• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

4-B Kaguya (this is useless and I'm wasting my time 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥)

Damage3245 said:
So assuming that Kaguya creating an Expansive Truth-Seeking Orb with an assumed radius 149 million kilometers over an assumed timeframe of 15 years
Click to expand...
Aren't both of these minimal assumptions possible?
David even used below minimal
Damage3245 said:
in a nutshell though I just don't buy the premise that because a Truth-Seeking Orb of a certain size contains a certain amount of power (a laughably low forest-busting amount) that means that means we can assume anything made of "Truth-Seeking Orb" substance contains a proportional amount of power to size.
Click to expand...
That's a reasonable assumption. Because:
1. Minimal energy per volume value should exist.
2. There isn't any reason to assume that initial fist-sized TSB had more energy per volume than minimal needed.(since it's a EEing ball)
 
With the amount of "no one scales to ETSO kaguya " i've ever seen I would not have guessed that one day we would contest it being an outlier. Anyways I'm neutral on the thread
 
Samlex1234 said:
1.Strawman Fallacy: You're dismissing the idea of proportional scaling by mocking the "forest-busting" claim rather than addressing the actual point. The debate isn't about whether smaller TSOs are laughably weak; it's about whether Kaguya's Expansive Truth-Seeking Orb (ETSO) could logically scale in power based on its size and mechanics. You are Ignoring that core aspect of the argument. If the size of a fist contains x energy, then the size of a sun contains x energy.
Click to expand...
My point wasn't that the energy inside normal Truth-Seeking Orbs was too low, but that there's nothing directly supporting the assumption of the mechanics involved here.

Samlex1234 said:
2. Argument from Personal Incredulity: Simply saying, "I don’t buy the premise" isn't a valid argument. You’re dismissing the proportional scaling claim without giving any logical reason or evidence to counter it. Just because you find it hard to believe doesn’t automatically make it wrong.
Click to expand...
No kidding; of course it doesn't make it automatically wrong. I didn't write that as some kind of automatic debunk; I was explaining why I wasn't convinced by the OP and therefore cannot vote in favor of it.

Samlex1234 said:
3. Appeal to Ignorance:You argue that no one in the verse has shown Brown Dwarf Star-level chakra output, so it must not be true. Just because something hasn't been shown directly doesn’t mean it can’t exist within the verse’s most especially for a final attack of the final villain of a show(Naruto).You’re also ignoring the fact that Kaguya’s ETSO draws energy from the shinobi world. “By the way don't forget that right now Kaguya doesn't even scale to ETSO”.
Click to expand...
It didn't say "it must not be true" anywhere in my post, did I? I have to consider based on what's presented in the OP and from my knowledge of the series whether it's likely or unlikely to be true and I'm not seeing enough evidence for me to consider it to be likely to be accurate.


I didn't say anywhere you had to agree with me; I'm sure plenty of people will be convinced that the assumptions in the OP are valid and there is nothing wrong with upgrading Kaguya's ETSO to that level. Doesn't mean I'm automatically convinced though.



If you want to go into fallacies that we can say that the OP is committing an Association Fallacy:

This is when someone claims that since A has certain qualities, and B is in some way associated with A, then B has those qualities as well, without actual proof of this.
Click to expand...

Since Obito's & Naruto's Truth-Seeking Orbs has a certain quality (forest-busting power while they're the size of a fist), and Kaguya's ETSO is associated with them, then it automatically has the same level of power in each bit of its volume.

There's no actual proof that it definitely works like this as far as I can tell.
 
Last edited:
Damage3245 said:
Since Obito's & Naruto's Truth-Seeking Orbs has a certain quality (forest-busting power while they're the size of a fist), and Kaguya's ETSO is associated with them, then it automatically has the same level of power in each bit of its volume.

There's no actual proof that it definitely works like this as far as I can tell.
Click to expand...
I thought there was a statement that they were exactly the same asides from size difference.
 
