• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

1-A Imaginary & Metaphysics

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't deny the entity is speculating but it's further reinforce by lore contexts. Just because one story instant speculated a fact that will be proven later or was proven already in some parts (unrelated to the entity), we can't dismiss all of that just because of this instant.
I've found a very, very convincing reason to dismiss the cave analogy: it's extremely inconsistent to interpret it as literal R>F. In the passage where the allegory of the cave is discussed, they differ over whether the world, stigmata, or humans are the shadows on the wall. Here, the Will of Stigmata states that Kaslana's Stigmata "is a shadow cast by the real Kevin in the past." So what is it? Are the humans shadows? Are they real observers? Maybe it's actually the world that are the shadows. Or perhaps, are the humans the ones casting the shadows? Are the stigmata the real things outside of the cave? Are the stigmata just shadows? It's all too inconsistent to try to draw any solid R>F scaling out of. It seems that the only reasonable way to interpret this is as a bunch of people speculating as Udlmaster suggested.

Either that, or the statements of humans being shadows compared to the real stigmata are only talking about the future AFTER humans become dreamified and Stigmata become made into reality, essentially switching places. If we go by that interpretation, that just means that at the present time, stigmata are fictional and humans are real, but then after project stigma, humans would become fictional and stigmata would become real. It's essentially a downward hierarchy where humans are only surpassed in terms of R>F by first being moved down a "layer" and made into fiction. If baseline reality is "level 1", then the Stigmata simply went from level 0 to 1 and moved the humans from level 1 to 0. There is no "level 2" involved; thus, there is no higher layer of R>F above baseline humanity involved here.
 
While I still Disagree to Star Dream part of the CRT, on reconsideration I'm more unsure on the strength of platonic-like aspect while it does make some sense, so I'd say I'm instead Neutral there and am open to further reconsideration based off what other staff say.
Weaver himself has admitted that "forms" in Honkai don't actually fit with Plato's theory of forms, and on top of that, I've given evidence and reasons as to why the "allegory of the cave" passage cannot be used as evidence for upwards R>F (or 1-A by extension). In light of that, are you still neutral about the thread, or do you disagree? Your input would be appreciated.
 
Hats off to you for going above and beyond to research this.
Thanks. What made it even more of an effort is that Honkai's writing is really convoluted and in a bad way. I say this as someone who plays F/GO. As convoluted as it is, F/GO is way more coherent.

But in the end, I do also have to thank Weaver for providing the context that dismantles his very position.
 
If you played the game, you wouldn't be asking these questions. Kaslana Stigma is formed with the existence of Kevin Kaslana who started Kaslana Bloodline. As stated here and cave theory, Stigma space records and gathers history and knowledge.
Will of Stigmata: Stigmata record their knowledge and your history. If we apply that allegory to our civilisation…
Since, Kevin is the one who started the Kaslana Stigma, it's only right to call it Kevin's Shadow. But not in the way of cave theory. This is a story, not a guidebook so we can't take words by words

Are they real observers? What? They are just giving allegories to the current circumstances. There's really nothing to say about that.

Kevin is the one who leads the project stigma by shouldering the authority of finality. Of course, he will the one in between. Through project stigma, thoughts inside stigma will be given form in imaginary space and descend to external space. It's also akin to projecting shadows from Stigma.

Will of Stigmata: Yes. Their consciousness will be converted into an existence the same as Stigmata and recede to the interstice of the Imaginary world. Correspondingly…
Will of Stigmata: The thoughts in Stigmata will be given form, gradually descend to the external space, and replace people in their sleep.
Uldmaster said they are just speculating but Imaginary being the true essence and other quality factors are proven in other parts of story. Just taking one arc out of the whole story and saying it's not valid just because some characters in story are speculating is so wrong.
Either that, or the statements of humans being shadows compared to the real stigmata are only talking about the future AFTER humans become dreamified and Stigmata become made into reality, essentially switching places. If we go by that interpretation, that just means that at the present time, stigmata are fictional and humans are real, but then after project stigma, humans would become fictional and stigmata would become real
Wrong again. Yes they are talking about after the Project Stigma completed but there are already those who fused with stigma space and also completed forms like Hare. They are talking this as a goal not event B after event A.
A physical entity, a living human, lost his unitarity in real space due to some perplexing technology that was closer to magic.
Mei: This is…
Raven: His dream fused with the Stigmata space… that’s what Hare told me. You’re a Herrscher, maybe you can validate that.
Also it's not a downward hierarchy since that explanation is overly simplified.
Here's how it will happen step by step
Theresa: They’d get lost in the initial dream… Like the St. Freya where Himeko was that I dreamed of…

Will of Stigmata: Yes. Their consciousness will be converted into an existence the same as Stigmata and recede to the interstice of the Imaginary world. Correspondingly…

Will of Stigmata: The thoughts in Stigmata will be given form, gradually descend to the external space, and replace people in their sleep.

