• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Mr. Bambu
Reaction score
22,313

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Silence after one message means I missed it; silence after two means "no".
    Hey Bambu! Hope youre doing well! I originally sent this to Qawsed but figured you'd be the guy to ask about this. Apologies in advance for the length of the question:

    For context, I've been recently getting into DnD and for the most part understand the cosmology in full up until the Luminous Being. I've seen the justification for the High 1-A tier and I think it's pretty straight forward, but I was wondering if there were any additional scans or statements to support the idea that no matter how many layers there are above the Far realm, the LM will always be inaccessibly more powerful in relation to the setting? The explanations make sense, but I was just curious about more scans to support it if possible. Thanks in advance!
    Abeastiry
    Sorry, I think the way I worded my question implied I was asking for statements about the LB's superiority/inaccessible nature. I was mostly asking if there are any scans or statements showing that there exist or can exist an infinite number of layers above the Far realm, since that is mentioned is mentioned on the LB page but I can't find anything talking about infinite layers above that realm, only that the uvuudaum transcend father llymic or something to that effect. If that's what you were responding to, then apologies if that's the case.
    Abeastiry
    Bump. Sorry if you're busy. Just rephrased my question so hopefully it makes more sense and is clear now.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Oh, I didn't even see your reply.

    My original statement applies, there's not many scans or statements about The Luminous Being at all. Just that they do exist, they're above the setting, and serve as a tie-in for the DM. As it is shown that there are layers with the Far Realm (with Uvuudaum serving as the Lord of the place), it logically follows that no matter how many layers you add, you cannot surpass the person running the game. This is the basis of the tier, approved back in the day by Ultima and Aeyu.
    Renitr
    Renitr
    Jason_Courne fixed calc. Check it pls
    Renitr
    Renitr
    You result 11.35 m/s should work?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I think even that is probably a scuffed ass result, due to the nuance of accounting for Norman Reedus' arm length and the general inconsistency of using angsizing for such incredibly close quarters, but at least the math is right about it, yeah.
    If you have some time, could you comment on this?
    Can i ask something about abstract existence type 2 and immortality type 8? If you dont mind obviously
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I think you and any other user are free to create threads at your leisure. If the thing works like you say it works, your debunking really only involves proving that and pointing out, as best as you can manage, that this isn't really what Abstract Existence Type 2 is.
    God243
    God243
    If i make a thread you will give your opinion there? Anyway of even they are reliant on a thought this Is not abstract existence type 2?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I don't make any promises, no. But I might.
    Hello. Can you give your opinion on these two moments pls
    First:
    Daryl doesn't dodge the bullet. The bullet hits another place. But Daryl, after sound of shot, manages to bend down a little before the bullet hits the wall. (That is, he manages to make a little head down move before the bullet hits another place. Better watch in 0,25 speed)
    Could this be a speed feat?
    Starts 0:06


    Second:
    Rosita tracking a crossbow bolt with her eyes. (Better watch frame by frame)
    Could this be a speed feat?
    Starts 0:11
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Can you show me the proof that he moved before the bullet reached its position, because this is now the third angle I've heard on this feat and I'm honestly befuddled how you're proving this. He moves while the dust from the impact is moving, but what of the bullet, as that is the object with hundreds of meters per second speed. Where is the bullet.

    The second feat: we could actually, yes, calculate the speed of her turning her head like that. She turns 90 degrees in 4 frames on 25 fps, that is 0.16 seconds. If someone wanted to try to get a speed out of that, it could be done, but the crossbow is something she's already looking at beforehand (and thus has time to register it firing).
    Renitr
    Renitr
    Ok. Thanks
    could you please evevaluate this for me? Thank you.
    Please allow me to comment on this.
    Hi mister, I have a simple question, Do you have a comunity on the WhatsApp platform? I'v just ask
    Sepe_ferdinan
    Sepe_ferdinan
    but I have a little proof, he said he had beat vsb 2×, do you know community abc? he carries vsb as protection Here, Here, on comunity whattsap, I translated a little because they are Indonesian
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I'm not familiar with any community called "abc", no.

    I've heard of the guy posing as me associated with some of those users, though. Most certainly not me- I'd never have an anime profile picture, they're doing a poor job imitating me. Thanks for bringing this up.
    Sepe_ferdinan
    Sepe_ferdinan
    what will you do? their accounts are still on vsb, especially williamxjoe and others
    Hello Mr. Bambu, I have a question.

    Imagine a character having a knife with the capacity of traveling to the past when thrown (not by sheer speed, but simply because the weapon has that ability) to kill the target's past self. Is it warranted to give an "immeasurable" thanks to the knife for this character ? Wouldn't it be more logical for it to merely be a hax ?
    hi, can u give u input here?
    Could you please comment on this thread?
    Hello, could you please evevaluate this for me? Thank you.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    How horrible, will try to get to it.
    NXCHT.66
    NXCHT.66
    Haha I would be very happy if you eventually evaluated my CRT.
    Hello! if you have time, can you please check this out?