Damage3245 said:
I don't have a lot of time to commit to the thread right now; in a nutshell though I just don't buy the premise that because a Truth-Seeking Orb of a certain size contains a certain amount of power (a laughably low forest-busting amount) that means that means we can assume anything made of "Truth-Seeking Orb" substance contains a proportional amount of power to size.
Click to expand...
The ETSO is said to be identical to the TSO on Narutos back but only much bigger in dimensions. These aren't assumptions, the energy per meter squared is literally stated to be identical.
Damage3245 said:
So assuming that Kaguya creating an Expansive Truth-Seeking Orb with an assumed radius 149 million kilometers
Click to expand...
That is not an assumption but a standard lowball for dimensions that contain a star. I'm using our accepted standards not my own assumptions here.
Damage3245 said:
over an assumed timeframe of 15 years
Click to expand...
It's not an assumption but a logical conclusion that has already been accepted in the past.
It's also a laughable lowball given Kakashi states that they soon might be unable to return to the dimension because of the TSO growing so large, meaning it's supposed to be growing extremely fast.
Damage3245 said:
means that she'd be constantly outputting Brown Dwarf Star levels of chakra or Attack Potency every second.... (Which happens to be a level of power never displayed by anyone else in the verse before or after this by a considerable margin)
Click to expand...
And is a level nobody except IT Kaguya scales to (at least right now). And the end value is consistent with the databook saying the TSO contains enough energy to turn the world to naught.
It's also extremely disingenuous to dismiss a blatant feat just because other similar feats weren't shown. Many, MANY series here scale to certain levels simply due to a single feat.

For example Saitamas AP is 4-A possibly 3-C based on 1 feat and his next best feat is 4-C at best but we're not going to dismiss the 4-A one just because no other 4-A+ feats were shown yet. And the difference between low 5-B and high 5-A is MUCH less than better 4-C and 3-C.
Damage3245 said:
All in all, there seem to be too many assumptions to me for it to be workable.
Click to expand...
I completely disagree. Every value in the calculation is either a wiki standard or achieved as a logical conclusion.
 
After a second read, if the translation for the ETSO being "filled to the brim" and "identical to the one's on Naruto's back" are correct, then I agree. I currently don't see how both of these statements can be true without the ETSO being 4B. So until more counters are presented, put me in agree.
 
karo_senpaii said:
I thought there was a statement that they were exactly the same asides from size difference.
Click to expand...
To quote the Naruto university translation,
It’s the same as the black orbs on Naruto’s back after he used the Six Paths Sage Mode, however, their size is not comparable
Click to expand...
And the other translations are consistent with this. The word used here is as far as I could find "と同" which according to multiple people online and few MTs means "identical", "same as", or "equivalent to".
 
The 15 year timeframe is meant to have absolutely nothing to do with this CRT. That time frame is the lowball for how long it would take kaguya to recreate another dimension. This calc is for how large it would have gotten at a lowball to erase the dimension and considering kakashi's statement and the rate at which it had already grown I'd say a timeframe of an hour at max should be used. But as for if the method itself should be accepted I don't know about that
 
karo_senpaii said:
The 15 year timeframe is meant to have absolutely nothing to do with this CRT. That time frame is the lowball for how long it would take kaguya to recreate another dimension. This calc is for how large it would have gotten at a lowball to erase the dimension and considering kakashi's statement and the rate at which it had already grown I'd say a timeframe of an hour at max should be used. But as for if the method itself should be accepted I don't know about that
Click to expand...
Lowering the time frame is something I'm not against. Kakashi said that if they hid in the Kamui dimension, they wouldn't be able to come back because of how large the TSO will get. And Kakashi knows his possession of kamui has a time limit, meaning Kakashi seems to think the ETSO will engulf the dimension before his kamui time limit ends.

BUT that is a completely separate topic which should be discussed in a separate CRT. I think it's best to focus on getting the method itself accepted first.
 
Not a fan of the "it contains this power so her base (with IT chakra) is this strong for pumping chakra into it per second" argument given a character simply feeding their energy into something doesn't automatically mean their natural power would scale to it's per second of the final results, especially without a UES (This is not to say it's not possible, just that it's not always the case). That's just my opinion on that however it's already accepted on her profile so I'm not actually arguing against it, just pointing out my negative thoughts on that type of scaling.

