• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Ultima_Reality
Reaction score
16,238

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Hey ultima ,i have a question ,
    a verse has a principle that defines time and space as a whole but this principle as a whole is also defined by a higher principle ,like some form of meta principle that also happens to be independent and the source of the lesser principle .
    Is the meta higher principle low 1A?
    Hello, Ultima, I have a rather simple question.

    We know that 2-C or 2-B > Low 2-C[timeline/universe], inasmuch as that 2-C or 2-B are basically multiple amount of Low 2-C constructs.
    However, the same doesn't apply to 2-A, insofar as that "multiple sets of infinite universes" are still 2-A [according to the FAQ] because countable infinity x countable infinity still results in, well, countable infinity.

    However, which one of this methods apply to Low 1-C?
    If we take Low 1-C as a Hyper-timeline, then multiple of said Hypertimelines should still be bigger in size then a single Hyper-timeline, the same way a normal set of more than one 4D timelines is bigger in size then a single 4D timeline, right?
    Or are we gonna assume the 2-A mechanic here and say that multiple Low 1-C constructs [where each construct is X-size] are still equivalent to a single Low 1-C construct [of X-size], even if each of the Low 1-C constructs is causally[as a space-time] isolated from each other?
    Hello, Ultima,
    I had some questions regarding Nonduality (current definitions), and was hoping you could answer them:

    If a verse revolves around the duality of Yin Yang or Light and Darkness (on a Conceptual level), where said "Yin" and "Yang" are treated as qualities or fundamental truths governing all existence (not a single universe/space-time continuity), could they be treated as the General Duality with just that much context? (Inasmuch as that something Nondual to them would attain Nonduality type 2)

    And what if, under the same premise as the first question, the verse also contextualizes that said Yin and Yang give birth to many other yin-yang type connections (some of which are also conceptual, yet still overall a "part" of that "bigger" Duality of Yin-yang), would that be enough to be treated as the General Duality if the context of the first question is not enough?

    Note: The verse has introduced many stuff from Buddhism, as well as Chinese stuff in general (though its a japanese novel).
    Hey Ultima. Do you mind if I make an input to this root upgrade thread? I've been too busy recently. But I'm free enough now. Also gotta clear up some mistranslations used in the thread too
    Hi Ultima, you already agreed for 1-A for this thread, but there is 1 smaller argument written as a reply to you there that requires your opinion to reach the definite tieiring(for the argument proposes the idea of scaling higher than baseline 1-A). If you can spare some time to quickly adress it, the whole thread will be finalized rather soon.

    The thread i am talking about:

    If you see this, write something or I'll get upset.
    Hi Ultima, can you evaluate this thread?
    Can we get this evaluated? It has been pretty long so

    Hello, i would appreciate it if you evaluate this thread. Thank you in advance
    Hello Ultima I have a question regarding duality and binary oppositions.

    would a verse what works on the concept of Boolean Algebra aka logic gates have a form of dual systems and or duality. so, for example if the number 0 is (false) then the number 1 is (true). the explanation to this reminded me of how Idealistic Nonexistence is phrases on the fandom page.

    if it does can you please explain why or why not?
    hey ultima i need sum votes here

    Hi!

    If you could check out this thread whenever you get the chance, I would greatly appreciate it.

    Best,

    Eseseso
    Eseseso
    Please comment on this thread.
    Eseseso
    Eseseso
    Le bump
    Yeah I've been away from the wiki for a while due to some IRL matters. I'm free this week, so, will make sure to check it out.
    Any plans on returning here?
    🙏
    Hey Ultima sorry to bother you, I have this 1-A thread that nobody has checked and needs evaluation.. I highly appreciate if you appeared there.

