• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Mr. Bambu
Reaction score
29,794

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • I have many responsibilities on this site, and this means I only wear each hat for as long as is necessary. Therefore, you may leave CRT/calc eval/whatever requests, and I will try to get to it, but understand that my time is limited and I'm normally already tapped for some wiki policy matter or maintaining the wiki management threads or handling account issues for users who never seem to get things right. Low priority requests include tiershit, particularly active verses, and discussions with a lot of active staff voices already present. I'm not saying "no" but I probably won't get to them. If I don't reply, smart money says it won't be me to get to it. Sorry.
    Hi, i heard you like downgrade threads

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    hate 'em, can't ******' stand 'em
    Can you evaluate this CRT please? Don't want the pages to flood up and it's a very important one for Bleach's hax

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Bleach is embargo'd. I don't touch the verse at all. Sorry.
    Saqphire
    Saqphire
    It's fine, thanks for commenting anyway
    Hey, hope I'm not bothering you, I sent another message on the post asking you to review my calc again but I guess it didn't send a notification, hope you catch this in a moment you're available.
    Redite250
    Redite250
    That's good then! I've applied the changes you suggested.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Alright, after ages of darkness, you're good to go. Sorry for the long wait, sincerely meant to get back to it.
    Redite250
    Redite250
    Hell yeah. Thanks !
    Hello, this may be out of the blue, but I heard in this link that you interpreted the 3km radius mentioned in canto 7 as the size of the fog, not the size of La Manchaland. Could you explain why?

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I don't know what those words mean. I may have, I may not have; I am not a Project Moon person and I have worked on evaluation matters for hundreds of verses.
    Staff input needed for CRT that is a barren wasteland for over a week. Supporters and other members have unanimously agreed, so just need the staff left.

    TLDR: We're giving new tiers to the Saber Riders, which is derived from a new calc that is used. From that, a scaling page has been created, and Saber has a High 1-A form (which is already accepted due to being part of the cosmology).

    As mentioned above, there is no disagreement among the supporters, so we only need the staff to swing by and evaluate it. If you are unable to evaluate it for whatever reason, could you at least just ping some staff our way so that it doesn't becomg a month old (or god forbid a year old) dusty ass crt that desperately needs evaluation.

    Would heavily appreciate it.
    Shadowslash125
    Shadowslash125
    I tried, but no responses. Atp I'm just hopping from one staff wall to another. Would be best to maybe ping them, since they respond fairly quickly when pinged for some reason. Though regardless, I really appreciate the response instead of the cold shoulder (unintentionally or otherwise) 90% of the staff do while they gloss over my crts.
    (Also not to be an inconsiderate idiot or anything, but this tiershit shenanigans is news to me)
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    It's not so much shenanigans, it's just ideology. I've disliked our tiershit standards since forever. I dislike their current iteration more than others, but none of them have been good, and the fact that so many interpretations of them sort of just prove my point: it's all arbitrary.

    I doubt that any tiershit liker will respond to my ping, but I will agree to ping a handful of them for you. I do know Ultima will not, as to my knowledge, the father of our tiershit system is taking a step back from managing it. Nevertheless, I will dutifully address him.
    Shadowslash125
    Shadowslash125
    Tiershit as in for the high tiers like tier 1 and stuff?
    Wait, there might not be a need for that. We've already had it accepted via a previous crt about the cosmology. We are just stating that High 1-A Saber will be applied via the cosmology itself, so I figure there's not much to evaluate on that end. It's mostly the new scaling and new low tier tiers.

    Regardless, thank you.
    Excuse me. Please evaluate my thread below. The summary for this thread: I basically propose a downgrade for High 1-B Blue Archive for many issues.

    In short, the downgrade shows that the setting’s multidimensionality never qualifies as true Higher Dimensions: it isn’t infinitely above lower layers, its scope is limited, and the narrative frames it as parallel universes that haven’t even fully materialized. The Ark of Atrahasis’ barrier does not contain any High 1-B structure; it merely uses machinery that taps only partially into external Infinite Dimensions, and its destruction fails to affect even a full planet. The False Sanctums’ energy also cannot be High 1-B, as it is limited, numerically calculable, and even projected to be destroyed within two weeks. Consequently, the feats of Aris, the Ark, and Utnapishtim’s Ship align far more with Quantum and Dimensional Manipulation, and under superposition fit neatly into NEP Nature 3 rather than High 1-B. Altogether, both the AP and cosmology ratings for High 1-B fall apart due to overwhelming internal inconsistencies.

    Thank you in advance.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I appreciate the above-average effort made to explain this on my wall- genuinely, that's very helpful.

    That said, I really don't think it will be me evaluating this. I dislike evaluating Tiershit, I find that it becomes very arbitrary and unpleasant when disagreements over these arbitrary points arises.

    I do wish you luck, however.
    Can you check this crt for peter?

    Pretty simple madness CRT. just applying a calc that was accepted. Mind taking a peek?

    Unable to comment on the thread cause of the ban (not appealing though for unban), I just wanted to send this to you and DaMonkeMan:

    We could also mention that discussion of fiction and media also does allow for deeper understanding/analysis of stuff in general cause there may be differing and similar views on various aspects of fiction and media and it's usually worth discussing such views unless there are views that are generally seen as harmful and therefore unacceptable or otherwise invalid and unreliable/inaccurate and imprecise.

