- 34,576
- 35,011
Don't post like a troll.So yes, it's time to wrap it up, you failed to debunk anything, now put my fries in the bag.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't post like a troll.So yes, it's time to wrap it up, you failed to debunk anything, now put my fries in the bag.
All are running here, from the koryu initially, and then the kototsu later on, which is high speed.,
Option A :
All Visual pixel scalable shots averaged to be the new basis of all Hueco Mundo Arc Calcs
Option B :
All (valid) visual shots + nel's statement get averaged together to reflect the most accurate end
They never ran for 7 days, the 7 day figure was the time it took Urahara to open the senkaimon to the soul society.All are running here, from the koryu initially, and then the kototsu later on, which is high speed.,
They were there for 7 days straight, and they had to constantly run, due to the koryu, and the kototsu.
- Should we permit calcs to use Nel's statement for LN's size, if the calculation uses visuals scaling off of that?
- Should we permit calcs to use Nel's statement for LN's size, if the calculation uses no visuals for scaling?
- Should the size of LN given by Nel's statement be re-evaluated (likely by making it lower, assuming that a "three days walk" includes breaks)?
- Should we permit calcs to scale LN-related feats purely off of visuals, ignoring Nel's statement?
- Should the size of LN given by purely visual scaling, as provided in the OP, be re-evaluated (OP was 5.4km, I've found visual combinations that go as low as 1.7km, YmTheSuper found an off-site calc of 13km)?
- Should those calculations be revised in other regards (averaging 5m and 3400m to get a "better size estimate" is not a good method)?
Ghostimus has also been saying similar stuff. Both should act better, but it seems unfair to only focus on Hellscream.Don't post like a troll.
Good point, i actually forgot about this, haven't read the entirety of the series in 10+ yearsThey never ran for 7 days, the 7 day figure was the time it took Urahara to open the senkaimon to the soul society.
The idea that they ran for 7 days with the dangai makes no sense when Urahara kept warning them that they have to reach the other side of the Dangai within 4 minutes and that other side was visible from the moment they started running with very clear sense of urgency.
I haven't been reading every single comment; that line just stood out to me, but yes, users should avoid trying to aggravate each other.Ghostimus has also been saying similar stuff. Both should act better, but it seems unfair to only focus on Hellscream.
Dude 16 hours per day of walking is still a little wanked but that's still way better than the BS 235 kmI made a quick calc using 8 hours of sleep/rest per day:
Walking time per day: 24 - 8 = 16 h/day
Total walking time: 6 × 16 = 96 h
In seconds: 96 × 3600 = 345,600 s
Distance/circumference:
345,600 × 1.4 = 483,840 m
483,840 m = 483.84 km
Radius of Las Noches:
r = 483.84 / 2π
r ≈ 483.84 / 6.283185
r ≈ 77.01 km
anyways, ima wait for staff to vote on the options, if you're not staff please don't comment
Maybe it can be touched up but looking a little bit into how much people can cross per day (can't find a good reliable source otherwise I'd just suggest it) that seems roughly okay.I made a quick calc using 8 hours of sleep/rest per day:
Walking time per day: 24 - 8 = 16 h/day
Total walking time: 6 × 16 = 96 h
In seconds: 96 × 3600 = 345,600 s
Distance/Whole circumference:
345,600 × 1.4 = 483,840 m
483,840 m = 483.84 km
Radius of Las Noches:
r = 483.84 / 2π
r ≈ 483.84 / 6.283185
r ≈ 77.01 km
I used this, for average walking speed of 1.4m/s.Maybe it can be touched up but looking a little bit into how much people can cross per day (can't find a good reliable source otherwise I'd just suggest it) that seems roughly okay.
I haven't been keeping up with the thread so I don't know if you've gotten an answer for this, but Orihime currently has Hypersonic combat speed. Bleach doesn't have travel speed ratings (all profile speeds are assumed as combat unless stated otherwise) and while I'm still working on Part 2 of my speed revisions (covering everything up to the Timeskip except Aizen and everyone who scales to him), I don't really have anything for travel speed atm (and quite frankly, I don't really want to bother, someone else can do travel speed revisions if they want).I'm not super familiar with the series' chronology and scaling, but this LN stuff seems to happen well after the Arrancar Arc, where Orihime has Hypersonic travel speed (or maybe the profile's structured badly? idk).
Agree with everything.
- I'd prefer 4, though not as strongly as at the beginning of the thread.
- Same as 1.
- Absolutely, if we end up choosing it as higher priority.
- I think that's better.
- Sure. I'm all for refining the method.
- Duh
I think either option A or B would be fine.dubs
Damage may we have your input?
great, that's 3 votes for option A and 1 for B so farOption A : Armorchompy, M3X, Damage3245
All Visual pixel scalable shots averaged to be the new basis of all Hueco Mundo Arc Calcs
Option B : Damage3245
All (valid) visual shots + nel's statement get averaged together to reflect the most accurate end
Same for me.