Theresa: Stigmata… will replace humans…
So, it's like taking reality, convert it into a idealized form in stigma space, project it back to real space.

I only said it doesn't need to be copy paste of plato theory of forms. What's important here is not about whether the theory used in honkai is directly copy pasted version of theory of forms. It's about what's real and what's not real. As long as qualitative superiority is proven, it should be fine.
Weaver himself has admitted that "forms" in Honkai don't actually fit with Plato's theory of forms, and on top of that, I've given evidence and reasons as to why the "allegory of the cave" passage cannot be used as evidence for upwards R>F (or 1-A by extension). In light of that, are you still neutral about the thread, or do you disagree? Your input would be appreciated.
To be honest, all of this doesn't really amount much as arguments since this is rather akin to nit picking. You have to understand that this is not a guidebook where they constantly feed you direct lines. This is a complex story about philosophy where a lot of metaphorical jargons are thrown around to get to the point. (Not to mention it's a Chinese game xD)
Also, Stigma is just Imaginary. Whenever you are talking about Stigma, you should also note that it's imaginary. Imaginary properties are also largely explained in other parts. Please for the last time I would request, don't take a single arc out of whole story. Otherwise, this won't end.
 
Weaver himself has admitted that "forms" in Honkai don't actually fit with Plato's theory of forms, and on top of that, I've given evidence and reasons as to why the "allegory of the cave" passage cannot be used as evidence for upwards R>F (or 1-A by extension). In light of that, are you still neutral about the thread, or do you disagree? Your input would be appreciated.
That "reason" is completely faulty. Just because the word 'shadow' was used, doesn't mean it's referring to the cave analogy.

"Shadow cast by the real Kevin Kaslana in the past" refers to the stigma created using Kevin's memories. If you look back, 'Stigmas' are built off narratives, aka stories. Kevin's memories are just the basis for which Project stigma is based on. And according to Dr. MEI, the one who started the project, "narratives arise from fiction, but transcend reality".

The Will of Stigmata is an artificial consciousness created to commence Project Stigma, almost as if it was Kevin's will, hence 'shadow of Kevin Kaslana' (the term 'shadow' has been used prior to refer to entities which represent the will of another entity, ex the herrschers being the shadow of the cocoon).

As for Kevin being the flame, he at this point already had a fragment of the Finality/HotE, and is planning to use that to enable project stigma, aka 'guide Humanity from the cave to the real world'. It is incredibly reasonable for him to calm himself the 'flame'.

Also, stigma and humans are not switching places. Project stigma involves moving humanity into the stigma space, which is directly referred to as the world of ideas. Nothing is becoming 'less' real.
 
Since, Kevin is the one who started the Kaslana Stigma, it's only right to call it Kevin's Shadow. But not in the way of cave theory. This is a story, not a guidebook so we can't take words by words

Are they real observers? What? They are just giving allegories to the current circumstances. There's really nothing to say about that. [emphasis added]
Exactly. None of this can be taken literally. Consequently, it cannot be used as proof for 1-A scaling.
Uldmaster said they are just speculating but Imaginary being the true essence and other quality factors are proven in other parts of story. Just taking one arc out of the whole story and saying it's not valid just because some characters in story are speculating is so wrong.
Whether or not the stuff about Imaginary being the "true essence" and whatnot is completely irrelevant to the cave analogy and whether it is literal or consistent.
Here's how it will happen step by step
Yes, that's precisely what I said. Humans go to Stigmata Space, and Stigmata go into the human world and replace humans. They switch places. No one goes to a level of reality that has R>F over baseline reality.
 
Exactly. None of this can be taken literally. Consequently, it cannot be used as proof for 1-A scaling.
This is going to extreme. Do you even understand what storytelling is? Just because one instant can't be taken literally, the rest also can't be taken literally. What? In your way of storytelling, the author must only writes facts or only write poetic lines, not somewhere in between?
Whether or not the stuff about Imaginary being the "true essence" and whatnot is completely irrelevant to the cave analogy and whether it is literal or consistent.
Irrelevant? While I literally proved in the OP that Stigma space is just Imaginary space? This is extreme denial. You guys keep dissecting the whole OP into little portions where you can nitpick without considering the other parts which is honestly frustrating.
Yes, that's precisely what I said. Humans go to Stigmata Space, and Stigmata go into the human world and replace humans. They switch places. No one goes to a level of reality that has R>F over baseline reality.
No. Stigma never goes to humans world. Only thoughts in stigmata are given forms which will become new humans. Your reading comprehension is on the another level -_-
 
That "reason" is completely faulty. Just because the word 'shadow' was used, doesn't mean it's referring to the cave analogy.

