• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

(ACCEPTED) Sliming all Honkai Scaling (GONE BRUTAL)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
5,458
Reaction score
6,526
Ok, so I believe the Honkai fandom had their fun and stuff with the recent L1A upgrade.

Unfortunately for them though, this gave me time to ruminate on further scaling. Particularly regarding the context of certain concepts within the verse, as I, self-admittedly, am a total Hi3 noob.

And as a result of this, I’ve come to the conclusion that this verse... is hot ass.




Exhibit A
{
Sea of Quanta}

I'd like to begin this with the words of our good friend, Vietthai:
The primordial chaos is the Sea of Quanta bruhh

Now, why is this relevant? Well, because it ties into general lore about Honkai which is that the Imaginary Tree is equal, is born from, and literally grows through the Sea of Quanta. The same Imaginary Tree, which for all intents and purposes, was upgraded to Low 1-A in the previous CRT.

The reason then, why this is particularly damming, is the issue that the Sea of Quanta is 11-dimensional:

SBubble3-(1).webp

And I don't believe I am required to explain why something Low 1-A being not only equal to, but also born from an 11D thing, is an immediate disqualifier.

Now, I can already hear someone saying:
  • But Nova, that scan says "Ether Bathtub", not "Sea of Quanta."
And to that, I can simply present this rather recent explanation of the SoQ; an explanation, which directly identifies the Sea as the Bathtub:


Not that, mind you, the scans already present in the cosmology page didn't functionally say the same thing; they just conflated the terms for different things out of nowhere.

And another thing I might hear is in relation to Imaginary and Real Space:
  • Well, the cosmos is called the Imaginary Tree, so it must mean that the Tree only extends to the physical universe, and not Imaginary Space (what is Low 1-A here.)
Issue is, that just as of recently in 3.7, we have attained this statement:
Screenshot-2026-01-06-234849.png

For the uninitiated, this conversation is happening within Path Space, aka Imaginary Space. And in this same Path Space, Cyrene clearly stating "Cosmos's real Space-Time", implies that the "Cosmos", or the Imaginary Tree, contains both Imaginary and Real Space. Which is to say, that the Imaginary Tree itself, as the "composite whole", is Low 1-A--subsuming both Real and Imaginary Space.

Other proof for it can be stuff like this (singularity here referring to main proponents of the Low 1-A Imaginary Space scale), or for other stuff like this:
This theory describes the various worlds existing in different spacetimes as having a tree-like structure. Every branch is a specific path along which worlds might exist, with every leaf being the marks these worlds have made along the parameter of time. The crown of the tree remains in a dynamic state as it absorbs the masterless Imaginary Energy from the space-time vasculature of the trunk. New shoots grow, withered leaves fall, and endless births and deaths occur among the infinite universe... Describing the universe's structure as a "tree" may be an attitude that views the Imaginary Tree as a life form.
Which clearly state the source of Imaginary Energy is the Trunk. A role, which is the equivalent of Imaginary Space.

So what's the conclusion? Well, the Imaginary Tree should go down from Low 1-A, to the same tier which Sea of Quanta resides in.

Which, speaking off... hehe.



Exhibit B
{
Sea of Quanta 2.0: Compactification}

I will present merely these 3 scans:
Screenshot-29.webp


SBubble5.webp


Pv-Rdx-BZ-d-1.webp


Now, if you've read them, then you should hopefully be clear on the mechanics behind how the Bubble Worlds are formed; in that, the various membranes of the Sea of Quanta, by having a distance small enough so that the very membranes (i.e dimensions) that make them up, overlap within each other, creating a 4-dimensional space.

Which is to say: the spatial dimensions of the Sea of Quanta are compactified, or in other words, too small to qualify for tiering.

And if you'll notice in the cosmology blog, you'll realize that this description is consistent every time it is mentioned (I mean, "tied like a knot"? Come on.) Heck, the verse literally affirms, not just M-Theory, but particularly the most popular version of it: string theory. Which is compactified.

In response to this fact, I had been mentioned by the verse-supporters this. In that, the dimensions, even if compacted, would qualify for size since they are infinite.

Well, three problems:
  1. The scans refer to the number of dimensions, not their size.
  2. This would contradict the earlier statements about SoQ.
  3. Considering that the verse isn't High 1-B right now, I can accurately assume that there's a very good reason why these scans are untrustworthy. (Which I can expect is to do with the usage of the verb "can be")
And even if they were actually talking about size, and even if they were truly infinite; they still wouldn't work here. For this, I'd rather just use the words of @BestMGQScalerEver:
“Can be unlimited” note how it doesn’t say all dimensions must absolutely be infinite you can have infinity in respects to some dimensions while the rest are compact. Having infinite sized dimensions doesn’t contradict compact ones as well

So then, what does this leave us? Well, this. In here, although there is little to see--sort of clarifies an R>F relationship between at least 1 single higher dimension, which might be applicable for +1D.



Conclusion
So with all that's been said, I propose that the entire verse is downgraded from already-shaky Possibly Low 1-A down to the measly tier of 2-C (for containing SoQ and IT as definitive and distinct universes), or depending on how we treat the last Welt scan, even Low 1-C. (Should be mentioned, that if Tier 2 is to be the majority-decided conclusion here, the exact number of universes can be argued and debated [preferably in a second thread]. I just gave the bare-minimum tier possible for the verse.]


Votes:

@Planck69
(Agree; Low 1-C)
@Vietthai96 (Agree; Low 1-C)
@Qawsedf234 (Agree; Low 1-C)
@Reiner04 (Agree; Low 1-C)
 
Last edited:
I disagree with Sea of Quanta not being 11-D.
 
