again, any reason to not consider that as a valid explanation? specially when it is supported by the dbs anime?
no it doesn't? how does that prove that?
yeah, but 1 as null explained it, occams razor, you examplanation requires way too many assumptions rather then the simplest one, 2 i explained multiple times how another random, non conected timeline apearing there makes absolutely 0 sense, but you kept ignoring it, nothing indicates that it is showing an alternate timeline there
it WAS referring z back in the day, if it was retconed into being an cannon continuation of super, then it can't be a reference to that anymore
it being retroactively implemented as a continuation of super?
and i showed that he was in the manga
no, you proved that he was created for the anime, he was stated to exist in the manga
dude, could you please structure your answers? it is incredibly hard to know what you are responding to, assuming that this is about
this image, it straight up says that dragon ball is being continued in the animation
again, i have no idea what you are referring to
i also don't know what you are referring to here, also accusing me does nothing to the thread
stop derailing, this is not relevant here
you just ignored everything i said, address my points directly please, the scans in the op are not supporting gt being an alternate timeline whatsoever