Also, stigma and humans are not switching places. Project stigma involves moving humanity into the stigma space, which is directly referred to as the world of ideas. Nothing is becoming 'less' real.
If you want to say that "shadows" already have a context within Honkai that lacks R>F implications, you have to be consistent. What makes it imply R>F all of a sudden when it comes to the cave allegory? All of the stuff I cited including the cave allegory was in the same conversation btw.

On top of that, even with all of your attempts to explain away the inconsistencies of the framing of the analogy, you still cannot explain away the inconsistency that the Stigmata like the Will of Stigmata simultaneously act as observers trapped inside of the cave and as everything true outside of the cave. It's quite clear that this allegory cannot be taken as a literal, definitive framework where stigmata have R>F over the human world.

And no, they are in fact switching places even if you want to claim it isn't a matter of R>F. Humans move into stigma space, yes, but they are replaced by stigmata that inherit their civilization.
 
Yes, that's precisely what I said. Humans go to Stigmata Space, and Stigmata go into the human world and replace humans. They switch places. No one goes to a level of reality that has R>F over baseline reality.
No. I'll put it back into the cave analogy. What project Stigma is trying to do is make the shadows physical objects, and then casting a new shadow. The objects that were originally used to cast the shadows don't become the shadow.

As for the 'speculation'. They aren't speculating about anything. They are giving analogies to explain what their plan is. The only possible 'speculation' is "don't tell me you've taken yourself as the flame", which, may I remind you, is one of the points against 1-A hoyo. If you wanna say this is invalid, go ahead. Saves me the time from having to explain the Finality Kevin shit again.
 
No. I'll put it back into the cave analogy. What project Stigma is trying to do is make the shadows physical objects, and then casting a new shadow. The objects that were originally used to cast the shadows don't become the shadow.
That's just you inserting headcanon to try to patch up an incoherent analogy. I'm not trying to make an be-all and end-all interpretation of the text myself by the way, I'm just pointing out the flaws in your explanation.

In the end, you're claiming that Honkai suddenly goes from using "shadow" as a non-R>F word to a word that literally indicates R>F in the exact same conversation. You have not provided any reason to believe this. As we know from our standards, simply having an analogy is not enough to substantiate claims of R>F. Why does this analogy have to be "literal" when "shadow" is so often used as a non-R>F term in Honkai?

And as further support for my claim that stigmata don't actually have R>F over baseline reality in Honkai, they're directly compared to "fictional characters," further supporting the switching interpretation (although even that isn't absolute).
 
you still cannot explain away the inconsistency that the Stigmata like the Will of Stigmata simultaneously act as observers trapped inside of the cave and as everything true outside of the cave
Will of stigma acting as observer? In case you didn't know, you can also watch chapter 31 ex on YouTube to get better context instead of just reading the transcript.

??? is Mobius who is talking to Kevin. They are both members of Flamechasers of previous era. They are talking in a underground vault where ice capsules are placed for current era.
 
And as further support for my claim that stigmata don't actually have R>F over baseline reality in Honkai, they're directly compared to "fictional characters," further supporting the switching interpretation (although even that isn't absolute)
Imaginary is also fiction from the perspective of Reality. It's more clear in spiritual Adam explanation where humans see imaginary entity Spiritual Adam as a product of their dreams but for the spiritual Adam, it's the opposite. From the perspective of a higher world, humans are fiction while from the perspective of reality, imaginary is fiction. Either way, R>F is clearly proven
 
Will of stigma acting as observer? In case you didn't know, you can also watch chapter 31 ex on YouTube to get better context instead of just reading the transcript.

??? is Mobius who is talking to Kevin. They are both members of Flamechasers of previous era. They are talking in a underground vault where ice capsules are placed for current era.
Fine. There's still no reason to believe that they just begin to use "shadow" as a term literally denoting R>F all of a sudden when it's consistently used in a non-R>F context elsewhere in Honkai. It being an analogy is not sufficient proof that "shadow" in that context literally denotes Stigmata having R>F over the normal world, especially considering the fact that another analogy compares the Stigmata to fictional characters.
Imaginary is also fiction from the perspective of Reality. It's more clear in spiritual Adam explanation where humans see imaginary entity Spiritual Adam as a product of their dreams but for the spiritual Adam, it's the opposite. From the perspective of a higher world, humans are fiction while from the perspective of reality, imaginary is fiction. Either way, R>F is clearly proven
You're claiming that the supposed R>F is two-way? That's a blatant disqualifier.
 
