- 14,865
- 12,370
So not just omnipotence, not just omnipotence for a character with a R>F difference, but preferably invoking logical possibility, without conflating it with mathematical possibility (as that would nerf it to just Low 1-A)?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@AntvasimaEither way: From what can be gathered, the margin of agreement-to-disagreement is 8 to 1, so far, and Qaws hasn't been around to this in a hot minute despite the recent ping. In my mind there is no necessity for further reinforcement, either, so, I'd say it's fine to call the wraps on this.
Considering the fact that this thread is almost done, I hope it is fine to ask some queries related to this thread and the previous one?Either way: From what can be gathered, the margin of agreement-to-disagreement is 8 to 1, so far, and Qaws hasn't been around to this in a hot minute despite the recent ping.
What I want to know is how will we deal with a character who is explicitly stated to be Transdual/completely transcendent to the distinction between Reality & Unreality while also not having enough evidence or necessarily a perfect portrayal of Transduality.I fully agree that the perfect extent of certain abilities, like Transduality for example, are completely different from even what I refer to as a qualitative superiority. Indeed, a truly transdual character can't really be said to have a "qualitative superiority" (Or even a "meta-qualitative" superiority, which is what I defined High 1-A as), because it would be above qualities to begin with. By that token, equating it to a qualitative superiority is as much of a category error as equating a qualitative superiority to a quantitative superiority.
So, if you get me a character that's essentially a perfect portrayal of Transduality, for example (Which is to say, most robust description possible with no contradictions to that status whatsoever), I'll have no issue with saying that character is Tier 0, for the same reasons I say R>F and BDE are inherently above dimensional jumps.
Depends. "Reality/Unreality" might very well not be a dichotomy that's actually indicative of power whatsoever. For instance, in DC, the Sphere of the Gods and its realms are referred to as "fictions" where the physical realm is reality, but the former are not really ontologically inferior to the latter. A verse can treat "unreality" as just a parallel, comparable state of existence to reality if it wants, in which case I don't think that'd have a concrete tier.Considering the fact that this thread is almost done, I hope it is fine to ask some queries related to this thread and the previous one?
As you have stated in the previous thread:
What I want to know is how will we deal with a character who is explicitly stated to be Transdual/completely transcendent to the distinction between Reality & Unreality while also not having enough evidence or necessarily a perfect portrayal of Transduality.
Said character cannot be just 1-A cos its just a R>F difference while the character completely transcends this quality. Will it just be 1 layer into 1-A? Will it be High 1-A/Meta-Qualitative layer or something even higher?
Stuff happened since then, so sorry about the lack of participation. Though personally I don't think I would've added a major argument to anything so I got nothing against Ultima closing the thread and moving on.Do you want to add anything here?
To clarify, what is the next step?Okay. Thank you to everybody who helped out here.
Yes. And rewriting the explanation pages accordingly. I'm working on that as we speak.To clarify, what is the next step?
Drafting the new FAQ and Tier list changes?