This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
But I'm sure.
Press A Button to slip between the very fabric of space and flip between 2D and 3D! Well, what do you think? Mind blowing, isn't it? What is this A Button I speak of? I assure you that if we are being watched in another dimension... Those beings will understand...
Just by curiosity, what is the basis for stating that the Tick Tock Clock has infinite size? It's just 'cause the endless abyss, or there's something else?
@Cal Don't ask obvious questions, of course I meant that they are separated by their own series.
As for being a Star Child, why would it mean that DK and Mario will have the same levels forever, regardless of their life trajectory being different? That is to greatly simplify the classification...
Well, even though I was originally the one who proposed the move, I'm going to have to stay on the side of Cal, DRB and DDM as well (in part). It happens that the downgrades you are proposing here isn't what I was advocating a priori (do you use that term in English too? Idk).
Just to clarify...
Anyway, I have np with the Super Mario Galaxy characters being in MFTL+. For me these stats are right. The problem is to use powerscaling with even Donkey Kong and Toadette to the Super Mario Galaxy feats.
Are you talking about the destruction of the world in Chapter 6? If yes, the game stated that they survived. If you want to call it an outlier, okay, but there's no basis to say they were protected by something.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4MS6e-aXos&feature=youtu.be&t=108
The...
How does this an extra if there isn't calculation that attests the level of feat? Without calculation you can't say anything about it, for it's not a clear feat of destruction or creation of an object. Regardless of reinforcing or not, calc needed.
Ok, but why? Do you have a calc?
Thanks Cal, I'll read.
About Yoshi:
Defeated Raphael Raven, turning him into a constellation afterward. [...]
Nothing here justifies High 4-C, unless there is a calc attesting the level.
Taking advantage of the occasion, can anyone send me the thread where it was decided that the cast level would be High 4-C? I don't remember any High 4-C feat in the series. If it exists, it was probably an isolated feat, or was the result of some calculation (if there is indeed, send me the...
For this pattern, what would the High 1-A look like? Neither the dimensionless nor the transcendent are good suggestions. Unless you put one name unrelated to another. For example, "dimensionless" for 1-A and "nigh omnipotent" for High 1-A.
NOTE: IT'S ONLY AN EXAMPLE TO EXPLAIN WHAT I WANT TO...
The type IV multiverse covers all possible mathematical and logical definitions. He definitely doesn't need to mention that it includes all computability and non-duality, since he already mentions in his own definition to contain all mathematical and logical propositions (in which computability...
No limits fallacies are beside the point. This is a term used solely and exclusively in the middle of vsdebates.
Don't apply "No limits fallacies" to scientific theories, as this term was never and will never be an academic term. You can't invalidate a scientific proposition based on "it is...
@Ant Sera proposed a note in the NLF section of the fallacies page regarding the misuse of NLF claims. She proposed it because of the fact that people end up taking any "boundless" citation as fallacy, even in cases where they aren't.
@Matt It's only an extension of it in some cases, not at all. It's only a hyperbole in most cases, including in the example cited the page of fallacy itself.
@DontTalk That's not the point. What I mean is that for a thing to be considered fallacy, it doesn't depend on "the way the analyzed universe is presented." A fallacy is a false argumentative logic. It depends on the argument used by the person in debate. At most we can say "The citation you're...
Honestly, for me the NLF isn't even a fallacy in fact. A fallacy is an argument whose premises don't lead to the conclusion because logical invalidity, or a deceptive or logically inconsistent. What we call "NLF" here seems to me much more like a linguistic expression of emphasis (hyperbole)...
Taking the literalness of the prefix "omni", it is impossible to destroy an omnipresent. For to be omnipresent is to mean that its existence is in "everything", i.e, that it would still be there after being erased from existence; If it has been erased, it means that after deletion ceased to...
I just checked, and VSBW currently has nearly fifty staff members. We have enough team members to patrol all edits and keep the wiki out of control, you don't have to keep all the work for you. I would, in your case, take more time for myself and take care of my health (not only would I do it, I...
Ultra Sun and Moon Cyrus Dialga/Palkia: 2-C [Much weaker than normal].
I disagree. The screenshot didn't limit the affirmation to the CT. If we set another key to CT because of the Poké Balls, we would have to do this for all Pokémon, as this applies to everyone. We don't give extra keys...
I'm neutral about Darkrai and Cresselia, them as 2-C for their own feats is fine for me.
Lake Trio is 2-B. The Sinnoh myths put LT side-by-side with CT, they must at least be comparable to each other.
You said it's not because they have a body, but I doubt anyone would say that it was restricted if they weren't embodied. We can't say that he magically grew weaker just because "he is understandable by mortals". Mainly because concepts ALSO ARE understood by mortals from the very etymology of...
Where was it stated that they aren't the full entities? I challenged anyone to show me a link to this, so far nothing. Again: It is literally the same being, in a body. If the only basis for suggesting that it is not the full entity is just being a concept in a body, then that is exactly what...
@Kukui Why? That's just giving a body. Having one absolutely has no relation to having physical limits, many characters who have bodies are considered transcendent beings without physical limitations. It is not because they have become corporeal that they have magically gained limitations that...
And what does it have to do with "having a body" with "being sealed"? These two propositions were never synonymous. And if there is no variation in power or anything between these two inventions, there simply should not be a key that differentiates them, for being literally the same thing.
I...
I'm talking about this division into keys. And my screenshot implies this about the Poké Ball, which in absolutely nothing has to do with "sealed form" and "unsealed form". Unless there is concrete evidence that there is such a restriction as well as division, I'll state categorically that it...
This continues to force an interpretation that is not there. "Being has gained a body" and only, anything that goes beyond that (taking a new key, saying that it is sealed, and saying that one is inferior to another because it is corporeal) is pure invention.
The Red Chain doesn't restrict the...
I say that there is no division between sealed and unsealed form. This has never been suggested, asserted, implied or even speculated at any time in the entire Pokémon franchise. To say that this exists is to force an interpretation of something that has never been there, probably for some...
Not really. What would work most would be to convince the members to accept the change. If they accept, a bot can change all the pages quietly, and it would not give almost any work. I often do this myself on my wiki, which currently has almost 2,000 pages.
I didn't come here to argue or anything. I just came here to post this image, which is a higher quality version of the image that DRB posted - in case you can't read it.
As I said, I fully understand that, so I had not even touched on the subject of the revision. I just answered the young man over there.
And you should rest Ant. Even I couldn't stand to work uninterruptedly like you.
VSBW considers the configurations at the verse limit. Omnipotence IIRC posed as questionable because of paradoxes and can't be proved. However, the same doesn't apply to omniscience and omnipresence (there is no paradox that defies omniscience and omnipresence, nor is there improbability). I...