• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

(ACCEPTED) Sliming all Honkai Scaling (GONE BRUTAL)

Status
Not open for further replies.
But the literal previous two sentences talked about how the inheritance of dimensions involves a "give and take"/"trade off".
This makes no sense. So you're saying that the bubble world take away 7 extra dimensions from the SoQ? So what the bubble world give to the SoQ?, this make SoQ turned into a simple 4-dimensional structure

In another scan, it talks about how different worlds have completely independant laws and dimensions
Laws are irrelevant without further contexts, and independent dimensions just mean they are separated; they have their own dimensions that not dependent on anything

Otto right before this talks about how laws are constantly changing for non-stable words.
Laws mean the principles of how thing operate, not really something affect the number of dimension or their size

There is no evidence to suggest that an 11D bubble cannot exist within the sea.
I don't think anyone contest this, except me, I guess, because the game literally have Otto saying the world is 4D space-time and Imaginary Space scan also said the same thing

Anyway, unless something new being brought up, i will agree with Low 1-C for now, though the verse still have 11D extra-dimensional range

Time for me to sleep, it is midnight in my timezone
 
I don't think anyone contest this, except me, I guess, because the game literally have Otto saying the world is 4D space-time and Imaginary Space scan also said the same thing
i cant see the scan but the 4D world is literally talking about leaf world and not bubble worlds what does this have to do with soq and bubble worlds, leaf worlds and IT is separate thing here and otto outright calls IT higher dimensional realm so Imaginary space being 4D is nonsense
 
My fault for not including the full sentence. It should be

"we know, that 3 dimensional soap bubbles will form an almost 2 dimension surface; these bubble worlds, compared to all eleven dimensions of the "ether bathtub", all have to make "trade-offs" for iheritance"

For me at least, I understand this as dimensions are curved during the inheritance process.

As for the laws stuff, I brought that up to purely to show that the 4+7 string model wouldn't apply to every world, with the possibility of 5+6 string, 6+5 string, etc. Following that logic, there should exist an 11+0 string world, which would require the SoQ to have 11 non-curved dimensional axis
 
i cant see the scan but the 4D world is literally talking about leaf world and not bubble worlds what does this have to do with soq and bubble worlds, leaf worlds and IT is separate thing here and otto outright calls IT higher dimensional realm so Imaginary space being 4D is nonsense
Where did I say IS is 4D?? Also, IIRC Bubble World is literally the reflection of Leaf World on the IT, Leaf World fallen from the Tree down to the Sea also become Bubble World


As for the laws stuff, I brought that up to purely to show that the 4+7 string model wouldn't apply to every world, with the possibility of 5+6 string, 6+5 string, etc. Following that logic, there should exist an 11+0 string world, which would require the SoQ to have 11 non-curved dimensional axis
Again, no offense, nice fanfiction though
 
Last edited:
Where did I say IS is 4D?? Also, IIRC Bubble World is literally the reflection of Leaf World on the IT, Leaf World fallen from the Tree down to the Sea also become Bubble World



Again, no offense, nice fanfiction though
Before u go, can u tag sum mods?
 
Where did I say IS is 4D??
im out of meds sry
Also, IIRC Bubble World is literally the reflection of Leaf World on the IT, Leaf World fallen from the Tree down to the Sea also become Bubble World
doesnt matter when they inherit the dimensions from soq at the end of the day
Where did I say IS is 4D?? Also, IIRC Bubble World is literally the reflection of Leaf World on the IT, Leaf World fallen from the Tree down to the Sea also become Bubble World



Again, no offense, nice fanfiction though
you should at least debunk it with a source instead of calling it fan fiction what is with all of you today going “negative tracking negative reading nice headcannon etc” its no wonder we got 10 pages now
 
doesnt matter when they inherit the dimensions from soq at the end of the day
Bro, the IS scan literally contradict Bubble World being 11D. You are hand-waving away contradictory evidence but I don't think this is that relevant

you should at least debunk it with a source instead of calling it fan fiction what is with all of you today going “negative tracking negative reading nice headcannon etc” its no wonder we got 10 pages now
The fanfiction stuff is a light joke, but on a serious note, why do I need to debunk an argument that is literally backed by nothing?. He made an extraordinary claim about different worlds having different dimensional setups; he need evidence to back it up, not me debunk it
As for the laws stuff, I brought that up to purely to show that the 4+7 string model wouldn't apply to every world, with the possibility of 5+6 string, 6+5 string, etc. Following that logic, there should exist an 11+0 string world, which would require the SoQ to have 11 non-curved dimensional axis

I was against the Low 1-A rating before and my viewpoint hasn't shifted. I don't view Imaginary Space as a valid justification for Low 1-A and I agree with the proposal by the OP.
this is so fast

I wonder if it's possible to do that ngl.
i don't think we need to, unless people start spamming nonsensical thing that not related to the thread

Anyway sleep, bye
 
The fanfiction stuff is a light joke, but on a serious note, why do I need to debunk an argument that is literally backed by nothing?. He made an extraordinary claim about different worlds having different dimensional setups; he need evidence to back it up, not me debunk it
here

pretty blatantly states different worlds have different dimensionalities
 
prefer if the staff voice on what they prefer between 2-C and Low 1-C before proceeding.
The dimensions from the game are standard M-Theory which is Tier 2. The Manwa/Comic gives a debatable dimensional difference, so it's probably a 5D membrane with 6 compacted string dimensions. So Low 1-C if you scale to the entire thing.

this is so fast
???
 
I thought that the Imaginary Tree already qualifies for the 5D Bulk though?
No everything related to brane cosmology m
theory and 4+7D comes from SoQ
Imaginary tree has none of that mention unless u can give it via being born from sea of quanta but HSR calls IT “unrivaled” lol
 
No everything related to brane cosmology m
theory and 4+7D comes from SoQ
Imaginary tree has none of that mention unless u can give it via being born from sea of quanta but HSR calls IT “unrivaled” lol
IT has +1D through Welt statement. SoQ kinda gets it due to 5D bulks being the standard
 
IT has +1D through Welt statement. SoQ kinda gets it due to 5D bulks being the standard
I linked very early into thread (or in hsr disc i forgot) that IT and SoQ both cannot be explained as mere 4D constructs and IT is outright called higher dimensional in comparasion to 4D space times (leaf worlds) so its 5D trough that then it can be 6D via +1D from welt
 
I linked very early into thread (or in hsr disc i forgot) that IT and SoQ both cannot be explained as mere 4D constructs and IT is outright called higher dimensional in comparasion to 4D space times (leaf worlds) so its 5D trough that then it can be 6D via +1D from welt
Why can't it be described by that because it's higher dimensional by Welt's statement? What's the reason for separating the two.

Not like, ya know, that isn't explained by the 5D bulk. I already said this to you multiple times in the thread, but whatever
 
Welt does not mention that wth?
Welt statement is short for the alien key stuff. If we know an R>F dimension exists for IT, then that same dimension can be sufficient to explain the need of higher-dimensional math. Not that, you know, string theory can't do the same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top