- 5,233
- 2,631
For the perceiving part, i think is important to mention that the scans says they exist due to the perceiving, not that they were created, meaning they are still reliant on arceus mind and thus exist purely inside of it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A verse existing as just imagination can be R/F like SCP.Isn't that just subjective reality?
Wait where is this??Something to add as supporting evidence is that the Legend Plate states that, and I quote: "From all creations, over all creations, does the Original One watch over all."
Text of the legend Plate in Pokemon legends ArceusWait where is this??
Here.Wait where is this??
Buddy it’s why I left the wiki. I’m just here for a stint.Y'know, things like this are part of why Kieran left the wiki, double standards. How many other pages and verses are unreliable on this wiki because of double standards? Think about that.
I know but that is because it is explicitly in their imagination in that case it is probably fine here as well just to be clear.A verse existing as just imagination can be R/F like SCP.
Anyway, Saikou seemed to make good points. What is the evidence for Arceus being infinitely superior to everybody else in Pokémon?
Because it isn't needed because of the Tierinf System QnA ya'll need to change in order to reject this
Hmm. I think that might cause serious problems for our overall reliability in that case.Infinite superiority isn’t needed though. Saikous point completely ignores the note on our FAQs section on transcendence.
Dude, 8 others staff shown to agree.Hmm. I think that might cause serious problems for our overall reliability in that case.
What do you think should be done regarding the note, @DontTalkDT ?
If you are referring to the creation trio, yes they were literally stated to be created.For the perceiving part, i think is important to mention that the scans says they exist due to the perceiving, not that they were created, meaning they are still reliant on arceus mind and thus exist purely inside of it
Though this was clearly Avatar Arceus so it's irrelevant to this discussion anyway.Time Pokémon Dialga, Space Pokémon Palkia
It is said that a Pokemon called Arceus was the first to create them...
I don't particularly care whether or not Arceus gets upgraded, and he probably will be. I am concerned that our overall standards may be unreliable in this area.Dude, 8 others staff shown to agree.
You really going to ruin this because of a single ex staff not liking this CRT?
Well I hope all the staff and members who agree are fully aware of the verse and all the context. I don’t see how their opinions can go if they don’t know the context of all this tbf….Confluctor straight up also said they don't know the verse at all, so I don't see how their opinion can go if they don't know the context of all of this tbf...
I am not looking thru the whole thing but are you referring to @Bernkastel argument because they don't actually mention the Tiering System page disagrees to my knowledge.yes it was brought up. It spanned for several pages because of the transcendence point, and it was decided to not be required in the end.
They're clear enough in the FAQ page.I don't particularly care whether or not Arceus gets upgraded, and he probably will be. I am concerned that our overall standards may be unreliable in this area.
well yeah, you can't exist without being created, my point is that the heart perceiving them is why they exist all the time, not just having been createdIf you are referring to the creation trio, yes they were literally stated to be created.
They're clear enough in the FAQ page.
If a realm is beyond space and time and shown superiority to 4D space time in nature then it qualifies.
Let's wait for DontTalk please, so we do not make a mistake in either direction.I literally pointed out that it disagrees with the "Tiering System" page.
I have stated multiple times I don't know which is rightLet's wait for DontTalk please, so we do not make a mistake in either direction.
Since we know nothing about the relationship between Arceus and Hoopa, save for the fact that Arceus is superior to the latter, this doesn't really support or deny anything.The evidence about Hoopa
It doesn't tbh. This is kind of what people were assuming was the case with Marvel's Firmament and Eternity, but this was later proven false by WOG himself. Being parts of a cosmic being is neither supporting evidence nor an argument against transcendence.and the verse being a tiny aspect of Arceus’s existence should, even if not necessary as of now, still prove infinite transcendence. .
This was never stated.well yeah, you can't exist without being created, my point is that the heart perceiving them is why they exist all the time, not just having been created
Yes! The heart was born and it began to perceive (認識) the world!
Space and time were mixed in the newborn heart
But we do. This point has been brought up more than once.Since we know nothing about the relationship between Arceus and Hoopa, save for the fact that Arceus is superior to the latter, this doesn't really support or deny anything.