There's still no reason to believe that they just begin to use "shadow" as a term literally denoting R>F all of a sudden when it's consistently used in a non-R>F context elsewhere in Honkai
Because that's what you believe in? Bro, it's their story, they will write as they want. If you played Hoyo games and HI3, you will understand what we are dealing here. If you aren't convinced, I don't know what to explain more than just saying "Go play the game".
It being an analogy is not sufficient proof that "shadow" in that context literally denotes Stigmata having R>F over the normal world, especially considering the fact that another analogy compares the Stigmata to fictional characters.
I agree that analogies aren't enough for real R>F but these analogies are proven and other times stated outright without using analogies at all. It's very obvious if you don't take the whole OP pieces by pieces.
You're claiming that the supposed R>F is two-way? That's a blatant disqualifier.
It's just perspective. You are arguing from lower world's perspective while I am proposing of overall cosmology structure from a higher view as a consumer. Our opinions are bound to clash.
 
Because that's what you believe in? Bro, it's their story, they will write as they want. If you played Hoyo games and HI3, you will understand what we are dealing here. If you aren't convinced, I don't know what to explain more than just saying "Go play the game".

I agree that analogies aren't enough for real R>F but these analogies are proven and other times stated outright without using analogies at all. It's very obvious if you don't take the whole OP pieces by pieces.

It's just perspective. You are arguing from lower world's perspective while I am proposing of overall cosmology structure from a higher view as a consumer. Our opinions are bound to clash.
Just to note “play the game or look at it from the perspective of the whole cosmology” isn't really a grounded argument, just saying.
 
I agree that analogies aren't enough for real R>F but these analogies are proven and other times stated outright without using analogies at all. It's very obvious if you don't take the whole OP pieces by pieces.
No they aren't. The other factors you brought up like imaginary/stigmata being the "true essence" of the cosmos that shapes reality says nothing of how valid those analogies are in terms of proving R>F.
 
Just to note “play the game or look at it from the perspective of the whole cosmology” isn't really a grounded argument, just saying.
I really don't mean to be rude at all but this is honestly getting too frustrating when Telomera keeps saying an author can't write one statement literally one time and write another statement poetically another time. That's how Chinese games are. I really don't know how to explain that other than saying to play the game since that's the only way you can experience the story properly
 
I really don't mean to be rude at all but this is honestly getting too frustrating when Telomera keeps saying an author can't write one statement literally one time and write another statement poetically another time.
They can. The issue is that you haven't proven that they did. Hopefully this is all I'll have to say and the staff will finally resolve this thread.
 
They can. The issue is that you haven't proven that they did. Hopefully this is all I'll have to say and the staff will finally resolve this thread.
Nonetheless, I appreciate your inputs. But I also want you to play the game and experience the story if you are going it continue making downgrades. So, we don't have to deal this kind of situations anymore.
 
That's just you inserting headcanon to try to patch up an incoherent analogy. I'm not trying to make an be-all and end-all interpretation of the text myself by the way, I'm just pointing out the flaws in your explanation.
Will of Stigmata: Yes. Their consciousness will be converted into an existence the same as Stigmata and recede to the interstice of the Imaginary world. Correspondingly...

Will of Stigmata: The thoughts in Stigmata will be given form, gradually descend to the external space, and replace people in their sleep.

The humans will become stigma, ascend into the stigma space. Then, the stigmata will be given form, like the molds casting a shadow on the wall. The stigmata will replace humans, not become humans. I can replace a fictional character with myself, it doesn't mean I've now become a fictional character.

In the end, you're claiming that Honkai suddenly goes from using "shadow" as a non-R>F word to a word that literally indicates R>F in the exact same conversation. You have not provided any reason to believe this. As we know from our standards, simply having an analogy is not enough to substantiate claims of R>F. Why does this analogy have to be "literal" when "shadow" is so often used as a non-R>F term in Honkai?
Yes, because that's how linguistics works. A words can have different meaning in the same conversation. I can talk about a watermelon being tasty and in the same conversation talk about a watermelon being heavy. The cave analogy isn't brought up until the very end of the conversation, so it's unreasonable to assume that they were talking about 'shadows' in that context at any earlier point in the conversation.