    Ultima_Reality
    Ultima_Reality
    Yeah I've been away from the wiki for a while due to some IRL matters. I'm free this week, so, will make sure to check it out.
    WanderingGecko
    WanderingGecko
    I hope you finish your IRL matters smoothly 🙏
    WanderingGecko
    Hey Ultima, I have a Q and A thread, I believe you're one of the few people that have expertise on hypothetical physics related questions. If you can drop an answer it'll be much appreciated, thank you.

    Hi Ultima. Sorry to bother you. I wanted to know if a void of nothingness (which would be a non-composite realm) can reside in a realm that has time?
    Ultima, I had a question if a timeline is splitting a every instance of time(aleph1 times) and those created timelines continue the process, would it get to H1B? As it's basically R^aleph0, hope u answer, thanks
    Ultima ily check my question my heart ❤️

    Ar1216789
    Ar1216789
    im getting angry 👿
    Ar1216789
    Ar1216789
    ultima fr i ain't playing in need ur opinion
    Can you reply this question?
    Hi could I please get your input here please? I just need one more mod to give an okay.

    It's a blog to help make a confusing series much easier to follow

    Some input here
    Please answer my question

    I would be glad if you could help me here.
    Hello Ultima
    What would this space qualify for, and those who "transcend" to the space?
    It's a space of 4 dimensions where you can now see the 3D world
    It exists outside reality, causality, order, and fate
    Described as a higher plane
    The laws of time and space are different from the regular world. There, everything can be a moment or a lifetime
    I'm not knowledgeable on higher tier stuffs so I don't even know what to propose

    Hurry with your take.
    Hello, Ultima
    I was wandering in my random "what-if" thoughts and suddenly some things got me curious.
    Can someone come back from being reduced to a Tier 0? In any way whatsoever?

    Additionally, if an entity exists purely as thoughts, and holds to the preposition "I think, therefore I am", with that is the only thing or quality that's differentiating the "I" from a Tier 0, and letting the "I" have distinctions, would something that reduces the "I" so much so that it changes into the preposition "I cannot think, therefore I am not", would that reduce the "I" to a Tier 0, or would it just make it go purely "Nothing"[in the truest sense as you describe here]?
    • Like
    Reactions: Huesito88
    Ultima_Reality
    Ultima_Reality
    Another question, if in a verse everything goes according to how a 1-A or higher tier God character wants it to go, then can we ignore potential anti-feats like "character X gaining 1-A powers" via the analogy that it was the God character that made it happen/willed it to happen? "Willed it" in the sense that he created a sort of a "Fate" or "Destiny" that every character in the verse follows unconditionally, and even characters gaining new powers[any] is because they were "fated to gain those powers".

    Probably fine but I'd need to see the specific case to be sure.
    Astral_Trinity439
    Astral_Trinity439
    Astral_Trinity439
    STAFF! HELP ME DOWNGRADE VOID SHIKI, AND MY LIFE IS YOURS!
    (Also you said you would check it 3 weeks ago)
    Hey there Ultima. I have a question regarding ontological transcendence. So, to ontologically transcend something (Low 1-A to 1-A, 1-A to High 1-A), one must work in a different, ontologically superior framework right? So my question is this :

    If character B "transcend" character A who is 1-A, with the context behind "transcend" here is proved to be :
    1. Exist in a different framework
    2. Superior to character A's framework

    That would make character B High 1-A, right?

    If yes, wouldn't that mean the act of "transcend" here be the same as ontological transcendence?
    Livinaa
    Livinaa
    Non 1-A=Quantitative framework=Dimensional/mathematics scaling

    1-A=Qualitative framework=R>F

    High 1-A=Meta-qualitative framework=...
    Grabbing_dragon
    Grabbing_dragon
    Good and one more thing, A framework encompasses all possible extensions of layers with whatever quality is in them.
    Livinaa
    Livinaa
    Bump
    Visit my Yin Tian Shen Yin CRT please.
    Grabbing_dragon
    Grabbing_dragon
    Welcome to eternal suffering because your thread is high 1A ,the only open part is 1A stuff while the high 1A is still onwait
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top