• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Ultima_Reality
Reaction score
16,500

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Some question about higher D. Isnt if some space naturally curled and twisted inside out, it indicate if there are extra dimensional axis
    So is Regulus pretty confidently gonna 1-A? I still don’t understand why being unbound by these concepts with no proof of qualitative superiority would make you unable to be harmed by things below 1-A could you explain
    0d491fd5dedb00d3cfadc39bd086f096.png
    About American Gods

    I found this
    With that, he began to walk. He remembered how he had felt on
    the carousel, tried to feel like that...
    He remembered turning the Winnebago, shifting it at right angles
    to everything. He tried to capture that sensation—
    And then, easily and perfectly, it happened.
    It was like pushing through a membrane, like plunging up from
    deep water into air. With one step he had moved from the tourist path
    on the mountain to...
    To somewhere real. He was Backstage.
    He was still on the top of a mountain, that much remained the
    same. But it was so much more than that. This mountaintop was the
    quintessence of place, the heart of things as they were. Compared to it,
    the Lookout Mountain he had left was a painting on a backdrop, or a
    papier-mâché model seen on a TV screen—merely a representation of
    the thing, not the thing itself.
    This was the true place
    . p418
    Can I have permission to comment on this topic?


    Could you comment here on the "if the feat being an outlier invalidates it being an anti-feat for 1-A" problem?
    Deagonx said you must come or SMT will be downgraded to below tiering.

    Robo432343
    Robo432343
    dude he got the ping
    no need to be so clingy about it
    Huesito88
    Huesito88
    Can never hurt to write on the wall
    Ultima, if there is a realm of concepts that has all characteristics for the concepts to be type 1 concepts, but does not have any mention of having any of the concepts that can be tiered, and has no mention of concepts of space, time, logic, infinite, mathematic , dimensions, etc., the only things the realm of concept has is it holds archetype, prototype, essence, template, etc., for all things, can it be tiered or will it depend on the cosmology? Or can we assume it has concepts like space, time, dimensions for it to be low 1A or 1A since it has concepts for all things?
    Hi Ultima, this Tier 0 thread is going on pretty long inactive. We've also planned to do collective verse page for Honkai games and Gun Girl Z if this got accepted. I've also summerized all the counter arguments and my debunks to them. I know you planned to come here one day but I hope it'd be sonner :3

    If there are infinite layers R/F, A views all of them like fiction (a R/F that beyond all hierarchy above), so A could be High 1-A? And B views A like a fiction (R/F qualified) so B could be High 1-A 1 layer?
    One simple question

    There are singularity when all plurality becomes one, the closer you get to this singularity the stronger you become, and evantually will become one it self

    Are this can make you low 1A or 1A? I know a singularity or oneness alone cannot make you outerverse, but if it literally stated the more you getting closer to it the more superior you are, isnt that indicate transcendence and not only just lack of differentiation
    Ultima_Reality
    Fixxed
    Fixxed
    "Four becomes three, three becomes two, two becomes one. The closer to singularity we are, the stronger we become. This is the order of grauvenoah, the individual world in which we live."

    Just that and no anti feats

    Hello, is this true? Should the Dark Tower universe be overhauled?
    Ultima_Reality
    Ultima_Reality
    I mean, yeah, the pages are dogshit rn. Gonna check out that thread later.
    Hello ultima. There are some rumours going around so I wanted to ask about these.

    let's imagine characters X and Y.
    character X is 10 layers into outerversal. character Y is viewed as a True God and has absolute control over the reality of character X also views character X and its reality a fiction.
    the reality character Y resides in is also considered a higher plane of existence way above the reality of X.

    but character Y has anti feats of it becoming Tier 0 so cannot be a true monad.
    where would this character Y scale? +1 layer above X or High 1-A(gaining a whole new level of qualitative superiority and algorithm of definition)
    Hi, I wanted to ask: if a cosmology with 2 time axes qualifies as low 1-C, does adding more time axes upgrade the cosmology in the same way additional spatial dimensions do? For instance, would each new time axis add an unquantifiable level of infinity, meaning that 3 time axes would place it 2 unquantifiable infinities above the baseline? Or do all time axes count as the same level of dimensionality?
    BestMGQScalerEver
    BestMGQScalerEver
    its talking about why the dangai has a faster flow of time than the other realms btw. completely independent of higher dimensionality or whatever
    Bastolan27
    Bastolan27
    Thanks, I made some changes based on the whole parallel temporal dimensions you pointed out.
    Bastolan27
    Bastolan27
    @BestMGQScalerEver The time axes are clearly stated and shown to exist. While the Dangai itself doesn’t qualify for higher dimensionality due to what Ultima said, a temporal dimension that encompasses it and it's time axes might. So, I’m waiting for his response. Ishinn also states on a different page and panel, separate from the 2000x density, that the Dangai has at least one more time axis, so the 2000x density doesn’t even need to be used.
    Hello, Ultima
    I was wondering about this part of the FAQ:
    Furthermore, since the "lack of continuity" that exists between the higher level and the lower one is structural, and not causal, there can potentially be more unorthodox ways of bypassing the 1-A barrier. For example: Things that don't have anything to do with raw power, but just a general transfer/exposure of information between one level and another. Another example could be cosmologies where a higher level originates from the thoughts/beliefs/etc of inhabitants of a lower level; while these thoughts literally originating within the lower reality and then somehow "floating away" to form a higher one would be a disqualifier, no anti-feat is present if the verse has it so these operations simply already exist in a higher reality.
    So that would mean Info type 2 hax is dependent on reality levels, right?

