- 5,540
- 6,746
- Thread starter
- #361
Yea...? Sure as hell would fit no bulk I know lolSo what youve been say is the SoQ’s dimensions are compactified because the dimensions the bubble universes inherit from the SoQ are compacted
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yea...? Sure as hell would fit no bulk I know lolSo what youve been say is the SoQ’s dimensions are compactified because the dimensions the bubble universes inherit from the SoQ are compacted
Mind you it's been half a dayOmg we reached 10
I see your point, it could just be my lack of knowledge on higher dimension stuff or wtv but why would the bubble universe’s inherited dimensions affect the SoQ? Couldnt it just be summed up to not all bubble universes cant inherit 11 dimensions from the SoQ thus making those dimensions compact and finite for the respective bubble universe? Correct me if im wrong thoughYea...? Sure as hell would fit no bulk I know lol
That just doesn't sound coherent in any theory I know. Plus, even if it was a coherent relationship, you have no statement of SoQ being any certain type of dimension aside from the inheritable compacted ones, which by smthn like Occam's Razor ig, you can js say it also has them compacted.I see your point, it could just be my lack of knowledge on higher dimension stuff or wtv but why would the bubble universe’s inherited dimensions affect the SoQ? Couldnt it just be summed up to not all bubble universes cant inherit 11 dimensions from the SoQ thus making those dimensions compact and finite for the respective bubble universe? Correct me if im wrong though
It's already said multiple times that the SoQ itself is 10 dimensional space and 1 dimensional time, do you think the 6 dimensional space here is finite? No, they're infinite, that's literally it. You cannot have Ether Bathtub which contains infinite amounts of Bubble Worlds and for it to be on the same level as the Bubble Worlds, you don't even debunk the entire Sugar Space stuff that's within SoQ in the first place anyway which is the qualitative superiorityThat just doesn't sound coherent in any theory I know. Plus, even if it was a coherent relationship, you have no statement of SoQ being any certain type of dimension aside from the inheritable compacted ones, which by smthn like Occam's Razor ig, you can js say it also has them compacted.
Maybe @StrymULTRA has some thought on this. He also seems quite knowledgeable on the physics here
All of this can be explained with a 5D bulk. Which is something I'm fine with giving anyhow lolIt's already said multiple times that the SoQ itself is 10 dimensional space and 1 dimensional time, do you think the 6 dimensional space here is finite? No, they're infinite, that's literally it. You cannot have Ether Bathtub which contains infinite amounts of Bubble Worlds and for it to be on the same level as the Bubble Worlds, you don't even debunk the entire Sugar Space stuff that's within SoQ
Isn't or is?And I don't believe I am required to explain why something Low 1-A being not only equal to, but also born from an 11D thing, isn't an immediate disqualifier.
Ok bro I wrote that part quickly. But u get the intentIsn't or is?
Would these not qualify?That just doesn't sound coherent in any theory I know. Plus, even if it was a coherent relationship, you have no statement of SoQ being any certain type of dimension aside from the inheritable compacted ones, which by smthn like Occam's Razor ig, you can js say it also has them compacted.
Maybe @StrymULTRA has some thought on this. He also seems quite knowledgeable on the physics here
Yea but wouldnt they qualify for statements of the SoQ being 11 dimensional and not compact?Isn't this just the SoQ again?
No...? Because we know the functions of SoQ. Strym's earlier statement was just about vague n-dimensional spaces, and we would just assume it'd extend infinitely into those directions. But since we are aware of how this "11D" space operates, we can't do that.Yea but wouldnt they qualify for statements of the SoQ being 11 dimensional and not compact?
I believe OP is not arguing that every dimension is compactified but rather that because of the sea of quanta's 11 dimensions, 7 are compactified, that leaves only 4 tierable dimensionswait
if every single spatial dimension in the verse is 'compactified' like you are proposing then why is time and space meaningless in sea of quanta and why is there no time nor boundary in the sea
the more i think about it the more the proposal doesn't really make sense
why are qualitative superiorities being brought up? isn't the verse only possibly Low 1-A?It's already said multiple times that the SoQ itself is 10 dimensional space and 1 dimensional time, do you think the 6 dimensional space here is finite? No, they're infinite, that's literally it. You cannot have Ether Bathtub which contains infinite amounts of Bubble Worlds and for it to be on the same level as the Bubble Worlds, you don't even debunk the entire Sugar Space stuff that's within SoQ in the first place anyway which is the qualitative superiority
Bro what juxtaposition? Is it too much to ask for you to wait till a translator comes?I got this:
Which considering it's juxtaposed with the Bathtub explanation, probably means the inheritable dimensions are compactified innately, no? Would go hand-in-hand with other explanations (like the tangled weed one). So I'm assuming that's what "inheritence" means? How many compactified dimensions you take from SoQ? That's functionally the same thing I've been saying this whole thread regardless
In his defense waiting for translators can be frustratingBro what juxtaposition? Is it too much to ask for you to wait till a translator comes?
Is the "For example" in the section you sent me not true?Nowhere is it stated that compacted dimensions is the default.
