• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

A major update to Dragon Ball timelines

Status
Not open for further replies.
Technically they're both canon to the extended multiverse of Dragon Ball with the GT continuity just being one of many of those "Alternate timelines". Of course we should still avoid making use of any cross scaling outside of both versions being usable for Dragon Ball Heroes scaling.
This seems fair to me.

I'm also of the opinion that we shouldn't be doing any cross-scaling.
 
This seems fair to me.

I'm also of the opinion that we shouldn't be doing any cross-scaling.
It is for this very purpose, without doing any scaling, DBGT will only become canonical the canonical cosmology as a distinct timeline like the line of trunks, but people were quoting from downgrade and upgrade.
 
This seems fair to me.

I'm also of the opinion that we shouldn't be doing any cross-scaling.
Yeah that’s what the crt was proposing for gt to merely be an Alternate Timeline within the cosmology since the cosmology already accepted as 2-B
Whether or not this leads to some controversial proposals as Chariot suggested, the idea presented in this thread itself seems uncontroversial and logical. I agree
Thanks for your input since we have 4 staff agrees I think after the 48 hours we could slide this in with the 2-B cosmology note
 
i can already tell what you're cooking, this is gonna lead to some cosmology bullshit if it gets accepted
I was thinking this exactly LMAO
FjwFlJGVEAEmWI7.jpg
 
There’s nothing wrong with it and it’s what the scans imply, but nonetheless there’s no point in circling around as 4 staff have evaluated and in 3 hours will get accepted
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top