And as further support for my claim that stigmata don't actually have R>F over baseline reality in Honkai, they're directly compared to "fictional characters," further supporting the switching interpretation (although even that isn't absolute).
the original line in chinese is

“如果书本和故事中的人纷纷降临于世,独自构筑起一个世界,独自像未来延伸自己的无限可能……你认为这样的一个世界,比起当前的人类世界又如何?”
Which translates to
"If characters from books and stories were to descend upon the world, create their own world, and extend their infinite possibilities into the future......How do you think a world like this, compares to the current human world."

The Will of Stigmata is drawing the comparison between the world created by normal humans and the possible world that could be created by Stigmata, the idealized version of humans.
 
Yes, because that's how linguistics works. A words can have different meaning in the same conversation. I can talk about a watermelon being tasty and in the same conversation talk about a watermelon being heavy. The cave analogy isn't brought up until the very end of the conversation, so it's unreasonable to assume that they were talking about 'shadows' in that context at any earlier point in the conversation.
What exactly makes you think that "shadow" suddenly indicates actual R>F in the cave allegory? Analogies alone aren't enough proof for R>F, there needs to be further context showing that the higher level is literally more real than the lower level. And while "shadow" being used one way in a different context doesn't necessarily indicate its usage in every context, the fact that "shadow" is consistently used in a non-R>F context does at the very least imply that it isn't being used in an R>F context in the cave allegory.

Also, the analogy still isn't consistent. Unless this is another weird aspect of the translation, Mobius says that the shadows on the cave are the world to them even though the world, including Earth, is full of Honkai. OP pointed out the fact that the Honkai is in fact a form of Imaginary, so scaling Imaginary as having R>F over the "shadows" would require scaling Imaginary above itself. That is nonsensical.

There is also no consistent way to frame what each part of the analogy even represents. If Imaginary is all that is true outside of the cave, who are the observers? The observers clearly aren't humans because they're the shadows. Mobius talks as if she and Kevin are observers, but that makes no sense either. They're still humans, so they would be shadows. You could argue that them having Stigmata and power over Honkai is what makes them more than just shadows, but that makes no sense either. Did the shadows jump outside of the cave to the Stigmata, become real, and then go back into the cave to be observers chained up inside of it? The allegory only makes sense if the observers were always chained up, not shadows who became observers. Who even are the shadows? Are they the world, or the humans? So much of this analogy just goes unexplained.

Additionally, the fact that Honkai is a form of Imaginary would force us to conclude that Honkai altogether has R>F over basline reality (since all quantitative divisions of a 1-A power must also be 1-A), which is just ridiculous. White Comet Kiana uses Honkai and would thus have to scale to 1-A. Even the OP seems to realize that scaling anything less than the Authorities of the Cocoon and Otto Apocalypse would be ridiculous, but fails to account for the fact that scaling Imaginary to 1-A would force you to scale literally all Honkai to 1-A as well.
 
Additionally, the fact that Honkai is a form of Imaginary would force us to conclude that Honkai altogether has R>F over basline reality (since all quantitative divisions of a 1-A power must also be 1-A), which is just ridiculous. White Comet Kiana uses Honkai and would thus have to scale to 1-A. Even the OP seems to realize that scaling anything less than the Authorities of the Cocoon and Otto Apocalypse would be ridiculous, but fails to account for the fact that scaling Imaginary to 1-A would force you to scale literally all Honkai to 1-A as well.
yk that most of this can just make haxxes go to 1-A instead? 3D mfs cant even have 1-A physicals no more and being just "form" doesnt make you on exact same level as the actual thing, but whatever this is 1-A logic.
Anyway authorities like Finality and Imaginary come directly and explicitly from an actual 1-A Sources (Cocoon and Imaginary Tree) Hence they only get the 1-A trough authority while others can still have physicals at any tier with 1-A hax.
 
yk that most of this can just make haxxes go to 1-A instead? 3D mfs cant even have 1-A physicals no more and being just "form" doesnt make you on exact same level as the actual thing, but whatever this is 1-A logic.
Anyway authorities like Finality and Imaginary come directly and explicitly from an actual 1-A Sources (Cocoon and Imaginary Tree) Hence they only get the 1-A trough authority while others can still have physicals at any tier with 1-A hax.
Yeah this, same schtick with Pathstriders and Emanators such having 1-B hax even right now which is hilariously above their Physical stats rn
 
Yeah this, same schtick with Pathstriders and Emanators such having 1-B hax even right now which is hilariously above their Physical stats rn
Yeah, even with 1-A it would be same stuff, simply taking "power" will not necessarily mean they are absolutely enhancing themself into jumping into 1-A, and in all cases of emanators and pathstriders you just get bunch of new cool powers (litteraly trailblazer)
 
