• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

1-A / High 1-A / Tier 0 Revisions Hub

1A thread can this add to queue
 
Its Low 1-C because i made the thread before the new standard have been applied, can you check the thread if its qualified to have R>F T by any chance?
Queue pls?
 
Are you changing your proposal of R>F to 1-A? If so, you should do that otherwise your thread won’t be queued because it doesn’t contain 1-A/High 1-A/0 stuff.
I made that thread before the new system have been applied, and i see Yumellia up there getting queued no problem.

But alr.
 
That somehow constitutes as “religious” since we're taking a lot of God's characters or religiously inspired things. Such as Krishna, Shiva, and “God.” Pretty Mahayana could be more of a teaching school to learn about the Trikaya and Adi-Budhha rather than an actual religion.

So whats your stance on that? Seems like you're just picking and choosing.
 
That somehow constitutes as “religious” since we're taking a lot of God's characters or religiously inspired things. Such as Krishna, Shiva, and “God.” Pretty Mahayana could be more of a teaching school to learn about the Trikaya and Adi-Budhha rather than an actual religion.

So whats your stance on that? Seems like you're just picking and choosing.
You can say the same thing about Hinduism.
 
You can say the same thing about Hinduism.
Hinduism incorporates belief, devotees, and metaphysical. Buddhism ignores most of it as a way of life and understanding the nature of things rather than what caused it through metaphysical means. It doesn't require worship, it is blatantly simple what it is.

Hinduism has gods, devas, and creation origin which is why I would count it as religious, but I haven't found a reason why not Buddhism as non-religious. Given Ultima wants to use Platonism/Neoplatonism conception of Monad, through philosophical means and somehow we couldn't do that to Buddhism. I mean Ultima didn't use the Gnostics side as that's technically religious and their interpretation of Monad is called the “One.” Buddhism should be allowed free, but I can't say that for Hinduism unless it's a TV series or comics.
 
Given Ultima wants to use Platonism/Neoplatonism conception of Monad, through philosophical means and somehow we couldn't do that to Buddhism. I mean Ultima didn't use the Gnostics side as that's technically religious and their interpretation of Monad is called the “One.” Buddhism should be allowed free, but I can't say that for Hinduism unless it's a TV series or comics.
I've just used Platonic concepts as introductory tools for people who've never heard of these things whatsoever (Said 'things' not being exclusively a part of these philosophies, as I never tire of explaining). You'd have a point if I was flat-out making profiles for things like Nous or the One, but that's not what is being done, and nor is it something that will ever be done. Making profiles for Buddhism is simply a "No," sorry.

And, for the matter, you shouldn't clutter the thread with this shit.
 
I've just used Platonic concepts as introductory tools for people who've never heard of these things whatsoever (Said 'things' not being exclusively a part of these philosophies, as I never tire of explaining). You'd have a point if I was flat-out making profiles for things like Nous or the One, but that's not what is being done, and nor is it something that will ever be done. Making profiles for Buddhism is simply a "No," sorry.
The root of the question was “does this count as religious” as we could just take the philosophical concept for the basis of 0, I was not at all trying to scale “Buddhism” itself nor make that being into a profile. That much you miss in its entirety.
And, for the matter, you shouldn't clutter the thread with this shit.

Alright, to make sure, I'm not derailing here is a closed thread that I’ll plan on revisiting to be opened up later for DC to get 1-A. Add it to the queue chief.

 
Queue.

 
This thread is closed but I plan to revise it correctly and add the tiers. So add to the queue chief.

 
 
This thread is closed but I plan to revise it correctly and add the tiers. So add to the queue chief.

Make another thread, also.
 
Tier 0 Thread. It's pretty straight forward and simple
 
Last edited:
please no
 
please no
Nah bro please. Just let Ultima check. He accept or reject is up to his opinion.
 
Airheaded Goddess approves of this comment.

kombMdd.jpeg



Memes aside yea, it's probably the easiest 1-A thread to go through.
 
This thread needs to be put on with one of the sections since it has all the tiers: 0, High 1-A, and 1-A. However, I believe the 0 aspect takes precedence and the Root thread is taking a while.

 
This thread needs to be put on with one of the sections since it has all the tiers: 0, High 1-A, and 1-A. However, I believe the 0 aspect takes precedence and the Root thread is taking a while.

No. If the thread has a 1-A element to it, then it will go down the 1-A queue and wait for its turn in there. That's why the White Light thread was opened before the Umineko thread, for instance, even if the Umineko thread was technically here first.

Also, is the broader topic on which those revisions hinge (Whether to separate DeMatteis' writings from the rest of Marvel) even resolved? If it isn't, then wait for that to be wrapped up and then make a separate thread tackling the tiering.
 
Also, is the broader topic on which those revisions hinge (Whether to separate DeMatteis' writings from the rest of Marvel) even resolved? If it isn't, then wait for that to be wrapped up and then make a separate thread tackling the tiering.
It has both aspects and has been open for a while. I feel it is rather unnecessary to make another one when two things can be tackled in the same thread.

More importantly, we haven't gotten a lot of mods on the thread yet. Typically, if it involves you then it gets more attention from the mods.
 
It has both aspects and has been open for a while. I feel it is rather unnecessary to make another one when two things can be tackled in the same thread.
It is necessary when the two aspects being revised are unrelated to each other. This thread is strictly for tiering CRTs, not canon-adjustment ones. Your thread involves the latter, and therefore should have that matter be solved before being presented here, since it will only be presented here if the canon split is accepted, anyway.
 
Back
Top