someone enlighten me

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

When we say Dimensionality, are we referring to their existence or their stats? Cause you can be a 6D Existence, or you can just have 6D Stats, or just have 6D Smurf Hax.

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

I was proposing that their stats, and smurf abilities be listed in a Dimensionality: just as the OP did, as it's simpilier.

Attack Potency: Low Complex Multiverse level (5D): ......

This is unnecessary, if everything can just be summed up in a Dimensionality section. Plus going through a profile and adding that to statistics and abilities, is more work in comparison.

 

[ImmortalDread]

When we say Dimensionality, are we referring to their existence or their stats? Cause you can be a 6D Existence, or you can just have 6D Stats, or just have 6D Smurf Hax.

Ya my point

 

[Antvasima]

This seems to require far too much work, as we would have to investigate the nature of and add new sections to every single character in this wiki for extremely limited payoff. My apologies.

However, the characters with higher- or lower-dimensional nature are still usually rather easy to discern from their tiers and if they have this ability listed.

 

[StorytellingDemonKing]

This seems to require far too much work, as we would have to investigate the nature of and add new sections to every single character in this wiki for extremely limited payoff. My apologies.

However, the characters with higher- or lower-dimensional nature are still usually rather easy to discern from their tiers and if they have this ability listed.

Being able to see the stats quickly and easily without spending too much time figuring out which character they scale to, or which part of a cosmology, seems like a good payoff. Also, this can be done overtime.

Not only will this help regular users find matches if they want to, people who just visit the fandom won't be as confused since a lot of people think everyone in Low 1-C is the same and whatnot.

 

[ImmortalDread]

This seems to require far too much work, as we would have to investigate the nature of and add new sections to every single character in this wiki for extremely limited payoff. My apologies.

We are not demanding this.

However, the characters with higher- or lower-dimensional nature are still usually rather easy to discern from their tiers and if they have this ability listed.

Exactly, the only characters who will benefit from this are smurfs or those who have higher/lower dimensionality than the default assumption which is 3D.

So it is not for every character but for those who are different from default.

 

[Antvasima]

But an entire new standard section still seems like too much. Maybe an optional section could be added though. I am not sure.

@AKM sama @DontTalkDT @DarkDragonMedeus @Mr._Bambu @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale

What do you think?

 

[Reiner04]

However, the characters with higher- or lower-dimensional nature are still usually rather easy to discern from their tiers and if they have this ability listed

We can make Dimensionality section for only necessary for characters with HDE or LDE not for 3D characters then it won't be much of work.

 

[ImmortalDread]

We can make Dimensionality section for only necessary for characters with HDE or LDE not for 3D characters then it won't be much of work.

I said it. No need to repeat the point

 

[Antvasima]

We can make Dimensionality section for only necessary for characters with HDE or LDE not for 3D characters then it won't be much of work.

I suppose that might be an idea, yes.

 

[Ringki_64]

I suppose that might be an idea, yes.

so do u guys have to explain how they have hde too?

 

[ImmortalDread]

so do u guys have to explain how they have hde too?

Obviously but not in dimensionality section, this is related to HDE justification

 

[Megaraptor149]

Agree, in order to be able to distinguish the difference in dimensions, especially the Characters in tier Low 1-C to 1-B

 

[Greenshifter]

An example of a page with the dimensionality listed from another wiki: https://thecodex.fandom.com/wiki/Omnitraxus_Prime

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Still against this sort of idea as a whole. Don't think a section on it is necessary.

 

[Qawsedf234]

But an entire new standard section still seems like too much. Maybe an optional section could be added though. I am not sure.

@AKM sama @DontTalkDT @DarkDragonMedeus @Mr._Bambu @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale

What do you think?

Imo it would just be like text boxes or discussion boxes. It should be a new standard but we don't need to go through every single older profile and change them. Just have newer profiles have them and then slowly work through the older stuff.

 

[BasedNecoScaler69]

Like MGQ said earlier in this thread, could this work for how many layers a character is into 1-A?

 

[Antvasima]

Imo it would just be like text boxes or discussion boxes. It should be a new standard but we don't need to go through every single older profile and change them. Just have newer profiles have them and then slowly work through the older stuff.

Wouldn't it be enough to add such a section to pages for characters that are not 3-dimensional?

 

[Qawsedf234]

Wouldn't it be enough to add such a section to pages for characters that are not 3-dimensional?

Yeah, maybe a tiering level under the AP section that would be like "Low 1-C (Sixth Dimensional) | 1-A (Aleph 4)" or something to that effect.

 

[Deagonx]

I think this is already covered more or less by the Higher Dimensional Existence ability, and anyone who lacks that can just be assumed to be three-dimensional (or lower)

 

[ImmortalDread]

Imo it would just be like text boxes or discussion boxes. It should be a new standard but we don't need to go through every single older profile and change them. Just have newer profiles have them and then slowly work through the older stuff.

Like we always have been doing. Correct!

 

[BasedNecoScaler69]

I think this is already covered more or less by the Higher Dimensional Existence ability, and anyone who lacks that can just be assumed to be three-dimensional (or lower)

A lot of pages just list (hde) without justification, or what dimension HDE

 

[Deagonx]

A lot of pages just list (hde) without justification, or what dimension HDE

That's more of a problem with those profiles, rather than the concept.

 

[Reiner04]

I think this is already covered more or less by the Higher Dimensional Existence ability, and anyone who lacks that can just be assumed to be three-dimensional (or lower)

The thread is suggesting it to be more of presentable on the pages, as a section for itself (such as names, Tiers, and genders) rather than being smtg like P&A and I also was thinking this since long time (but ig there are others as well), it'll make pages looks more presentable in looks imv.