What exactly makes you think that "shadow" suddenly indicates actual R>F in the cave allegory? Analogies alone aren't enough proof for R>F, there needs to be further context showing that the higher level is literally more real than the lower level. And while "shadow" being used one way in a different context doesn't necessarily indicate its usage in every context, the fact that "shadow" is consistently used in a non-R>F context does at the very least imply that it isn't being used in an R>F context in the cave allegory.
Because the shadows in the cave analogy are specifically referring to Plato's theory of forms. And if you want further proof, there's the Tree being the origin of everything, including laws and truth. Since ontologies are a thing in HI3, then the tree by extension must be thus also be the origin of all possible ontologies. Furthermore, the tree is said to treat the worlds within it as if it were data in a server, which heavily suggests R>F. As for the term 'shadow' not being used in the R>F way. I'll just put it bluntly. What else could 'shadow' mean while being used in the context of Plato's cave. In the other cases, the shadows had other possible meanings that wouldn't contradict with the Plato's cave analogy. However, there is no other possible context for 'shadow' in plato's cave analogy, unless you want to argue that they are talking about a literal cave with literal chained prisoners and a literal flame.

Also, the analogy still isn't consistent. Unless this is another weird aspect of the translation, Mobius says that the shadows on the cave are the world to them even though the world, including Earth, is full of Honkai. OP pointed out the fact that the Honkai is in fact a form of Imaginary, so scaling Imaginary as having R>F over the "shadows" would require scaling Imaginary above itself. That is nonsensical.
The world is filled with Honkai, yes. But Honkai is never EVER referred to as being from their world or being on the same level as their world. In the earlier chapters, it is thought to originate from the tree, and from the Cocoon in later chapters. The Imaginary and Real space is also suggested to have an R>F relation. The 'real space' is a unique case in the infinite amounts of 'Imaginary spaces', but is also the only space that can produce 'meaning'. Everything that exists in the Imaginary Space, unless given appropriate 'abstraction' or 'projection', will be meaningless to humans.

Aka. The Imaginary space includes everything that could possibly be, but our senses can't comprehend that. Real space is the things that we can actually comprehend. This lines up quite nicely with Plato's analogy of forms.

There is also no consistent way to frame what each part of the analogy even represents. If Imaginary is all that is true outside of the cave, who are the observers? The observers clearly aren't humans because they're the shadows. Mobius talks as if she and Kevin are observers, but that makes no sense either. They're still humans, so they would be shadows. You could argue that them having Stigmata and power over Honkai is what makes them more than just shadows, but that makes no sense either. Did the shadows jump outside of the cave to the Stigmata, become real, and then go back into the cave to be observers chained up inside of it? The allegory only makes sense if the observers were always chained up, not shadows who became observers. Who even are the shadows? Are they the world, or the humans? So much of this analogy just goes unexplained.
The answer is simple. The observers (I'm guessing you mean the prisoners) are completely irrelevant when only talking about what's 'real' and what isn't. The fire is the 'form of the good', the objects casting the shadows are 'forms', and the shadows are 'particulars'. There is no need for the prisoners. The reason Plato added it was to show how people will reject ideas that conflict with their world view. In fact, that was the main point of the entire 'theory of forms'. The observers were never given a discrete ranking in the analogy of 'forms'. The 'contradictory' statements were also given by two people under two very different contexts.

Mobius wanted to ask Kevin what he would do if he gained the ability to go to 'the true world', and WoS is telling us the relationship/difference between the humanity and the Stigma space.

Additionally, the fact that Honkai is a form of Imaginary would force us to conclude that Honkai altogether has R>F over basline reality (since all quantitative divisions of a 1-A power must also be 1-A), which is just ridiculous. White Comet Kiana uses Honkai and would thus have to scale to 1-A. Even the OP seems to realize that scaling anything less than the Authorities of the Cocoon and Otto Apocalypse would be ridiculous, but fails to account for the fact that scaling Imaginary to 1-A would force you to scale literally all Honkai to 1-A as well.
Yeah, it forces the entire hoyoverse cosmology to 1-A. I don't see anything wrong with that.

Jokes aside, the Honkai isn't a magic power source that makes everyone that contact it a god.

1. While it is an energy source, even a small dosage of it can be lethal. And even for beings with incredibly high honkai resistance, Honkai overdoes is still possible. Even for herrschers, the amount of honkai that they can hold in their body is finite.

2. Only herrscher cores have the ability to utilize Honkai to its full potential. Without it, honkai energy is basically just a stat amp. Aka, only those with access to herrscher cores can qualify for 1-A via Honkai energy.