Because Bubble World inherits 7 finite dimensions, the basic assumption is that the SoQ 7 dimensions also should be finite, because if they are infinite, then Bubble World also must inherit the same properties, which should have been stated to also be infinite. Unless the verse directly separate the nature of Bubble World's inherited dimensions from SoQ dimensionsIt's already said multiple times that the SoQ itself is 10 dimensional space and 1 dimensional time, do you think the 6 dimensional space here is finite? No, they're infinite, that's literally it. You cannot have Ether Bathtub which contains infinite amounts of Bubble Worlds and for it to be on the same level as the Bubble Worlds, you don't even debunk the entire Sugar Space stuff that's within SoQ in the first place anyway which is the qualitative superiority
the absence of evidence isn't always evidence; in fact, most of the time here on our wiki, if the verse simply stated there are X number of dimension without further elaboration, we also assume they are unknown in size thus also untierableNowhere is it stated that compacted dimensions is the default.
i don't think the statements need to wait for translators because even MTL align with Fan translation, so pretty much Fan translation isn't wrongIn his defense waiting for translators can be frustrating
Again, that is specifically that one world. It effectively says "A world within the SoQ has 4D+7D strings". It says nothing about the nature of the dimensions in the SoQIs the "For example" in the section you sent me not true?
Ok thank you for the clarification!i don't think the statements need to wait for translators because even MTL align with Fan translation, so pretty much Fan translation isn't wrong
What Vietthai said above. It is extremely strange for a world to inherit compacted dimensions from SoQ and for them to still be bulks. You'd need additional proof for your position at the very least.Again, that is specifically that one world. It effectively says "A world within the SoQ has 4D+7D strings". It says nothing about the nature of the dimensions in the SoQ
Unless Fan translation is also MTL, which, from how the texts is structured, i don't think so, and even the lastest statement from english version of HI3rd also implied the same thing by saying dimensions are tangled up into weed, which is pretty much saying compactified string dimensions, unless the english statement is also a mistranslation from CN text. But if this is true, then half of what is currently on the cosmology blog are mistranslation scans which mean the verse need to be revised and rebuilt from the ground upOk thank you for the clarification!
So basically it's more likely that the text says the dimensions are compactified rather than not compact?Unless Fan translation is also MTL, which, from how the texts is structured, i don't think so, and even the lastest statement from english version of HI3rd also implied the same thing by saying dimensions are tangled up into weed, which is pretty much saying compactified string dimensions, unless the english statement is also a mistranslation from CN text. But if this is true, then half of what is currently on the cosmology blog are mistranslation scans which mean the verse need to be revised and rebuilt from the ground up
yeahSo basically it's more likely that the text says the dimensions are compactified rather than not compact?
goodyeah
Put it in this site: https://postimages.org/good
imagine an image of metal Sonic giving a thumbs up cuz idk how sending images works
Put it in this site: https://postimages.org/
Click Ctrl+P and then insert the link you copied from the image
But the literal previous two sentences talked about how the inheritance of dimensions involves a "give and take"/"trade off".the absence of evidence isn't always evidence; in fact, most of the time here on our wiki, if the verse simply stated there are X number of dimension without further elaboration, we also assume they are unknown in size thus also untierable
I mean an infinite structure can contain finite things within itThe sea is also stated multiple times to be boundless (not the tier), endless, etc, so any dimensional axis it has should be infinite.
Yea, they give the compacted dimensionsBut the literal previous two sentences talked about how the inheritance of dimensions involves a "give and take"/"trade off".
Ok.In another scan, it talks about how different worlds have completely independant laws and dimensions
Ok^2.Otto right before this talks about how laws are constantly changing for non-stable words.
It exists, it's literally the example given to us.There is no evidence to suggest that an 11D bubble cannot exist within the sea.
First part can be true without the second. You can have infinite 3D but curled dimensions.The sea is also stated multiple times to be boundless (not the tier), endless, etc, so any dimensional axis it has should be infinite.
Nobody's debating this bro.Since there is no reason an 11D bubble cannot exit, no matter how unlikely, due to the sea containing an infinite number of worlds, the sea must be able to hold an 11D bubble
Ok^3.As such, the Sea should be 11 full dimensions
if i might ask then, if an 11D bubble exists why would that exclude the SoQ from being 11D and containing more of these bubbles?It exists, it's literally the example given to us.
It's 11D with compacted dimensions. Nothing stops SoQ from being 11D with compacated dimensions as well.if i might ask then, if an 11D bubble exists why would that exclude the SoQ from being 11D and containing more of these bubbles?
if i might ask then, if an 11D bubble exists why would that exclude the SoQ from being 11D and containing more of these bubbles?
![]()
It being 11D isn't the problem, the problem is that 7 out of those 11 dimensions are atom sized
Oh is there a rule limiting image spam? I'm sorry I didn't realize it that's mb.I see you abusing the system now
UnderstandableIt's genuinely getting so tired explaining this. It's like I have to repeat it over and over and over again. I'd rather talk to a brick wall at this point
Nono. It's just a joke. You can make as many comments with images as u wantOh is there a rule limiting image spam? I'm sorry I didn't realize it that's mb.
Nono. It's just a joke. You can make as many comments with images as u want