Gon said he did, thus he did it.
End of story. Exposition is delivered through dialogue. Characters are not real people, if a writer gives a line to a character that gives information about a situation, that line is to be believed unless contradicted.
I also need to point out how the hunter had no idea where Gon went even after the fact. He didn't register anything.
At this point, I'll just tell you to piss off.
Killua's electricity is fed on real electricity. It comes from a magic system that
is capable of creating virtually anything and creating properties. Has shown the same properties as electricity by making muscles contract against stronger characters.
These are all facts. Again, if you just ignore it, and say it's headcanon, I'll again tell you to piss off
It's not. We see it leaving Killua's finger and reaching the ground as Killua is moving. It's what we see.
It didn't even ricochet off the ground like such thick lightning would. Nah.
Look at the DAMN panel.
I literally lost my composure because you state such stupidities with confidence.
He launches it like a spear, winding up and launching it downwards.
When you claim something as silly as this, you HAVE to question yourself: "What's the alternative?"
Did he create the arc, and
then the lightning came out on command? Killua literally doesn't have the kind of control to do something like that. Nor does he have a reason, it would be less effective as a quick surprise attack. He threw it like one'd throw a baseball. It left at the point it's shown to leave.
Cease and Desist.
YES.
IT IS.
You cannot claim the value contradicts
ANYTHING. You simply have no argument here. They trained to the point their previous speed was outclassed, they can scale to whatever feat they perform unless it breaks powerscaling.
"unaccepted"? Even when a character stated to have a certain reaction, it's CONTROVERSIAL to use higher timeframes. Didn't the Garou feat have a ton of debate over using canonical reactions?
The reaction page has several values, accepted ones too. Hunters are shown to be faster than the eye consistently, yet using anything beyond peak human is prohibited?
Stop clinging on the regulation's standards. Peak Human is
obviously downplaying.