This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Most modern grenades are 9-B but they use better charges to inflict more damage. It's why Jason took a 200kj grenade at close range and got back up but a direct contact hit caused notable damage.
I'm not seeing how you get consistent when he dies or gets wounded by explicitly less force multiple times. The precursor novel to the Hell Lake feat for example has an grenade launcher destroy his body with a couple direct shots.
So in my mind the LQ only has one win condition, and that's emptying his mind and tapping into his full power. Other than that one method I think they get AP stomped in a direct fight.
With that in mind however, the LQ when filled with the correct amount of determination to live, can endless...
I gave my reasoning earlier
I mean he gave his evidence and reasoning. To him those were sufficient. Though ultimately I get what you're talking about.
If he disagrees then it's a disagreement. Feeling like it's wrong doesn't make it invalid.
For the thread I think the feat is 4-B, I just think it explodes. So it would be the Dragon Ball SPC calc and not a create a giant orb calc.
The first is about the multiverse itself, the second requires context and the last is still based on personal choices being performed. Which is a finite number repeated by an unknown, but possibly infinite value.
The monitors statement would still be 2-B, since it's based on choice. So it's a finite number x a finite number over a timeframe. The only way to get 2A is to assume an infinite timeframe, but if the universes die then that doesn't work.
So I just see 2B overall and not 2A, which is what this...
The reason it was picked as healing afaik is because of the following:
If Myers requires feeding off the evil or fear of others to recover from damage, that's not really a passive thing. Its a direct action of an ability.
In WW #38 she moves an island that when removed from Earth, created the entire pacific ocean and then yeeted a planet destroying asteroid into deep space.
EDIT: Added scans
EDIT 2: In WW#72 she also moves the moon into another dimension after it was teleported there. The plane still flying...
F
But for Superman during the GA I think his next best feat is moving a Pluto sized planet in Superman #58 (1949) and throwing a moon at another moon hard enough to cause a new star to form. Additional in Superman #66 (1950) he pushes a planet the size of Earth into a smaller planet, with the...
I wasn't involved with the scaling logic, but from memory most people don't treat that Gohan was SS2 against Dabura. In the manga Akira was pretty consistent with drawing SS2 with the lightning aura and the extra spiky hair which isn't present with Gohan vs Dabura. Additionally you see Gohan go...
I agreed to it. Though if the statements don't qualify for evidence then it would just be back to my original stance of incalculable not meaning anything tiering wise.
I'm not seeing that
The Databook is talking about the power contained inside the orb, that when it explodes, can destroy the dimension.
It would just be an Earth based spherical explosion afaik. Which is like 4-B based off the Super Perfect Cell calc.
Idk.
The math is that a finite number repeated infinitely isn't enough and neither is a normal infinity.
You need infinity multiplied to the power of infinity to get Aleph-1.
Doesn't work = Multiverse where there's infinite different choices or parallel worlds = Example D&D's Mortal Plane or...
For destroying both, yes. But that wouldn't give you size of the ETSB, but the explosive radius.
If the assumption is that the ETSB was going to explode before she was sealed, then it's maximum size was what we saw in the manga.
It shouldn't be the astronomical unit distance unless it was the size of the solar system. The actual calc using this method would be: ETSB Volume / TSB Volume * TSB Energy.
Because even if taken at face value and ignoring every onscreen visual issue, it would be an outlier for everyone involved and makes every subsequent event in every film questionable.
This is more or less the exact same thread that's been reposted from Comicvine like three times now. It's a 4-A to 3-A upgrade proposal for anyone who scales to Thor and it's been rejected every single time it's been brought up.
You're supposed to add them. But if you need names then CloverDragon, Glassman and myself have disagreed with the proposal. With Phoenks expressing disapproval without further clarification on some points.
In my view, since a 5D space can contain an infinite number of 4D spaces, then each universe could just have a non-substainal 5th axis and be contained within it.
However, if those universes are depicted as tiny orbs within a larger space, then that larger space would likely need to be fully...
They don't meet the criteria for light. They don't travel in beams, in the slow-mo scene with A-train you can see sparks moving when tbe blasts are and nothing calls them SoL.
It's why Butcher and Homelander's beams aren't treated as SoL, since they lack those statements.
I don't see why it would, because the scene occurred as a trap for Jason that they had assembled together.
Deadite Jason rams Uber-Jason into some walls, is overpowered and then rapidly killed.