- 7,890
- 14,939
Of course. My role here is not to provide an alternative to the theories you suggested, it is to hold your theories to a certain standard of evidence. What you're suggesting is that in the absence of a different explanation backed by specific evidence, your interpretation, no matter how shakey, should be accepted by default. This is, of course, ridiculous.Can't show a single scan or proof.
Nor do I need to. Animal Man is referring to the M-Field, not the Source as in the Jack Kirby character. Even if he was, however, there's no reason a 3-D universe couldn't affect the Source, if that's how the writer wanted to write it.can't prove how creating a single 3-d universe affects the source
1. I never said Antagon wasn't the one, I said you haven't sufficiently proven that he is the one.You kept saying Atagon isn't the one who would destroy creation then I shower you proof then you say it just a universe not creation.
2. I asked you to explain your evidence, and you did not.
3. Buddy himself said it was just a universe.
This isn't really relevant. The fact is that the two are used in the same way in this story. Using creation for all of DC is pretty inconsistent.also tell me whendc has ever used creation to represent universe. When creation literally means the totality of DC multiverse.