• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Mr. Bambu
Reaction score
29,524

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • I have many responsibilities on this site, and this means I only wear each hat for as long as is necessary. Therefore, you may leave CRT/calc eval/whatever requests, and I will try to get to it, but understand that my time is limited and I'm normally already tapped for some wiki policy matter or maintaining the wiki management threads or handling account issues for users who never seem to get things right. Low priority requests include tiershit, particularly active verses, and discussions with a lot of active staff voices already present. I'm not saying "no" but I probably won't get to them. If I don't reply, smart money says it won't be me to get to it. Sorry.
    Hello!
    Could we create a new crt instead of this one?

    Reasons:
    This thread has reached seven pages, and almost all of it is unrelated to the main topic, mostly just arguments.Therefore, I hope you’ll allow us to start a new thread instead of this one.
    Thank you.
    Hello, I was just wondering what I should do regarding my thread, it was closed and I obviously can't add anymore to it but I don't think it was properly refuted at all, do I just make another one with more undeniable evidence?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    There is a cooldown to rejected threads before the topic can be broached again. I suppose until that cooldown passes, you can work on gathering evidence, though it is worth noting that just because you interpret things in such a way does not mean others will as well. The cooldown for revisiting a rejected topic is 3 months.
    Avaritia_603
    Avaritia_603
    Well yes I agree but I didn't even see a single refutation to my last point on the original thread post, and it arguably being the most important one
    Hi. Can help evaluate this crt, this crt needed one more staff vote, please 🙏
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    person below you requested that I look at Honkai and if I do both I think I'll probably go insane, probably ask someone else.
    I wont attempt at guilt tripping like the guy below me fr.

    can you check out this crt please 🙏

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    anointed, although I hate this verse. I shall consider it.
    I last asked you to evaluate one of my calculations almost four months ago, and you didn't.

    Can you evaluate this one?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    you tempt me to say no even harder just for the attempt at guilt tripping me for not doing the last request. I was in the hospital four months ago lol.
    CodeCCLL
    CodeCCLL
    Given that this could also be used for the ability to split a star in half, and considering it could affect a many high tiered verses, it would be good to get one more confirmation before make a thread. So... Bump.
    TV Invincible CRT
    It's kinda packed tho but in the state the verse is in it's required, please check it

    @Antvasima said he'd like to wait for your vote. Would you be interested and kindly provide your evaluation?

    Summaries from all sides have been provided in the linked post. 🙏
    Been waiting for several months for this to get pushed. Can I just have one vote?
    Arkansalter2
    Arkansalter2
    Sad-Computer.webp
    EmbalmerMaster9000
    EmbalmerMaster9000
    give Arkan his vote back Bambu (
    3zok5c.png
    ).......

    wolf-snarl.gif
    Arkansalter2
    Arkansalter2
    (nobody ever voted)
    Why would you lock it and just not give permission to post it, anyways, you implied that it would be okay to post it.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I am not the only guy in the discussion. The discussion did not reach a conclusion. As much as I would like to have the singular, unilateral vote in all things, this is not so. Ant's opinion was hazy on whether doing anything publicly (which I note you're now asking about it, publicly, again) would be a good idea, and only three votes were passed down out of the eleven present staff. I don't expect all of them to speak, but latching onto my positive vote alone doesn't really work, we need a conclusion first.
    Vzearr
    Vzearr
    Fair
    Yosh, Bambu sir. Is it alright if you could answer this question proposed below?

    If you get the time could you look at this?

    Whenever you have the chance, could you check out this thread?
    Hi, I'm sorry to call you back, but something important has been said in the thread regarding what is being talked about. I really just need you to look at this because you were asking about the scope of "worlds", and I don't want to just have a disagree tacked on for something I don't even think you necessarily disagree with.
    Hello, Mr. Bambu
    You may be familiar with this thread
    May I ask you to give posting permission to people the OP mentions at the start of the thread (knowledgeable supporters)?
    Since I'm pretty sure the OP cannot announce it himself
    Have a good day
    hello there!

    recently me and another user were debating on whether to use pixel scaling or population size to determine how large a city is.

    out of these two methods, which one would you say is the best?

    for extra context regarding the situation, the OP post as well as posts #57 through to #71 have other information on each of our viewpoints:
    https://vsbattles.com/threads/hellaverse-might-of-lilith-overload-calcs.185627/
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Case-by-case. Some verses just don't really have reliable visuals for things like that. Video games lack the rendering capacity, cartoons simplify everything, etc. Pixel scaling is the ideal, but there are likely scenarios where it becomes unfeasible.
    Hi, i heard you like downgrade threads