For scaling, this would mean that only the top tiers of the verse (herrschers, MOTHs, Otto) would scale to this tier. And while, yes, that is nearly everyone, it's not all of their versions, especially the earlier battlesuits. In fact, it averages out to less than one 1-A level battlesuit per character. (Excluding Kiana for having like 5 herrscher forms, and Durandal for having the abyss flower in basically every battlesuit).

And I already see the "1-A beings can't be defeated by lower tiers" argument coming. This can be dealt with by remembering that the herrschers don't have an infinite energy pool to draw from. Herrscher authorities uses Honkai energy, and since the amount of honkai within a herrscher is finite, the first few herrschers could be dealt with simply by stalling them out until they run out of energy. And then once the divine keys are made, they would be of equal tiers anyway.

And no, this isn't an anti-feat for 1-A because they are either being defeated while not having a 1-A tier of power, or they are being defeated by a 1-A tier.
 
yk that most of this can just make haxxes go to 1-A instead? 3D mfs cant even have 1-A physicals no more and being just "form" doesnt make you on exact same level as the actual thing, but whatever this is 1-A logic.
Anyway authorities like Finality and Imaginary come directly and explicitly from an actual 1-A Sources (Cocoon and Imaginary Tree) Hence they only get the 1-A trough authority while others can still have physicals at any tier with 1-A hax.
Honkai "comes directly and explicitly" from Imaginary as well, which is 1-A according to OP. And according to our standards, even an infinitesmal fraction of 1-A power is still 1-A, no matter how small, so their Honkai power would be 1-A as well.
 
Honkai "comes directly and explicitly" from Imaginary as well, which is 1-A according to OP. And according to our standards, even an infinitesmal fraction of 1-A power is still 1-A, no matter how small, so their Honkai power would be 1-A as well.
I don't see anything wrong with that considering that's basically the situation in current Hoyoverse right now lmao, except it's 1-B
 
Honkai "comes directly and explicitly" from Imaginary as well, which is 1-A according to OP. And according to our standards, even an infinitesmal fraction of 1-A power is still 1-A, no matter how small, so their Honkai power would be 1-A as well.
please quote it, since the Op part just says it is a "type" and it comes from imaginary space but that does not mean honkai is automatically at same level as imaginary energy
But again like i said it can just extend to smurf hax being 1-A theres no reason to assume white comet kiana is 1-A (or anyone else) from using honkai energy when she cant even sustain enough energy before getting corrupted
 
Yeah, it forces the entire hoyoverse cosmology to 1-A. I don't see anything wrong with that.

Jokes aside, the Honkai isn't a magic power source that makes everyone that contact it a god.

1. While it is an energy source, even a small dosage of it can be lethal. And even for beings with incredibly high honkai resistance, Honkai overdoes is still possible. Even for herrschers, the amount of honkai that they can hold in their body is finite.

2. Only herrscher cores have the ability to utilize Honkai to its full potential. Without it, honkai energy is basically just a stat amp. Aka, only those with access to herrscher cores can qualify for 1-A via Honkai energy.

For scaling, this would mean that only the top tiers of the verse (herrschers, MOTHs, Otto) would scale to this tier. And while, yes, that is nearly everyone, it's not all of their versions, especially the earlier battlesuits. In fact, it averages out to less than one 1-A level battlesuit per character. (Excluding Kiana for having like 5 herrscher forms, and Durandal for having the abyss flower in basically every battlesuit).

And I already see the "1-A beings can't be defeated by lower tiers" argument coming. This can be dealt with by remembering that the herrschers don't have an infinite energy pool to draw from. Herrscher authorities uses Honkai energy, and since the amount of honkai within a herrscher is finite, the first few herrschers could be dealt with simply by stalling them out until they run out of energy. And then once the divine keys are made, they would be of equal tiers anyway.

And no, this isn't an anti-feat for 1-A because they are either being defeated while not having a 1-A tier of power, or they are being defeated by a 1-A tier.
basically this minus herrschers having 1-A physicals as thats not possible for 3D beings anymore (get bde 2 cores 🔥)
 
Because the shadows in the cave analogy are specifically referring to Plato's theory of forms.
We've already discussed earlier in this thread that Plato's theory of forms doesn't actually fit with Honkai at all since Forms in Platonism are completely immutable and unable to be altered by particulars, whereas "forms" and stigmata are undergo change all the time, caused both by themselves and even sometimes by the world. At best, Plato's Theory of Forms shares some similarities. Even Weaver261 agreed that Plato's Theory of Forms doesn't actually fit with Honkai and that these analogies themselves aren't enough to justify R>F, with other context being necessary to justify interpreting them as R>F. That's ultimately what this debate comes down to: not "do these analogies prove R>F?" but "does this other context prove R>F?"