    Would that also mean Regen [info type 2] is limited to one's reality level; and if the reality level as a whole is destroyed, that character would be incapacitated beyond the point of regeneration?

    Additionally, if there's some fundamental aspect of a character that's lacks spatio-temporal features and is independent of reality levels, would that give a character HGR for regenerating from the destruction of that aspect? And if yes, which general aspect from the HGR page would fit it? [i.e., "narrative", "concept", etc]
    Hello! Would you be willing to check out this CRT? Many thanks in advance.
    Hi there, I also have a question in regards to Nonduality:

    If said Yin-Yang duality comprised the verse down to the conceptual levels (including making up all matter, spaces, and phenomena within them)

    Would this Entity gain resistances/immunity to everything in any reality equal to or lesser than the scale of the Entity’s original verse? For instance:

    Character A is nondual to the concepts of “0” and “1” which are the fundamental units that metaphysically define the verse on all levels, and character B is from a different verse and yet is equal in scale/dimensionality to the verse of character A. Does character A gain all immunity to Bs attacks?
    Is it fine if I make a seperate thread discussing antifeats that put 1-A into the question, let alone 0?The main thread should be locked until these issues are resolved, as theres quite a few
    2 big examples being the root being a “periphery” of the nasuverse, and angra making a pathway to it connected by spatial axes

    (sent this on discord, but no reply)
    is nonduality and nep valid in this case? or will they get the castlevania treatment?

    Hello, quick question:
    On the Omnipotence page, one of the applications for it, namely Supraessential Existence, links to Nonexistent Physiology. In this case, what kind of natures and aspects of Nonexistent Physiology does Supraessential Existence give?
    hi ultima,one 1-A thread already got 3 admin approvals(including yours) few days ago. maybe we can wrap it up then?

    Hey ultima ,i have a question ,
    a verse has a principle that defines time and space as a whole but this principle as a whole is also defined by a higher principle ,like some form of meta principle that also happens to be independent and the source of the lesser principle .
    Is the meta higher principle low 1A?
    Hello, Ultima, I have a rather simple question.

    We know that 2-C or 2-B > Low 2-C[timeline/universe], inasmuch as that 2-C or 2-B are basically multiple amount of Low 2-C constructs.
    However, the same doesn't apply to 2-A, insofar as that "multiple sets of infinite universes" are still 2-A [according to the FAQ] because countable infinity x countable infinity still results in, well, countable infinity.

    However, which one of this methods apply to Low 1-C?
    If we take Low 1-C as a Hyper-timeline, then multiple of said Hypertimelines should still be bigger in size then a single Hyper-timeline, the same way a normal set of more than one 4D timelines is bigger in size then a single 4D timeline, right?
    Or are we gonna assume the 2-A mechanic here and say that multiple Low 1-C constructs [where each construct is X-size] are still equivalent to a single Low 1-C construct [of X-size], even if each of the Low 1-C constructs is causally[as a space-time] isolated from each other?
    Hello, Ultima,
    I had some questions regarding Nonduality (current definitions), and was hoping you could answer them:

    If a verse revolves around the duality of Yin Yang or Light and Darkness (on a Conceptual level), where said "Yin" and "Yang" are treated as qualities or fundamental truths governing all existence (not a single universe/space-time continuity), could they be treated as the General Duality with just that much context? (Inasmuch as that something Nondual to them would attain Nonduality type 2)

    And what if, under the same premise as the first question, the verse also contextualizes that said Yin and Yang give birth to many other yin-yang type connections (some of which are also conceptual, yet still overall a "part" of that "bigger" Duality of Yin-yang), would that be enough to be treated as the General Duality if the context of the first question is not enough?

    Note: The verse has introduced many stuff from Buddhism, as well as Chinese stuff in general (though its a japanese novel).
    Hey Ultima. Do you mind if I make an input to this root upgrade thread? I've been too busy recently. But I'm free enough now. Also gotta clear up some mistranslations used in the thread too
    Hi Ultima, you already agreed for 1-A for this thread, but there is 1 smaller argument written as a reply to you there that requires your opinion to reach the definite tieiring(for the argument proposes the idea of scaling higher than baseline 1-A). If you can spare some time to quickly adress it, the whole thread will be finalized rather soon.

    The thread i am talking about:

    If you see this, write something or I'll get upset.
    Hi Ultima, can you evaluate this thread?
    Can we get this evaluated? It has been pretty long so
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top