9-A Hax brackets round 3

[Moritzva]

Without a number we can only say that it would be an unknown number above 300, whereas 682 has a casual 340 feat

We do have a number.

Massively above a casual 300 is a lot bigger than casual 340 in my mind, unless your argument is that severely damaging a guy who can one shot another guy is a 1.1x difference.

If you disagree, that's fine. I disagree with you, and my vote remains for Tricky.

 

[Agnaa]

Massively above a casual 300 is a lot bigger than casual 340 in my mind, unless your argument is that severely damaging a guy who can one shot another guy is a 1.1x difference.

If you disagree, that's fine. I disagree with you, and my vote remains for Tricky.

It's not just that Weekly disagrees, it's that this is the site's policy on one-shots. If we accepted it as a 1.1x difference then some characters would get upgraded through long scaling chains of one-shots, which we don't do.

 

[Moritzva]

I'm not arguing an upgrade.

I'm arguing that they are clearly above 300 megajoules by a large amount.

"Significantly above (x)" exists on this site. We don't use it to justify tier upgrades, except for the occasional "possibly ", but it's a valid indicator of AP within that tier.

 

[GojiBoyForever]

Holy shit did 682 just lose?

 

[Genericstickman]

Yes to a clown

 

[EnnardTrap1987]

682, a powerful lizard that is unkillable without causing harm to the universe...

Loses to a Clown.

 

[Christian_Higdon]

682, a powerful lizard that is unkillable without causing harm to the universe...

Loses to a Clown.

News flash!

That's Extended Cano

 

[The_Smashor]

I beleive this can be added, now.

 

[Moritzva]

If it hasn't been added, could someone add it, then?

 

[Yellowpig10]

This still hasn't been added

 

[Uniasha]

well this is a first

 

[Deleted member 16409]

Delete this one, Tricky is 8-B now.

 

[Agnaa]

Delete this one, Tricky is 8-B now.

If you want a match deleted, you should post about it in the Versus Thread Removal Requests thread, not in the match you want removed.

 

[AThe1412]

So... Could this match be readded now that Tricky is 9-A again? Or is it outdated at this point?

 

[DanTheEyeMan01]

So... Could this match be readded now that Tricky is 9-A again? Or is it outdated at this point?

I check 682s profile and it looks the same from what was discussed so maybe?

 

[First_Witch]

Necros are against the rules, this thread is over a whole ass year old.

If you want this matchup concluded, remake it.

 

[DanTheEyeMan01]

Necros are against the rules, this thread is over a whole ass year old.

If you want this matchup concluded, remake it.

Not for versus threads.

"Please do not bump topics that have been inactive for over 3 months without a legitimate argument, and entirely avoid bumping topics that have been concluded. However, we make exceptions for versus threads."

 

[First_Witch]

I could have sworn this applies to matches as well, necroed matchups do get closed.

Check with a staffmember before trying to add this

 

[DanTheEyeMan01]

I could have sworn this applies to matches as well, necroed matchups do get closed.

Check with a staffmember before trying to add this

Think it got changed overtime.

Also I'll do it tomorroww gtg sleep.