- 5,796
- 3,264
- Thread starter
- #321
Let's use Daizenshu instead.Ouch. That puts a wrench in things then. I thought we don't use Kai.
We don't disregard it completely, anyways, and the model from DBZ Kai and Daizenshu are equal, regardless.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let's use Daizenshu instead.Ouch. That puts a wrench in things then. I thought we don't use Kai.
I'll still need a good quality image of the Daizenshuu map.Let's use Daizenshu instead.
We don't disregard it completely, anyways, and the model from DBZ Kai and Daizenshu are equal, regardless.
We don't use Kai, however the cosmology is all the same for all Dragon Ball so we still can use it's modelThat puts a wrench in things then. I thought we don't use Kai.
True. The cosmologies are the exact same in all materials so uh, oh well.We don't use Kai, however the cosmology is all the same for all Dragon Ball so we still can use it's model
I'll still need a good quality image of the Daizenshuu map.
KLOL, with the anime model, I'm sure the results would be decent, right???True. The cosmologies are the exact same in all materials so uh, oh well.
I'll see if I can find a Blu-Ray copy of that episode for kicks.
Hopefully so.KLOL, with the anime model, I'm sure the results would be decent, right???
The results could give us a decent rating such as 3-A, no?This was the original one, but it is outdated since it came before the Kaioshin realm was introduced.
This was the updated one, also used by the anime. The anime map is identical, so any one can be used.
Btw, if you ask me, Earth is at the edge of the universe, so the observable universe sphere should also be placed somewhere near the edge, which would inflate the result by a lot, if we decide to go that route, but it certainly can be discussed. We can probably make two ends for the calc, one assuming that the observable universe fits at the bottom center, and the other assuming that the observable universe fits somewhere near the edge.
But in the Observable Universe, the Earth is in the center, and if we assume that DB's universe is the same as ours, you can't put it on the edge.This was the original one, but it is outdated since it came before the Kaioshin realm was introduced.
This was the updated one, also used by the anime. The anime map is identical, so any one can be used.
Btw, if you ask me, Earth is at the edge of the universe, so the observable universe sphere should also be placed somewhere near the edge, which would inflate the result by a lot, if we decide to go that route, but it certainly can be discussed. We can probably make two ends for the calc, one assuming that the observable universe fits at the bottom center, and the other assuming that the observable universe fits somewhere near the edge.
But in the Observable Universe, the Earth is in the center, and if we assume that DB's universe is the same as ours, you can't put it on the edge.
I'm talking about Earth IRLNah, even Bulma says that the Earth is at the edge of the Universe....
So no..
Yeah, but this is DB, and Bulma says that the very Earth of U7 is at the edge of the Universe....I'm talking about Earth IRL
Yeah by the edge, not literally the endpoint of the universe. we know for a fact there are bodies surrounding the earth.I'm talking about Earth IRL
It's crazy how the Earth's position can change the AP outcome ImaoYeah by the edge, not literally the endpoint of the universe. we know for a fact there are bodies surrounding the earth.
I have never said otherwise.Yeah, but this is DB, and Bulma says that the very Earth of U7 is at the edge of the Universe....
Putting the Observable Universe on the edge makes no sense first because the Earth IRL is in the center and second because the other half of the universe would be outside the macrocosm since the center is on the edge.So what AKM says about the edge is more or less right
Look, the Earth doesn't necessarily have to be at the center. There could be other planets.I have never said otherwise.
Putting the Observable Universe on the edge makes no sense first because the Earth IRL is in the center and second because the other half of the universe would be outside the macrocosm since the center is on the edge.
So would you assume that the distance from Earth (DB) to the edge is a distance of half the Observable Universe?As King1 said, at the edge, not the endpoint as there is still distance between Earth and the very dimensional wall that enclosed the Living Realm, so by all mean, from Earth we still have observable universe, with observable universe one end is the endpoint of the living realm
in a sense, yes, you can assume it, as it is stated Earth to be at the edge of the universe, not the very dimensional wall which enclosed the Lower Half of the Macrocosm which is the Living Realm. The edge is a broad termSo would you assume that the distance from Earth (DB) to the edge is a distance of half the Observable Universe?
Also, the Universe is only "based" in our, it was never mentioned that it was identical.remember, the lower half of the Macrocosm called the Living Realm, not the Observable Universe, and it is stated to resemble the real universe, not 1:1 or carbon copy. Also in real life we have two theories with one is infinite universe, other is expanding universe. Observable universe is the expanding universe theory, which as the theory itself, we only know up 46.508 billion light years radius, there is still unknown space beyond, which by all mean, still fit in DB Universe
Well then, how would you put the Observable Universe on the Map of the Macrocosm?in a sense, yes, you can assume it, as it is stated Earth to be at the edge of the universe, not the very dimensional wall which enclosed the Lower Half of the Macrocosm which is the Living Realm. The edge is a broad term
Visual, by all mean is just for reference and scaling, we don't use visual too literalWell then, how would you put the Observable Universe on the Map of the Macrocosm?
Would the distance represented here from Earth to the Edge of the Universe be 46.508 billion light years?
Well then, how would you put the Observable Universe on the Map of the Macrocosm?
Would the distance represented here from Earth to the Edge of the Universe be 46.508 billion light years?
Wait, what would be the reason for assuming that this distance is 46.508 million light years?Visual, by all mean is just for reference and scaling, we don't use visual too literal
well, there is still distance between Earth and the dimensional wall, so you can assume any number on that distance, visual is just for reference and scaling, observable universe size is a safe assumptionWait, what would be the reason for assuming that this distance is 46.508 million light years?
Again, we have no reason to assume the Earth is in the center of the very Universe. Stop bringning your own interpretation, please.Wait, what would be the reason for assuming that this distance is 46.508 million light years?
And again, that's a visual representation. And Bulma stated that the Earth is far away from the center of the Universe.
Exactly, again.As depicted, its location would count as very far from the center of the universe.
yes very far from the center, but it also doesn't mean Earth is close to the end. Distance is a subjective termAs depicted, its location would count as very far from the center of the universe.
Shockwaves can pass through dimensional barriers.Also for people who think the Earth is at the edge of the universe mean the end. Beerus and Goku shockwaves travelled across the universe, reaching to the Kaioshin Realm, then the other side of the shockwave should also reach to other Universe if the Earth is at the end of the universe given how large scale the shockwave is. However nothing indicated the shockwave reach to other universe, that mean the distance between Earth and the Universe endpoint or dimensional wall is still very large. Unless we claim one side of the shockwave travel not far away which make no sense at all
ExactlyDistance is a subjective term
Yes, but again distance is Subjective.Shockwaves can pass through dimensional barriers.
Friend you do not understand anything, tell me when I told you that the EARTH of Dragon Ball is in the center of the universe.Again, we have no reason to assume the Earth is in the center of the very Universe. Stop bringning your own interpretation, please.
See the scan above.
Is not in the center, when it was stated otherwise in the show. Unless you think your Word holds more value than Bulma's
Is stated to be too far from it, and that's all.
You can be very far from the center, but that doesn't flatout mean you are near the dimensional walls of the Universe.Yes, but again distance is Subjective.