Wesker018
He/Him- 1,256
- 1,336
@Robo432343 so the main wincon was the layers right? can´t we use the same argument to say those with a lot of layers like dante/mundus win too?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
oh lolno i just put him there![]()
I heard about that, but that doesn’t seem to be case now? I feel like that would’ve been fixed by now (that and Sol’s match with Kai Ninjago happened so)i thought guilty gear was 6-D before the tiering revisions but no one bothered to edit it
Check the "Small Tweaks to Invulnerability" thread where Armor is proposing a name change and the "It's time we talked about layers and qualitative superiority" thread (This comment from DontTalkDT specifically).Is there a thread for this
Check the "Small Tweaks to Invulnerability" thread where Armor is proposing a name change and the "It's time we talked about layers and qualitative superiority" thread (This comment from DontTalkDT specifically).
Layering should not be applied when an ability overpowers a resistance through magnitude or a quantitative threshold. Overcoming heat resistance by using hotter fire is not an example of layered fire manipulation, neither is overpowering mind resistance by focusing psionic energy from a larger number of targets down to an individual; as those are increases in magnitude. These will still be treated as an increase in potency, though.
It's not even the nuking part that makes me angry. It's that the same man who proposed layers, DT himself, is now removing it because his verse Toaru is getting mogged for not having enough layers. It's kinda funny if you ask me.Lowkey nuking layers is a good idea. It makes some matchups impossible to argue because people just spam "X character has 48582484 layers hax so it's a stomp FRA."
DontTalk's new comment implies the proposal would gut how we do layers currently, with his new proposal, verses will have to find other methods to find layers that don't involve a mere increase potency/magnitude in power.Actually the thread about layers still keeping layers, but DontTalk and Agnaa said layer isn't an absolute wincon in a vs match anymore, hax potency and other qualities are still need to be considered in a match
Hard to do, probably there are some verses out there can get, but this just make hax layer into a pseudo-resistance negation which rather we just nuke layer altogetherDontTalk's new comment implies the proposal would gut how we do layers currently, with his new proposal, verses will have to find other methods to find layers that don't involve a mere increase potency/magnitude in power.
Wait, the NEP layer is layer for state of existence ability, DontTalk comment only affect layers for offensive hax bruhhhh![]()
lol this is a good example of whats going on right now with layers
PAIN SUFFERING AGONY TORMENTHard to do, probably there are some verses out there can get, but this just make hax layer into a pseudo-resistance negation which rather we just nuke layer altogether
Very few verses, if at all, actually have layers for states of existence. Almost all of the verses overwhelmingly employ layers for offensive hax.Wait, the NEP layer is layer for state of existence ability, DontTalk comment only affect layers for offensive hax bruhhhh
I think we do have layered Incorporeality or Intangibility, but yeah, AE1 is very hard to have layer, almost impossibleVery few verses, if at all, actually have layers for states of existence. Almost all of the verses overwhelmingly employ layers for offensive hax.
Like, how often are you going to find people even more abstract than AE1 CM1 entities?
DontTalk's new comment implies the proposal would gut how we do layers currently, with his new proposal, verses will have to find other methods to find layers that don't involve a mere increase potency/magnitude in power.
Hard to do, probably there are some verses out there can get, but this just make hax layer into a pseudo-resistance negation which rather we just nuke layer altogether
D&D just keeps on winning
I mean I'd argue D just beats them anyways, but that'd require actually going back and arguing about the DBH aura stuff. And to be quite honest, I do not care. D is not only not a character I am a particular fan of (mostly because I only know of him in the periphery), but also because I cannot be ****** to argue with DBH supporter about this. So yeah, they can share the spot.Does that mean VHD just incons with DBH because of their conceptual aura effects
I mean by what measure? D's profile was updated in March of last year, and I'd say its format is entirely fine, better than the average, even. But if you mean in terms of content, then yeah, sure, could be, no idea how true that could be.Part me of me feels D’s profile is massively outdated.
No?Hard to do, probably there are some verses out there can get, but this just make hax layer into a pseudo-resistance negation which rather we just nuke layer altogether
And layers are still as easy to get as before, even if the system of the verse uses a UES for its layers, the main thing that segment is about is cutting out layered fire manip and layered poison manip stuff, if someone uses mindhax on a hundred people and can focus that on a single person, that hax is more potent, and thus stronger, through a quantative means, meanwhile if someone uses mindhax on someone who already resists it, even if they have it through having or manipulating stronger energies, that hax is more layered, and thus stronger, through a qualitative means.DontTalk's new comment implies the proposal would gut how we do layers currently, with his new proposal, verses will have to find other methods to find layers that don't involve a mere increase potency/magnitude in power.