    But it also is sorta case-by-case basis as to the matter of spending time with others or by oneself cause different people generally have different specific needs, wants, etc for different stuff (even if we all do have the same general common needs and wants in quite a few ways, they "manifest"/present in different forms and levels).
    Hi, can you come and evaluate these CRTs?
    (the above one is straightforward and kinda self-evident)

    Hello sir, I'd appreciate it if you could give your input on this CRT, it is required to create a fairly big verse with several tier 1 characters. The CRT should be mostly done by now if not completely done as this is the leftover from a dead CRT months ago. Thank you.

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I don't like to work on Tiershit, so I'm not guaranteeing my commitment; I will try to get to this.

    That said.

    Please don't call me sir. It makes me uncomfortable. It's a formal term for me. I'm just some guy, yeah?
    Acertainbcplayer
    Acertainbcplayer
    Alright, thanks for the help man
    You mind keeping this open for 1 more day. The Omni-man side has some argumnets they would like to make:
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    It isn't locked, so I guess just let me know if it gets locked? I'll extend permission for a day's extension, no big deal.
    Hello sir, can you please check this out? We really need your evaluations 🙏
    Hello, would be appreciated if you could give an evaluation for this CRT. It's been over 2 months for such a minor CRT and I only need 1 more approval, Viet has tried pinging other staff to but to no avail lol.
    Good afternoon, excuse me, I would like to ask how to calculate the creation of a continent as large as Australia. Should I use explosion formulas?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    It is worth mentioning that creation feats must prove a short timeframe, legitimate creation, and a UES (universal energy system, something like magic) to be used as an attack potency feat. It must be proven that it scales to their AP- this is not our default assumption.

    Because these feats have no bearing on real world physics, we have offered a table of community consensus that denotes what sizes (and specifically, what masses) are necessary to breach into each tier (below 5-C). Your calc, then, would involve finding the kg mass of the created continent, and associating that with this table to find the appropriate tier.
    You seem to be the only knowledgeable member of dwarf fortress I can find (hard since no verse page)

    Currently the Adventurer has a feat of seeing crossbow bolts frozen mid-air. I was hoping if you were able to provide a scan of it or know someone who can as there isn't one on the profile and would help out with this calc I've done
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I have no idea what that refers to as I disliked Adventure mode.

    If I had to guess, it's a misrepresentation. It's turn based, and ammunition might not reach its target before a turn ends. So in the frozen "turn", you might see ammo "floating" in mid-air. Because time isn't moving actively.
    Hi, Bambu
    Could you please evaluate this? 🙏

    Most of the abilities are already accepted on their respective profiles and there are only 3 new abilities, namely the ones described in summary.

    Thanks!
    Yo Mr. Bambu, could you take a look at this thread and give your opinion:
    Hey. Was there ever a time on the wiki where Content Mods were capable of approving CRTs?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Not to my recollection, no. But back in the day, the wiki was a wild and unstructured place; it has been almost ten years since then, so my memory may admittedly be out of sync.
    Hello Mr. Bambu,

    I’m currently really short-staffed, and since the thread is just a straightforward ability addition, could you please take a look at it ?

    I’d also appreciate it if you could give your vote on whether you agree or disagree.
    Hello, you participated in the discussion about match deletion and rule violations and decided to wait to hear what I have to say.
    Could you please review this?

    Mind giving some input on this thread? appreciated.
    Please @Mr. Bambu

    Give your opinion on the NEP 2 since you are knowledgeable about it. 😭

    Nobody is answering, we need you to close this thread for good.

    Dooyo
    Dooyo
    Why? 😭
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    because I hate buzzword abilities with a burning passion and I have the blessed excuse of there being a shitload of other things I can devote my time to instead.

    godspeed, brother 🙏
    Dooyo
    Dooyo
    If you do me that one last favor brother, I will be grateful, please, one time and no more. 😭
    Could you take a look at this small CRT?
    You lack the necessary abilities to disprove incredulity and lack of belief in the results. In this instance, it is a place where the mere mention of a fallacy does not and cannot dismiss the sentiment behind it. I do not believe the results because we live in a world where they are obviously false- and we operate on a wiki in which we bastardize the concepts of the real world in order to approximate realistic outcomes. If you approach me with some slice of the real world, get X and Y results leagues over what is realistic, and say "any argument saying this is unrealistic is argument from incredulity", that reads like avoiding the issue.
    You cannot be serious lol, this is embarrassing on your end, justifying your falacious take with a falacious take and then shutting the thread down is improper use of your power. You say I do not have the necessary abilities to disprove incredulity is blatantly acting like you're better than me.

    I suggest you tone it down, you're not some god, don't act all high and mighty.

    I will say, you lack the abilities to debunk the calculation because your mathematical ability is lackluster, see how it feels? Just don't be a douche dude.
    Robo432343
    Robo432343
    dude he's just doing his job you're the one being a douche
    Vzearr
    Vzearr
    Lol, you're funny, if doing his job is shutting down threads based on incredulity, then you're in the wrong here.

    How am I being a douche, he's the one who's being condescending.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top