I know this topic has already been addressed in my previous thread, but it's worth revisiting: Pralaya and Mother Night can be seen as interpretations of the Great Darkness, without being strictly identical to it.
One objection is that the Great Darkness transcends belief and, by extension, the Collective Unconscious. While this is true, transcendence doesn't preclude manifestation or interpretation. Even God is perceived in multiple forms and names across different belief systems, while remaining a single underlying principle transcending all. Similarly, a pre-creational Darkness can express itself through distinct entities.
Another objection concerns its duality with the Light of Creation, with Pralaya being portrayed as capable of extinguishing this Light. However, this is not a contradiction. The duality between Darkness and Light is relational, not limiting: Darkness does not depend on Light for its existence, but is defined by it. Thus, the ability to "extinguish" the Light is not unique to Pralaya since the Great Darkness almost did the same.
Therefore, Pralaya and Mother Night should be considered distinct expressions of the Great Darkness, sharing a common underlying essence while retaining their own identities and characteristics. I am not proposing a merger because these entities remain distinct enough, just to say that Pralaya and Mother Night are different interpretations of the same pre-creational darkness. This would not affect scaling, but a new key would need to be added in the profiles of the Great Darkness if this proposal is accepted.
What do you think ?