And fyi sharing similarities with Plato's theory of Forms is not enough to show that an analogy literally demonstrates R>F.

But to further explain the problems with using this analogy as proof of R>F,
The world is filled with Honkai, yes. But Honkai is never EVER referred to as being from their world or being on the same level as their world.
That still doesn't explain away the issue that Honkai is still PART of that world. Since the world is viewed as shadows on a wall, the Honkai, which is part of the world, would also be viewed as shadows on a wall as well. And that leads to contradictions.
The reason Plato added it was to show how people will reject ideas that conflict with their world view. In fact, that was the main point of the entire 'theory of forms'. The observers were never given a discrete ranking in the analogy of 'forms'. The 'contradictory' statements were also given by two people under two very different contexts.
The fact that the Will of Stigmata leaves out an entire portion of the analogy (with the shadows just being made for no reason at all) just shows that it's not meant to be a serious, coherent or comprehensive framework of Honkai's ontological relationship to humanity nor is it supposed to be a direct application of Platonism (along with how I explained that Plato's Theory of Forms just doesn't fit here). It's just a one-off statement meant to demonstrate the transient nature of humanity compared to Stigmata (which is not R>F).
Only herrscher cores have the ability to utilize Honkai to its full potential. Without it, honkai energy is basically just a stat amp. Aka, only those with access to herrscher cores can qualify for 1-A via Honkai energy.
That's not how 1-A works. You can't have a subdivision of 1-A that's so small that it becomes a lower tier. Any quantitative subdivision of 1-A power is still 1-A. If someone gets a small amount of 1-A Honkai, that small amount will still be 1-A. And we know that the difference between higher and lower levels of Honkai is just quantitative from this (the difference between Honkai on Earth and the Imaginary Tree itself is simply a matter of transfinite magnitude, which is quantitative). Ultimately, treating Imaginary as 1-A leads to all Honkai being 1-A, which makes no sense in the story.
 
please quote it, since the Op part just says it is a "type" and it comes from imaginary space but that does not mean honkai is automatically at same level as imaginary energy
But again like i said it can just extend to smurf hax being 1-A theres no reason to assume white comet kiana is 1-A (or anyone else) from using honkai energy when she cant even sustain enough energy before getting corrupted
OP equates it with Imaginary based on it being described as "imaginary internal energy."

White comet kiana only being able to use a small amount of honkai energy is irrelevant because any division of 1-A power is still 1-A, no matter how small.
 
OP equates it with Imaginary based on it being described as "imaginary internal energy."

White comet kiana only being able to use a small amount of honkai energy is irrelevant because any division of 1-A power is still 1-A, no matter how small.
okay but that only proves honkai hax being 1-A so... i dont know what is even argued here at this point.
can we get Op to write down big ass summary and finish this?
 
Plato's theory of forms doesn't actually fit with Honkai at all since Forms in Platonism are completely immutable and unable to be altered by particulars, whereas "forms" and stigmata are undergo change all the time
As I have said before, whether it fits the strict definition of theory of forms or not, we don't really need it to be fit perfectly to have 1-A since 1-A isn't tier 0 where mutability becomes a disqualifier. What we are arguing here is how Honkai drew inspiration from this theory to explain what's real and what isn't.
OP equates it with Imaginary based on it being described as "imaginary internal energy."

White comet kiana only being able to use a small amount of honkai energy is irrelevant because any division of 1-A power is still 1-A, no matter how small.
We all are taught this in chapter 2
Fu Hua : You'll be fighting more than Honkai Beasts. The Honkai manifests itself in many ways.
Honkai manifest itself in many ways. Honkai is a force of chaos that will destroy civilization. As civilization grew and become more advanced (having more order = negative entropy), the balance must be made somewhere to rise the entropy which is Honkai Energy.
The concept of "anti-space", or "imaginary space", is akin to these pillars that defy existence in reality: it fundamentally opposes our physical constants, our "real world". Phenomena impossible in reality might be commonplace on that side. In connection to the hypothesis regarding the Great Eruption, as our civilisation continues to evolve, accumulating negative entropy within its internal cycle, the corresponding "Imaginary Internal Energy", or Honkai energy, also rises in tandem.
So, Honkai energy != Honkai. Honkai energy is generated through the development of negative entropy.

To clarify this, only those who have access to Honkai or Imaginary will have 1-A. Using Honkai or Imaginary energy (like path energy) will not result in 1-A.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top