Now I don't mind the theoretical end result energy being 4-B/Solar System level when it reaches its peak to engulf the dimension, and thus the Brown Dwarf Star rating is fine too I guess. Still a dumb technique in my opinion given it's vague end effect.
 
LordGriffin1000 said:
Not a fan of the "it contains this power so her base (with IT chakra) is this strong for pumping chakra into it per second" argument given a character simply feeding their energy into something doesn't automatically mean their natural power would scale to it's per second of the final results, especially without a UES (This is not to say it's not possible, just that it's not always the case). That's just my opinion on that however it's already accepted on her profile so I'm not actually arguing against it, just pointing out my negative thoughts on that type of scaling.

Now I don't mind the theoretical end result energy being 4-B/Solar System level when it reaches its peak to engulf the dimension, and thus the Brown Dwarf Star rating is fine too I guess. Still a dumb technique in my opinion given it's vague end effect.
Click to expand...
Her physicals don't scale to it. Never have. And that is not being proposed here either. The only thing being changed here is the Joule value. Her normal attacks won't scale to this yield, only her ETSO.
 
HelloThere1089 said:
Her physicals don't scale to it. Never have. And that is not being proposed here either. The only thing being changed here is the Joule value. Her normal attacks won't scale to this yield, only her ETSO.
Click to expand...
Her speed and lifting strength get buffed by IT Chakra, isn't her 5-B ap for the IT Chakra per second output?
 
LordGriffin1000 said:
Not a fan of the "it contains this power so her base (with IT chakra) is this strong for pumping chakra into it per second" argument given a character simply feeding their energy into something doesn't automatically mean their natural power would scale to it's per second of the final results, especially without a UES (This is not to say it's not possible, just that it's not always the case). That's just my opinion on that however it's already accepted on her profile so I'm not actually arguing against it, just pointing out my negative thoughts on that type of scaling.

Now I don't mind the theoretical end result energy being 4-B/Solar System level when it reaches its peak to engulf the dimension, and thus the Brown Dwarf Star rating is fine too I guess. Still a dumb technique in my opinion given it's vague end effect.
Click to expand...
Yeah I think the application of the ETSO to Kaguyas profile probably needs a separate CRT but that's for someone else to do 😶‍🌫️.

Can I take this as your approval of the CRT?
 
DavidTPPM said:
Yeah I think the application of the ETSO to Kaguyas profile probably needs a separate CRT but that's for someone else to do 😶‍🌫️.
Click to expand...
It's just that the way it's written on the profile makes it look like the 5-B rating is her base strength with IT chakra because it's the per second value of the ETSO which comes up next.
DavidTPPM said:
Can I take this as your approval of the CRT?
Click to expand...
Yes I agree.

HelloThere1089 said:
If I am not wrong, her 5-B is strictly for the ETSO.
Click to expand...
Then it's just my bad, it's the way it's structured on the profile. So my mistake.
 
Damage3245 said:
My point wasn't that the energy inside normal Truth-Seeking Orbs was too low, but that there's nothing directly supporting the assumption of the mechanics involved here.


No kidding; of course it doesn't make it automatically wrong. I didn't write that as some kind of automatic debunk; I was explaining why I wasn't convinced by the OP and therefore cannot vote in favor of it.


It didn't say "it must not be true" anywhere in my post, did I? I have to consider based on what's presented in the OP and from my knowledge of the series whether it's likely or unlikely to be true and I'm not seeing enough evidence for me to consider it to be likely to be accurate.


I didn't say anywhere you had to agree with me; I'm sure plenty of people will be convinced that the assumptions in the OP are valid and there is nothing wrong with upgrading Kaguya's ETSO to that level. Doesn't mean I'm automatically convinced though.



If you want to go into fallacies that we can say that the OP is committing an Association Fallacy:



Since Obito's & Naruto's Truth-Seeking Orbs has a certain quality (forest-busting power while they're the size of a fist), and Kaguya's ETSO is associated with them, then it automatically has the same level of power in each bit of its volume.

There's no actual proof that it definitely works like this as far as I can tell.
Click to expand...
Seems like you've made up your mind, and I can't fault you for that. Could you let the original poster know if you disagree or are neutral on the matter?
 