Ok, maybe it took a little... but I got distracted. :D

Also it's really late so I'ma take a nap (don't get too crazy while I'm gone)
 
I disagree with Sea of Quanta not being 11-D.
In any case, before I go a mimir, I have time to clarify this claim:

The issue is, that the Bubble Worlds are explicitly formed by the compactification of the membranes (dimensions), which is to say, that it the compactification and “string-ness” of the dimensions exists prior to the Bubble Worlds. This, obviously, revokes any coherent idea of bulks, but also more importantly confirms that the dimensions are already small enough to intertwine with one-another (as the scans LITERALLY say).

Anyways, gn. Ima reply to the rest when I wake up.
 
Also about Low 1-A, I disagree with multiple reasons: Imaginary Tree always underpinned the Imaginary Space like Path Space and Eden of Blessed Insight in which these two are frozen in time akin to Real Space, that's why we are able to save everyone in the cosmos (or Real Space precisely), there's a superiority between Path Space and Real Space in which Aeons have to descend to Real Space from Path Space, that is to say they have to manifest themselves which is consistent.

Imaginary Tree was stated to be unrivaled to the Sea of Quanta, 12-D comes from the Real Space of the Tree itself being superior than the Sea of Quanta in the Notes section since Otto who transcended reality, he transcended SoQ.

Also, if I have to clarify, it's more of like Otto transcended the Ether Bathtub of the Sea of Quanta instead of the true nature of SoQ, but you get my point that the Imaginary Tree is superior than the Sea of Quanta nonetheless.
 
In any case, before I go a mimir, I have time to clarify this claim:

The issue is, that the Bubble Worlds are explicitly formed by the compactification of the membranes (dimensions), which is to say, that it the compactification and “string-ness” of the dimensions exists prior to the Bubble Worlds. This, obviously, revokes any coherent idea of bulks, but also more importantly confirms that the dimensions are already small enough to intertwine with one-another (as the scans LITERALLY say).

Anyways, gn. Ima reply to the rest when I wake up.
Yeah but that's for bubble worlds, in the Honkai Energy page, they scale from the Ether Bathtub directly..
 
Yeah but that's for bubble worlds, in the Honkai Energy page, they scale from the Ether Bathtub directly..
I think most the confusion comes from the most recent explanation of the SoQ (the video linked in the op) where schrodinger describes the SoQ as a bath with the bubble worlds in them so logically anyone would asume that the SoQ = the ether bath my problem with this is the ether bath and ether anchors have been stated to exist in the SoQ in other media (durandal) and i dont think the ether bath has ever been brought up in hi3 aside from ether ‘anchors’ which are described as higher dimensions, so its likely to assume schrodinger was talking about the Ether bath and not the SoQ as a whole. I dont think the SoQ or the tree or IMS are limited to 11D though just the Ether bath and bubble worlds
 
theres whole brane cosmology and m theory shit on hoyo cosmology page
and theres the fact IT holds infinite space time realms (leaf worlds and branches, mind you each branch has infinite worlds bcs of otto who made literal branch was stated to be infinite) thanks to genshin having universe sized leaf world AND bubble words genuenly being fallen leaf worlds both would be 2-A anyway
Idc about rest bcs i ******* cant debate anymore i wanna post my own crt but yall charge headfirst into every ******* crt
 
disagree with not beign 11D, its pretty straightforward. Now idk about L1A
L1A is definitely arguable and im not good with that higher tier 1 stuff but im pretty sure the statement of kiana transcending dimensions is pretty literal so id only agree with IMS entities being L1A and maybe the IT being 1A (L1A sounds better imo but wtv) since its unrivaled
mnTsg5Bl.png

This should also include false god otto and kevin or we just nuke low 1-A all together which idm
 
my problem with this is the ether bath and ether anchors have been stated to exist in the SoQ in other media (durandal) and i dont think the ether bath has ever been brought up in hi3 aside from ether ‘anchors’ which are described as higher dimensions, so its likely to assume schrodinger was talking about the Ether bath and not the SoQ as a whole.
Yeah I second this, as far back as I recall they never treated ether bath = SoQ, the durandal VN is also the only time they go very in depth about it. Also why a downgrade right after just upgrading the verse what was even the point lol
 
Sigh so Nova unironically did it, in just mere hours even.

I would like to reference some parts normally, however I am salty at the verse as of now and supporters seems fine by their own.

Natural,

Following.

I just hope Nova stay safe after this whatever the conclusion be
wait the verse got upgraded?
 
Yeah I second this, as far back as I recall they never treated ether bath = SoQ, the durandal VN is also the only time they go very in depth about it. Also why a downgrade right after just upgrading the verse what was even the point lol
The downgrade being made by the same person who went through all that work to updated the verse to Low 1-A just waste his own efforts now
 
wait the verse got upgraded?
If you mean HoYo, I mean yeah, Nova had upgraded it himself. Crazy? I know.


Every verse needs a nova

Honestly when I said I am "natural" it is basically "not that I agree but whatever"

I second this, Nova is his own debunker to balance his upgrade, a true follower of Equilibrium. Also, threads that don't have at least 10+ pages are boring.

Anyway that's all I'd say for now since I do not wish to drill anything.
 
The 1-C downgrade makes sense, everything there is very damning, especially the direct confirmations of compactified dimensions. I'll wait a bit on the Low 1-A downgrade portion to see if there are any proper counter arguments.
sorry if am dumb, but this is for the sea of quanta?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top