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Ionization is a weird method, looking back on it, I dunno if I'd still stand by those calcs. Still, I support the initiative, as I still very much adore XCOM. I seem to recall animations of soldiers dodging projectiles somewhat, although those animations of missed shots have always been very dodgy and odd. I can't think of anything in particular for LS off the top of my head, unfortunately.
    Tomfer
    Tomfer
    I'm using your (old ass) suggestions as a base, hence why I'm still using ionization.

    Speed-wise... Yeah, they don't really look like dodging and more of the opponent's fault for missing them, but still... I guess it can still be used? If nothing else comes. LS-wise, yeah, I guess I'll just put them as Athletic Humans since they're soldiers.

    On another note, I've seen a very old CRT where you offered to put Sectoid's scaling as "possible" because Soldiers, while they can tank it, they do it barely. How about downscaling instead? It sounds more pausible since they can indeed tank it, it's not really open to possibilities.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Meh, I just can't personally remember what led to that conclusion- discussions that I don't think I have a presence in any more, I don't recall any lore that would have made that cool. They're still evaluated, but I think it would be better to just go with destruction/superheating, tbh.

    That last point sounds fine to me. Six years of experience has changed how I view a lot of things, and our standards have also changed significantly since then.
    Hello Mr Bambu. Sorry for bothering, if it's not too much to ask, I ask for your validation, on the topic I showed about the "Lifting Strength", which without offending, I don't know if I approve or not, about the character of Elisabeth (the eminence in shadow), please, it's just that, the rest I have already confirmed that it is not, until further notice. . As I understand it, there is no rule of denial regarding that detail, and up to the current date, information like that had already been partially approved.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    My apologies for the delay, I explained as much in the thread but I had begun typing a response only to become distracted. I forgot to return.
    Hello Mr Bambu. Excuse me for disturbing you I would like to have the opinion of an administrator on crt please
    I need more staff input when you get a chance. Not a long read:
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    everything is a long read with my attention span
    Golden_Void
    Golden_Void
    Real 😭 takes me 6 hours to read 3 chapters these days
    Could you evaluate this CRT please?

    Hi. Can you check this calc please. Just supporting feat.

    This moment on YouTube. Starts 0:19


    Better quality. Starts 42:44
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Every time a gunshot does not connect isn't a feat of dodging the bullet, man. People in Walking Dead just miss a pretty realistic amount of the time.

    I'm tired of the constant nega-feats like this being brought up for evaluation over and over. I don't know how to help you people, or whether you even really want to be helped.
    Hello friend, Could you evaluate this thread really quick please?

    Hello good Mr. Administrator and others, it is a pleasure to meet you and it is the first time I have spoken with you. Let's see if you could take a look and rectify this thread I made, for a modified character profile? I followed the rules and everything, and now it will be 48 hours of waiting and nothing.

    Elisabeth (the eminence in shadow) - Update

    NT: sorry if the link doesn't work out well or if you don't know how to edit it well, I'm just learning from this.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    For future reference, everything being blurred like that is a bit jarring.

    As you can probably see from my wall, I have many ongoing requests for my attention on verses I know very little about. That said, I put a good deal of respect in an individual working on a small verse alone, as that tends to be my path on this wiki as well. As such, I will try to prioritize going through your thread before my other obligations- I still cannot promise haste in this matter, and must ask for patience, but I will go to this before the others.
    Andresx27
    Andresx27
    Thank you very much for everything, forgive me in part, I know how busy you are, but in part it didn't occur to me that someone else, the good "Antvasima", He is already with some hard work, and i followed the advice and other things that the people, told me It happened and it turned out that in the [Knowledgeable Members List (Verses)], I searched and did not find a list of those who are good in the field of the series that I follow, (as it has not yet been created).

    And those who do like the series, like they don't debate or report, with the secondary or third characters. (not yet).

    I will try to improve the references as soon as I gain more experience and continue practicing. Thanks for attending, Don't worry, I'll be waiting, in fact you're the first to give me some context, I'll be waiting and I'll try to edit a little, see if it works out better.
    May I please have your permission to comment on this thread?
    Shadow_x007x
    Shadow_x007x
    Yes, I made a mistake. Sorry about that. I meant to say, could you please give me your feedback on this thread? (My English is not very good.)
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Ah, well, that's another matter. It'll be put on the List of Things. (This means that I'll try, but don't make any promises)
    Shadow_x007x
    Shadow_x007x
    Sorry for bothering. Are you free to comment on this thread now?
    Can you check out this thread on the Calc member thread

    Please read it through when you have the time to do so
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top