DavidTPPM said:
Yeah. I also put Damage3245 in disagree although that kinda feels like an empty vote given the lackluster reasoning and his own admitted lack of time to actually participate in the thread.

So I assume we need at least 2 more staff approvals to apply this.
Click to expand...
1 not 2.
 
DavidTPPM said:
Well I assumed that as long as there's 1 staff disagreement we should get 1 additional staff approval to balance it out.
Not sure if there are specific rules about this
Click to expand...
For a verse like Naruto, you'd probably need at least 3 staff agreements to get a Tier Upgrade through- especially with one staff disagreement.
 
DavidTPPM said:
Well I assumed that as long as there's 1 staff disagreement we should get 1 additional staff approval to balance it out.
Not sure if there are specific rules about this
Click to expand...
nah. 3-1 is good enough. ofc if u want to get an extra vote to be extra sure that's entirely up to u
 
2 votes (baseline) of agreement are required for a thread as long as they're in the majority. If 2 or more people disagree then just 1 vote of agreement more than those who disagree would suffice. 3 votes (baseline) are only required if the thread is too controversial which this one is not. So one more staff agreement should do.
 
Last edited:
UchihaSlayer96 said:
You are missing something.

Nobody is taking away from the ETSB's qualities. It is objectively the same as a regular TSB. This isn't up for discussion.
But the fact is nobody actually knows how it was going to destroy the dimension. However, my interpretation has some support to it. Yours has none. Which is why mine is the widely accepted interpretation, and yours is not.
Click to expand...
okayy
 
DavidTPPM said:
Yeah. I also put Damage3245 in disagree although that kinda feels like an empty vote given the lackluster reasoning and his own admitted lack of time to actually participate in the thread.
Click to expand...
If he disagrees then it's a disagreement. Feeling like it's wrong doesn't make it invalid.

For the thread I think the feat is 4-B, I just think it explodes. So it would be the Dragon Ball SPC calc and not a create a giant orb calc.
 
Qawsedf234 said:
If he disagrees then it's a disagreement. Feeling like it's wrong doesn't make it invalid.

For the thread I think the feat is 4-B, I just think it explodes. So it would be the Dragon Ball SPC calc and not a create a giant orb calc
Click to expand...

Hmm, I'm not faulting your logic, but what evidence do you have that it explodes?
 
Qawsedf234 said:
If he disagrees then it's a disagreement. Feeling like it's wrong doesn't make it invalid.
Click to expand...
That's why I still put him as a disagreement lol
Qawsedf234 said:
For the thread I think the feat is 4-B, I just think it explodes. So it would be the Dragom Ball SPC calc and not a create a giant orb calc.
Click to expand...
I mean I would agree but that interpretation was rejected for now in favor of the big ball one
 
Qawsedf234 said:
If he disagrees then it's a disagreement. Feeling like it's wrong doesn't make it invalid.

For the thread I think the feat is 4-B, I just think it explodes. So it would be the Dragon Ball SPC calc and not a create a giant orb calc.
Click to expand...
Also, to address something, I believe that a moderator's vote, which carries significant weight in whether a thread gets approved or not, should not be made lightly or without sufficient evidence. It's fine to disagree or agree without evidence as a participant, but when a moderator agrees or disagrees, it impacts a verse significantly. There’s a reason the neutral option exists—it should be used when there's not enough evidence to make a decisive call.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Samlex1234
Revising the Kaguya ETSO note for Accuracy and Updating.
2
Replies
42
Views
2K
Samlex1234
Samlex1234
Luxxy_Ethereal
  • Locked
Upgrade for Kaguya Otsutsuki to Multi-solar system 4-A.
Replies
9
Views
911
Damage3245
Damage3245
  • Locked
Kaguya in Naruto has L2C
Replies
16
Views
1K
UchihaSlayer96
UchihaSlayer96
RanaProGamer
  • Locked
Universal Naruto Hax CRT
Replies
36
Views
3K
Damage3245
Damage3245
Godernet
  • Locked
Hags and Kags being Divas (Naruto CRT)
2
Replies
49
Views
3K
Godernet
Godernet
Back
Top