Or Arceus's dimension resists and small isn't infinitesimalBut we do. This point has been brought up more than once.
The relationship is that Hoopas infinitely powered rings, even in it’s true form Hoopa Unbound, cannot under any circumstance in any way interact with Arceus’s realm, despite the rings being able to forcibly interact with the Creation Trios dimensions. This is speaking from a dimensional standpoint in showcasing the relationship resulting in Arceus’s realm being superior
combine this with the verse being a small aspect of Arceus’s existence and we get infinite transcendence.
And most people do not address it, because it doesn't really mean anything.But we do. This point has been brought up more than once.
It's infinite power doesn't make it any more hax than if it wasn't stated to not have infinite power though, and it's not like it was specifically mentioned that this was the reason that Arceus wasn't summoned from his dimension. Again, it could just be a range problem than AP. Or maybe it could be AP related but only that the realm is, to an unquantifiable degree, superior to the Creation Trio's. Or even a simple problem of incompatibility. Overall way too many assumptions for me to take this theory seriously.The relationship is that Hoopas infinitely powered rings, even in it’s true form Hoopa Unbound, cannot under any circumstance in any way interact with Arceus’s realm, despite the rings being able to forcibly interact with the Creation Trios dimensions. This is speaking from a dimensional standpoint in showcasing the relationship resulting in Arceus’s realm being superior
It really doesn't. Being aspects of him, again, doesn't really mean anything and the Hoopa thing kinds of ignores a wide range of possible reasons.combine this with the verse being a small aspect of Arceus’s existence and we get infinite transcendence.
The fact that every single one of the Creation Trio outclasses Hoopa in every conceivable way despite its rings being able to access their dimensions by force completely debunks the possibility of it being AP related.And most people do not address it, because it doesn't really mean anything.
It's infinite power doesn't make it any more hax than if it wasn't stated to not have infinite power though, and it's not like it was specifically mentioned that this was the reason that Arceus wasn't summoned from his dimension. Again, it could just be a range problem than AP. Or maybe it could be AP related
Incompatibility is headcanon when there’s nothing “incompatable” about a being who’s rings can link to dimensions where even the concepts of time and space are non existent.but only that the realm is, to an unquantifiable degree, superior to the Creation Trio's. Or even a simple problem of incompatibility.
It absolutely does mean something. A tiny facet of his existence being the 4-D aspect of the cosmology gives strong implications of his true existence being flat out superior in nature to said 4-D space-time, and this by itself under the current citation of the transcendence FAQs is already enough to substantiate Low 1-CIt really doesn't. Being aspects of him, again, doesn't really mean anything
All the more reason not to bring it up tbh.The fact that every single one of the Creation Trio outclasses Hoopa in every conceivable way despite its rings being able to access their dimensions by force completely debunks the possibility of it being AP related.
And I’m not seeing the need for why this needs to be stated for why Arceus can’t be summoned when we have showings of why it can’t be, such as Ghris (a man with a facet of Arceus’s power) sealing Hoopas power away.
His infinite power allows him to access these dimensions. That's it. The relation to Arceus is practically non-existent.Incompatibility is headcanon when there’s nothing “incompatable” about a being who’s rings can link to dimensions where even the concepts of time and space are non existent.
We have direct citation of infinite power being in use with the rings, we don’t need to assume anything for that. There’s more direct evidence of infinite superiority via this than there is with it being “unquantifiable”.
Low 2-C is a possibly infinite vast tier. 2-C is a possibly infinite vast tier. 2-B is a possibly infinite vast tier. 2-A is an impossibly infinite vast tier. Having multiversal beings as tiny aspects of yourself can be the case, and be superior to them without suddenly jumping tiers. It's neither evidence for, nor an argument against something.It absolutely does mean something. A tiny facet of his existence being the 4-D aspect of the cosmology gives strong implications of his true existence being flat out superior in nature to said 4-D space-time,
Please quote where having 4D avatars and/or being superior to the cosmology they embody is at all a requirement enough to substantiate Low 1-C.and this by itself under the current citation of the transcendence FAQs is already enough to substantiate Low 1-C
Occam's razor goes to the simplest option and there's absolutely nothing in your Hoopa argument that is at all supportive of the fact that Arceus, for a reason that wasn't even given a proper explanation, is suddenly uncountable infinitely greater than the perceived showings.Even without Hoopas role in all this (which doesn’t have a “wide range” of possibilities of why it’s rings can’t access Arceus’s dimension besides the ocams razor that it can’t despite being perfectly capable of accessing the Creation Trios dimensions).