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    hate 'em, can't ******' stand 'em
    Can you evaluate this CRT please? Don't want the pages to flood up and it's a very important one for Bleach's hax

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Bleach is embargo'd. I don't touch the verse at all. Sorry.
    Saqphire
    Saqphire
    It's fine, thanks for commenting anyway
    Hey, hope I'm not bothering you, I sent another message on the post asking you to review my calc again but I guess it didn't send a notification, hope you catch this in a moment you're available.
    Redite250
    Redite250
    That's good then! I've applied the changes you suggested.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Alright, after ages of darkness, you're good to go. Sorry for the long wait, sincerely meant to get back to it.
    Redite250
    Redite250
    Hell yeah. Thanks !
    Hello, this may be out of the blue, but I heard in this link that you interpreted the 3km radius mentioned in canto 7 as the size of the fog, not the size of La Manchaland. Could you explain why?

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I don't know what those words mean. I may have, I may not have; I am not a Project Moon person and I have worked on evaluation matters for hundreds of verses.
    Staff input needed for CRT that is a barren wasteland for over a week. Supporters and other members have unanimously agreed, so just need the staff left.

    TLDR: We're giving new tiers to the Saber Riders, which is derived from a new calc that is used. From that, a scaling page has been created, and Saber has a High 1-A form (which is already accepted due to being part of the cosmology).

    As mentioned above, there is no disagreement among the supporters, so we only need the staff to swing by and evaluate it. If you are unable to evaluate it for whatever reason, could you at least just ping some staff our way so that it doesn't becomg a month old (or god forbid a year old) dusty ass crt that desperately needs evaluation.

    Would heavily appreciate it.
    Shadowslash125
    Shadowslash125
    I tried, but no responses. Atp I'm just hopping from one staff wall to another. Would be best to maybe ping them, since they respond fairly quickly when pinged for some reason. Though regardless, I really appreciate the response instead of the cold shoulder (unintentionally or otherwise) 90% of the staff do while they gloss over my crts.
    (Also not to be an inconsiderate idiot or anything, but this tiershit shenanigans is news to me)
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    It's not so much shenanigans, it's just ideology. I've disliked our tiershit standards since forever. I dislike their current iteration more than others, but none of them have been good, and the fact that so many interpretations of them sort of just prove my point: it's all arbitrary.

    I doubt that any tiershit liker will respond to my ping, but I will agree to ping a handful of them for you. I do know Ultima will not, as to my knowledge, the father of our tiershit system is taking a step back from managing it. Nevertheless, I will dutifully address him.
    Shadowslash125
    Shadowslash125
    Tiershit as in for the high tiers like tier 1 and stuff?
    Wait, there might not be a need for that. We've already had it accepted via a previous crt about the cosmology. We are just stating that High 1-A Saber will be applied via the cosmology itself, so I figure there's not much to evaluate on that end. It's mostly the new scaling and new low tier tiers.

    Regardless, thank you.
    Excuse me. Please evaluate my thread below. The summary for this thread: I basically propose a downgrade for High 1-B Blue Archive for many issues.

    In short, the downgrade shows that the setting’s multidimensionality never qualifies as true Higher Dimensions: it isn’t infinitely above lower layers, its scope is limited, and the narrative frames it as parallel universes that haven’t even fully materialized. The Ark of Atrahasis’ barrier does not contain any High 1-B structure; it merely uses machinery that taps only partially into external Infinite Dimensions, and its destruction fails to affect even a full planet. The False Sanctums’ energy also cannot be High 1-B, as it is limited, numerically calculable, and even projected to be destroyed within two weeks. Consequently, the feats of Aris, the Ark, and Utnapishtim’s Ship align far more with Quantum and Dimensional Manipulation, and under superposition fit neatly into NEP Nature 3 rather than High 1-B. Altogether, both the AP and cosmology ratings for High 1-B fall apart due to overwhelming internal inconsistencies.

    Thank you in advance.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I appreciate the above-average effort made to explain this on my wall- genuinely, that's very helpful.

    That said, I really don't think it will be me evaluating this. I dislike evaluating Tiershit, I find that it becomes very arbitrary and unpleasant when disagreements over these arbitrary points arises.

    I do wish you luck, however.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top