A very small animal man crt.

[Westcoast5005]

P&a this should be added to his profile:
Plot manipulation, existence erasure bfr, quantum manipulation.

 

[Westcoast5005]

Bump

 

[Teezar]

I don't see plot Manipulation in your scan.

 

[Westcoast5005]

I don't see plot Manipulation in your scan.

? I showed scans of him manipulating the comic book panel. The ee and the bfr are based on plot manipulation.

 

[Firestorm808]

Do we have any citations for these scans?

 

[Teezar]

? I showed scans of him manipulating the comic book panel. The ee and the bfr are based on plot manipulation.

Didn't realise it,sorry.

 

[Westcoast5005]

Do we have any citations for these scans?

I would try to find them

 

[Westcoast5005]

Do we have any citations for these scans?

Animal man issues: 46,47,48,49,50. For antagon.
Also issue 18, 19, issue 52, 55, 56, 65

 

[Antvasima]

I understand plot manipulation and existence erasure, but why quantum manipulation?

 

[Westcoast5005]

If it's controversial I could remove it but buddy basically leaps into a new state through quantum leap.

 

[Antvasima]

I think that seems to be very speculative based on what was shown above.

 

[Westcoast5005]

I think that seems to be very speculative based on what was shown above.

Ok. It shouldn't be added then.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for being reasonable.

What about the powers listed in the previous thread about this subject?

 

[Westcoast5005]

Thank you for being reasonable.

What about the powers listed in the previous thread about this subject?

Yeah there were abilities like immortality and acausulity and some more but I wanted to make it in another thread so that this thread doesn't get congested and I can find the citation.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. That is probably fine.

 

[Westcoast5005]

Bump

 

[Westcoast5005]

So can this get added.

 

[Antvasima]

I think so, yes, but can you summarise who have accepted this first please?

 

[Westcoast5005]

I think so, yes, but can you summarise who have accepted this first please?

Ok.
Accepted: confluctor, bernkastell, teezar, xearsay,
And firestorm808 is pending.

 

[Antvasima]

Hmm. I would prefer more evaluations from knowledgeable members first.

@Zensum @C2_of_Omegon @Eficiente @Qawsedf234 @Sandman31 @SuperAPM @Firestorm808 @EmperorRorepme @LuciferDC099 @Newendigo @Ehnkr2beboh @Deagonx @Elizio33 @LordTracer @The_Impress @Planck69 @MarvelFanatic119

Your further input would be appreciated here.

 

[LordTracer]

I suppose this seems fine.

 

[Westcoast5005]

Anymore input?.

 

[Westcoast5005]

Bumb

 

[Antvasima]

Well, I cannot force our members to be interested enough to respond here.

Anyway, which members have agreed to what so far?

 

[Westcoast5005]

Its seems like only Amelia lonelihart but not 100% sure if she agrees.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. I'm afraid that is not enough.

I thought that we have had more members commenting here though.

 

[Antvasima]

It seems like @Sandman31 debunked the claims here earlier:

https://vsbattles.com/threads/gigantic-animal-man-revision.52475/page-2#post-1717891

 

[Teezar]

Bump

 

[1st_Virtue_of_Pure_Void]

I practically agree with this and with this statement below:

"scans happens in the same chapter when it first state higher dimensions the next scan then states the red stretches to infinity if you combine the scans together Morrison is saying it stretches into infinite higher dimensions not to mention the red also stretches to the world tree and pass creation."

I could use the same logic to make that dang CRT for TOS, so kudos to you @Westcoast5005

 

[Antvasima]

It seems like @Sandman31 debunked the claims here earlier:

https://vsbattles.com/threads/gigantic-animal-man-revision.52475/page-2#post-1717891

Again...

 

[Teezar]

Sandman was talking about M-field, pure void was talking about the red.

 

[1st_Virtue_of_Pure_Void]

Again...

the red seems much different then the M-field

 

[Antvasima]

Okay then. We still need more input here though.

 

[Elizio33]

I agree with Sandman31

 

[Westcoast5005]

How is someone that isn't even here argument still relevant? Not to mention he didn't debunk anything.

 

[Xearsay]

I don’t really see how what Sandman argues addresses what Westcoast is saying.

 

[Teezar]

I agree with Sandman31

1. He has commented here.
2. He was talk about M-field and the source.

I don't think you looked at the entire thread before commenting. If this is how things are done then accuracy can never happen.

 

[Elizio33]

1. He has commented here.
2. He was talk about M-field and the source.

I don't think you looked at the entire thread before commenting. If this is how things are done then accuracy can never happen.

I know. I just said I agree with Sandman31's comment in the other CRT regarding M-field and the Source. For the rest, I need to read the comics first. Especially with the Red stretching over an infinite amount of higher dimensions, transcending space and time and the Red being a mesh for plantonic forms.

 

[Westcoast5005]

About sandman comment about the source Feat being a chain reaction I feel that's wrong why would creating one universe affect the source? What would make more him recreating creation and fixing the source or only one universe.

 

[Elizio33]

Okay, i found the scans about the Red since the links in the OP aren't working.

"The web of life -- waiting, stretching into infinity -- catches me."

"I recognize myself in mirrors reflecting higher dimensions."

"The field is a mesh of countless smaller fields; each one a blueprint which guides the formation of atoms into molecules, molecules into cells, cells into tissues, systems! Every species is represented by its own field. Its own ideal form! It's like plato's archetypal reality, more subtle."

I need to read more before giving my final thought, but it makes senses. I don't know for the 1-A stuffs. For the Animal Masters and the Red, There's a big CRT about DC Cosmology with all the separate cosmologies going on. Because we are currently using a composite cosmology, recreating the DC Multiverse is 1-A, but Morrison's Cosmology alone is not 1-A. I agree with the OP for now.