Or it means it being AP related is wrong and is not a counter argument. We are speaking about comparisons in dimensionality, not tiers (when it’s beyond obvious Hoopas tier is fodder compared to the god tiers).All the more reason not to bring it up tbh.
…And that in itself is the point. His infinitely powered rings can interact with the creation trios dimensions by force. But they can’t with Arceus’s, implying infinite superiority for the latters realm.His infinite power allows him to access these dimensions. That's it. The relation to Arceus is practically non-existent.
Except we aren’t simply speaking about regular 2-A powered beings here, we are speaking about abstract beings who are 2-A concepts. Those 2-A concepts being small aspects of Arceus’s true existence.Low 2-C is a possibly infinite vast tier. 2-C is a possibly infinite vast tier. 2-B is a possibly infinite vast tier. 2-A is an impossibly infinite vast tier. Having multiversal beings as tiny aspects of yourself can be the case, and be superior to them without suddenly jumping tiers. It's neither evidence for, nor an argument against something.
Strym already quoted this part of the standards several times in this thread. Being superior to 4-D space-time in nature is enough to be granted Low 1-C, that has been the whole point of contention here.Please quote where having 4D avatars and/or being superior to the cosmology they embody is at all a requirement enough to substantiate Low 1-C.
Besides Hoopas infinitely powered rings failing miserably against what is considered only a tiny facet of Arceus’s power at best, despite having explicit proof of forcibly interacting with 4-D dimensions. The Creation Trios dimensions.Occam's razor goes to the simplest option and there's absolutely nothing in your Hoopa argument that is at all supportive of the fact that Arceus, for a reason that wasn't even given a proper explanation, is suddenly uncountable infinitely greater than the perceived showings.
I m quite confused here, all the proof here is just either arcues being above baseline 2a or a bigger 4d guy, not 5d.
Repeating “don’t mean much” is not a counter argument and it’s been explained more than once why it does. Interacting with 4-D dimensions by force but not with another implies the latter is superior to the formerThere is abosultly no proof for arcues to be infinitly superior to them in existence. Hoopa's infinitly powered rings don't mean much either.
*3 conceptsBeing beyond 2 4d concepts dosent make you "5d", I heavily disagree giving a rating just on that.
It’s not a requirement and Archie Sonic and the chaos force getting Low 1-C without needing to fulfill this requirement is a perfect example of why it’s not.the whole concept of 5d is to be uncountably infinitly superior to 4d in existence, which is a requirement that is not being fulfilled here.
It's a requirement...I already told you that Archie Sonic is Low 1-C because according to our standard transcending a 2-A is uncountable infinite superior to it (the reason can be found above, as Ultima said it numerous times both in forum and discord).It’s not a requirement and Archie Sonic and the chaos force getting Low 1-C without needing to fulfill this requirement is a perfect example of why it’s not.
cough cough.Already debunked. There’s no such thing as “bigger 4-D”, being above 4-D means you have to be at least 5-D at a minimum.
It does not when above baseline 2a range is infact a thing, there is a staff thread about this going on and there is infact, a difference between 5d range and above baseline 2a range.Repeating “don’t mean much” is not a counter argument and it’s been explained more than once why it does. Interacting with 4-D dimensions by force but not with another implies the latter is superior to the former
*3 concepts
I don't know much about that mouse and neither do I want to, but if it is the sole reason for him having low 1c. then might as well downgrade him.And once again, the argument isn’t to give Low 1-C off “just” this. Hoopas part in this is supporting evidence, not the main justification.
It’s not a requirement and Archie Sonic and the chaos force getting Low 1-C without needing to fulfill this requirement is a perfect example of why it’s not.
Hence why people have been saying to either change the standards and downgrade Archie, or shut up about this requirement and grant the upgrade here.