- I'd prefer 4, though not as strongly as at the beginning of the thread.
- Same as 1.
- Absolutely, if we end up choosing it as higher priority.
- I think that's better.
- Sure. I'm all for refining the method.
- Duh
With all the initial voters having re-affirmed their stance, I think it's safe to conclude with the majority vote so far that the on screen depiction method has been accepted.Option A : Armorchompy, M3X, Damage3245, Floxy
All Visual pixel scalable shots averaged to be the new basis of all Hueco Mundo Arc Calcs
Option B : Damage3245
All (valid) visual shots + nel's statement get averaged together to reflect the most accurate end
he literally said 4 is the better choiceI think you should ask @Dalesean027 since he disagreed as well, with Agna it could be 3 votes.
@Armorchompy doesn't seems in favour to just toss away the statement, but to include it too.
Just concluding to throw away and ignore the statement still seems to me a forced decision, we have no real reason to fully ignore the stated distance by walking.
Huh? Dalesean hasn't posted here in a while.he literally said 4 is the better choice
![]()
He meant ArmorHuh? Dalesean hasn't posted here in a while.
@Dalesean027I suppose the main practical questions that CGMs should vote on here are:
For which I'd say
- Should we permit calcs to use Nel's statement for LN's size, if the calculation uses visuals scaling off of that?
- Should we permit calcs to use Nel's statement for LN's size, if the calculation uses no visuals for scaling?
- Should the size of LN given by Nel's statement be re-evaluated (likely by making it lower, assuming that a "three days walk" includes breaks)?
- Should we permit calcs to scale LN-related feats purely off of visuals, ignoring Nel's statement?
- Should the size of LN given by purely visual scaling, as provided in the OP, be re-evaluated (OP was 5.4km, I've found visual combinations that go as low as 1.7km, YmTheSuper found an off-site calc of 13km)?
- Should those calculations be revised in other regards (averaging 5m and 3400m to get a "better size estimate" is not a good method)?
If I missed any, lmk and I'll get back to it tomorrow.
- Yes.
- Ideally only if necessary (so, if the manga provides no usable visuals), but if 1 is rejected, then yeah.
- Yes.
- No.
- If 4 is accepted, then yeah.
- Yes.
if you have a height figure for those towers you see in the distance we can find out how far away they are, but if we don't know then all this gives us is height![]()
![]()
In both these images, we see the horizon, can't it be used to be calced as well?
![]()
![]()
In both these images, we see the horizon, can't it be used to be calced as well?
if you have a height figure for those towers you see in the distance we can find out how far away they are, but if we don't know then all this gives us is height
My point here is, if any of the palaces are in the 100-200m range in height, they'd be visible in most of the shots, but they aren't. Would like some proposal through horizon measurements maybe?Here's an image of Manhattan's skyline from Brooklyn 10 miles away.
Here's Boston from 15 miles away.
Here's Toronto's skyline from Adjala-Tosorontio, roughly 30-50 miles away.
![]()
Here's Toronto from Niagara Falls 41 miles away.
![]()
I'm not tooo good at the horizon formula but if you know your way around it you can share what the yield would be with the classMy point here is, if any of the palaces are in the 100-200m range in height, they'd be visible in most of the shots, but they aren't. Would like some proposal through horizon measurements maybe?
now for this one, do we know if the short but wide pillar used as reference in the second image same as the first one? the colored one does not show the thin pillarsOverall I don't think that Las Noches is supposed to be this country sized palace due to not only the visual contradictions but the fact that there's nothing we see implying that it's that large throught the arc other than Nel's statement. As for the replacement size I don't fully agree with the 5 kilometers value (I have seen an offsite calc giving a size of 13km which probably makes more sense), Although I did find that the scaling Las Noches to its height found from the blast that Ichigo's cero creates is pretty consistent giving a 5.9km width for Las Noches. (The cero was used on the left side of the palace which is why i used that location in Las Noches for the height)
Luckily there's a calculator.I'm not tooo good at the horizon formula but if you know your way around it you can share what the yield would be with the class
I basically share these same thoughtsFor which I'd say
- Yes.
- Ideally only if necessary (so, if the manga provides no usable visuals), but if 1 is rejected, then yeah.
- Yes.
- No.
- If 4 is accepted, then yeah.
- Yes
Im for option B personally. Discarding the statement is silly to me if we want a true averageOption B : Damage3245
All (valid) visual shots + nel's statement get averaged together to reflect the most accurate end
No, I'd prefer Option A over Option B. But of course, prefer different options significantly more than both of those.Agna would you like to also greenlight Option B since the others were rejected? if you do then we can proceed with that