It is and honestly it worked as a pretty good metric system in my opinion. Yeah it sucked to hear your character gets outdone in terms of layers, but at least it was an accepted, straightforward way to understand why characters within the same tier were superior to one another despite having the same abilities. Really, all removing layers is going to achieve is have a bunch of people wanking tf out of their character because "well this guy is >>>>>>> x character>>>>>>>>>>y character fodder" and actual bullshit like that. Basically the same way people already are with REcorrect me if im wrong but isn't layers the best way to tell who wins in a fight? like if character A has 20 layers for all his abilities and he's fighting B who has 15 layers for all his abilities then character A simply stomps
Its insignificant 12D, not big enough to be tierable in the 1-B tier.Honkai mfs seems to have 12-D bs, why are they allowed on the list?![]()
Actually, RE does **** all and nothing rn on wiki, RE is currently only accepted to exactly what it has shown, not one toe beyond that line, quoting the page itselfBasically the same way people already are with RE
Layer stacking wasn't actually accepted to exist for RE (at least you only get +1 layer from it from the instance of evolving to resist a hax, and then no further) beforehand, and unless you were from AWLBA (which isn't an exception due to whatever, its an exception due to it having showings), you got your +1 layer and that was itIts extent and complexity only go as far its feats and scaling have gone for it, in relation up to countermeasures to powers that already exist in the setting or similar, in a case by case basis.
I beleive the one's that don't have 12d stuff can be included on the listHonkai mfs seems to have 12-D bs, why are they allowed on the list?![]()
Unfortunately it's pretty difficult to tell which characters do and don't have the 12D stuff (combat applicable) unless you're knowledge about the verse or go through every profile, for example she clearly has 12 stuff.I beleive the one's that don't have 12d stuff can be included on the list
There extra dimensional range is preety much useless
Most of the 12d stuff is just range and not some actual potency as they scale to compact dimensions only one's with hde get any benefitUnfortunately it's pretty difficult to tell which characters do and don't have the 12D stuff (combat applicable) unless you're knowledge about the verse or go through every profile, for example she clearly has 12 stuff.
On a side note can we just acknowledge the insane power creep HSR went through? Like I get the premise was a cosmic fantasy while traveling on a space train but already having tier 5 to 4 feats with at least tier 2 deities relatively early in the games cycle and now even the mid tier characters are L1-C these days (those without useful 12D stuff) and that's after the verse got downgraded repeatedly too.
These gacha games don't mess around.
This is probably the only time I'll commet on this thread this year lol!
This entire thread would say otherwise lmao, GoW fans were arguing exactly what you just saidActually, RE does **** all and nothing rn on wiki, RE is currently only accepted to exactly what it has shown, not one toe beyond that line, quoting the page itself
Layer stacking wasn't actually accepted to exist for RE (at least you only get +1 layer from it from the instance of evolving to resist a hax, and then no further) beforehand, and unless you were from AWLBA (which isn't an exception due to whatever, its an exception due to it having showings), you got your +1 layer and that was it
Seen the exact opposite elsewhere, but if I need to grab the og overhaul thread I willThis entire thread would say otherwise lmao, GoW fans were arguing exactly what you just said
I mean, I'm not really trying to contend, argue for, against, or be for anything. I just pointed it out because it's so ironic how stupidly incoherent and inconsistent the wiki can be with upholding it's standards lol. It's kinda whatever at the end of the day, battle boarding is one of the worst experiences on this site, double so for popular versesSeen the exact opposite elsewhere, but if I need to grab the og overhaul thread I will
It is, that's why I'm going to revise the whole thing top to bottom.Part me of me feels D’s profile is massively outdated.
Don't think anyone will have an issue with it, and if they do they can make a matchup ig. Tho...whatever happened to DBH's 3 state para phys?
Oh damn nvm then, I was gonna ask how ND and its states could interact with things like NEP 2 and vice versa, but ig it'd have ended in an incon anyways![]()
Dragon Ball's paraconsistent/nonduality removal
Here it's mentioned that Time Power is a nonduality because it contains history and nonexistent history but as some users have pointed out recently that it wouldn't qualify as you would need to prove nonexistent history serves as a direct negation to history (for example it needs to be like...vsbattles.com
Yeah, but isn't this entire list based on SBA?actually doesn't anos stomp amaterasu if speed is not equalized?
yes but SBA does not assume speed is equalizedYeah, but isn't this entire list based on SBA?
I confused thread rules with SBA, yeah nvm. I guess you can put Anos on par with, or above Amaterasu if you wantyes but SBA does not assume speed is equalized