Dimensionality and tiers are directly linked and you're arguing about the AP of Arceus, Hoopas tier is irrelevant, though you haven't provided evidence for either.Or it means it being AP related is wrong and is not a counter argument. We are speaking about comparisons in dimensionality, not tiers (when it’s beyond obvious Hoopas tier is fodder compared to the god tiers).
You're just continuing to make assumptions that were never implied in the texts.…And that in itself is the point. His infinitely powered rings can interact with the creation trios dimensions by force. But they can’t with Arceus’s, implying infinite superiority for the latters realm.
And conceptual existences matter to Arceus's AP how? Don't answer that. It clearly doesn't. This argument is not only irrelevant, but also false, considering, iirc, in Pokemon HGSS it was stated the Original Spirit created space-time before it created the creation trio.Except we aren’t simply speaking about regular 2-A powered beings here, we are speaking about abstract beings who are 2-A concepts. Those 2-A concepts being small aspects of Arceus’s true existence.
Transcending in such a way and indicating superiority is different that just being an unquantifiable degree of superiority.Strym already quoted this part of the standards several times in this thread. Being superior to 4-D space-time in nature is enough to be granted Low 1-C, that has been the whole point of contention here.
Yes, so Arceus is stronger than the Hoopa rings. You realize that's literally the only thing I can gleam from that, since infinite power or not, it's just an interdimensional range feat.Besides Hoopas infinitely powered rings failing miserably against what is considered only a tiny facet of Arceus’s power at best, despite having explicit proof of forcibly interacting with 4-D dimensions. The Creation Trios dimensions.
They are all supported by the same degree, since the reasons were never described or even implied tbh.This is much more supported than any other “possibility” as to why the rings can’t interact with Arceus’s realm.
That is blatantly untrue. You guys do realize low 2-C characters significantly affect space-time continuums? Which are 4-D? And there can be bigger and smaller universes (pocket dimensions)? Hell, even in the anime the Pokemon cosmology have multiverse of different sizes. Or that there are also many worlds within worlds in fiction?Already debunked. There’s no such thing as “bigger 4-D”, being above 4-D means you have to be at least 5-D at a minimum.
It was never stated, and the implication is basically decided based on headcanon. I don't agree.Repeating “don’t mean much” is not a counter argument and it’s been explained more than once why it does. Interacting with 4-D dimensions by force but not with another implies the latter is superior to the former
A weak justification that should be dropped entirely.*3 concepts
And once again, the argument isn’t to give Low 1-C off “just” this. Hoopas part in this is supporting evidence, not the main justification.
I don't know about Archie Sonic. I'm dealing with this franchise now, thanks.It’s not a requirement and Archie Sonic and the chaos force getting Low 1-C without needing to fulfill this requirement is a perfect example of why it’s not.
I literally never even brought Archie up what is wrong with you. You need to chill.Hence why people have been saying to either change the standards and downgrade Archie, or shut up about this requirement and grant the upgrade here.
Not responding to everything else. Just this bit.And conceptual existences matter to Arceus's AP how? Don't answer that. It clearly doesn't. This argument is not only irrelevant, but also false, considering, iirc, in Pokemon HGSS it was stated the Original Spirit created space-time before it created the creation trio.
It needs to be specific and concise and say that the places Arceus embodies and created are spatial dimensions that transcend the space-time of the 4D continuumAnyway, the justification for either end (i.e just "Low Complex Multiverse level" or "At least Multiverse level, likely Multiverse level+, possibly Low Complex Multiverse level) should be this:
(Is the origin of the creation of everything in Pokémon, including the realms of The Creation Trio, including Giratina's which lacks both time and directions, and Palkia's which has domain over both the spatial dimensions and the directions, with the Creation Trio members also being their own realms themselves. Arceus is the "God who transcends everything" whose realm is beyond both time and space and that treats the Pokémon reality, which is made of countless to likely infinite universes, as a mere aspect of its true being, as also showcased from its consciousness extending across both space and time and Hoopa being able to forcefully summon the Creation Trio out of their realms with the "infinite power" of its rings, but being unable to do the same with Arceus', as it's the only one who could seal said power)
You think is good?