- 35
- 9
As I just said, i didn't know that wiki was used as a transcript of codex.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
Udlmaster
Any/All- 7,498
- 3,070
I think a mod should regulate the discussion happening in this thread.
I have no idea why, but ExcelsIsBerny's first response in the thread was to be incredibly passive aggressive, condescending and rude;
I've never spoken to this person before, but I don't know why they're being so incredibly argumentative and passive aggressive right off the bat, especially with the indirect insult towards the people in the thread as "Ridiculous", as it should be pointed out the thread was about to be closed as several people, including myself and staff, had agreed with the thread.
Not here to demand a warning, just that a member of staff moderate the chat because they're only making it a deeply unfun experience with their tone.
I have no idea why, but ExcelsIsBerny's first response in the thread was to be incredibly passive aggressive, condescending and rude;
(This is in response to me saying they should stop with the passive aggressive tone)
I've never spoken to this person before, but I don't know why they're being so incredibly argumentative and passive aggressive right off the bat, especially with the indirect insult towards the people in the thread as "Ridiculous", as it should be pointed out the thread was about to be closed as several people, including myself and staff, had agreed with the thread.
Not here to demand a warning, just that a member of staff moderate the chat because they're only making it a deeply unfun experience with their tone.
Last edited:
ExcelsisBerny
She/Her- 1,663
- 2,939
I’ll just say this: the moderators can read the whole thread (not just those cherry-picked lines) and they’ll see who’s actually incredibly pressed about people disagreeing with him.
At no point have I called anyone in the thread “ridiculous.” I only said that the tier given to a part of the cosmology is ridiculous, completely different thing.
The user here has been trying to label me as aggressive from the very start of this exchange, simply because I’m the one opposing his position in the thread.
His actitude should genuinely be punished somehow.
At no point have I called anyone in the thread “ridiculous.” I only said that the tier given to a part of the cosmology is ridiculous, completely different thing.
The user here has been trying to label me as aggressive from the very start of this exchange, simply because I’m the one opposing his position in the thread.
His actitude should genuinely be punished somehow.
Udlmaster
Any/All- 7,498
- 3,070
Indeed, I invite the mods to read the thread, as these weren't "cherrypicked lines" but examples of your behaviour, and from the first message I responded to, I've pointed out that your tone is harsh.
Goofy in the same thread disagreed with me and the others, so it has nothing to do with simple disagreement, likewise, I didn't say you directly called anyone "ridiculous" either.
As I said, Goofy himself disagreed with the thread and at no point did I say anything about his tone while he was disagreeing, because there wasn't one. I do not make it a habit of asking for moderator intervention when someone disagrees, as that thread demonstrates.
I'm simply asking for some decorum in your behaviour.
Goofy in the same thread disagreed with me and the others, so it has nothing to do with simple disagreement, likewise, I didn't say you directly called anyone "ridiculous" either.
As I said, Goofy himself disagreed with the thread and at no point did I say anything about his tone while he was disagreeing, because there wasn't one. I do not make it a habit of asking for moderator intervention when someone disagrees, as that thread demonstrates.
I'm simply asking for some decorum in your behaviour.
ExcelsisBerny
She/Her- 1,663
- 2,939
I’m gonna be honest, you have a serious problem with taking things out of context and playing the victim. People explain things to you directly, and you just ignore the explanation and keep pushing your personal agenda.
It’s not an insult (neither direct nor indirect) towards anyone. I already explained (and it’s pretty obvious) that I’m talking about the tier, that the tier assigned is ridiculous because it’s far from what that part of the cosmology actually scales to.
And I’m fully within my right to bring up disagreements if the logic being used is flawed.
Honestly, you’re someone I never want to run into again on this wiki. I'm dropping it here.
Udlmaster
Any/All- 7,498
- 3,070
I have no idea why you're quoting "I didn't say you directly called anyone "ridiculous" followed by a quote of me saying you was indirectly doing it as if this proves anything other than what I said. To clarify, my initial point was about indirect language, so quoting me on the absence of a direct accusation doesn't contradict my statement.
I also have no idea how you have suddenly come to the conclusion I have a "serious problem" when we've never met nor spoken before today. Your behaviour is incredibly inappropriate and passive aggressive and the worst I have done to you was asking you to stop with the passive aggression, which you refused to heed, so I took the necessary steps in asking for a Mod to regulate the thread.
Making personal judgments, such as suggesting I have a "serious problem," is inappropriate and unproductive. My request for a moderator was a direct result of the conversation becoming personal rather than topical. Your subsequent suggestion that I be punished for this request has made it clear that a constructive dialogue is no longer possible. It's clear you're retaliating because I didn't capitulate to your argumentation on a debate website. Maybe you shouldn't automatically attribute hostility in my disagreements and instead accept the fact I just do not agree with you instead and that I may perhaps have another view.
I also have no idea how you have suddenly come to the conclusion I have a "serious problem" when we've never met nor spoken before today. Your behaviour is incredibly inappropriate and passive aggressive and the worst I have done to you was asking you to stop with the passive aggression, which you refused to heed, so I took the necessary steps in asking for a Mod to regulate the thread.
Making personal judgments, such as suggesting I have a "serious problem," is inappropriate and unproductive. My request for a moderator was a direct result of the conversation becoming personal rather than topical. Your subsequent suggestion that I be punished for this request has made it clear that a constructive dialogue is no longer possible. It's clear you're retaliating because I didn't capitulate to your argumentation on a debate website. Maybe you shouldn't automatically attribute hostility in my disagreements and instead accept the fact I just do not agree with you instead and that I may perhaps have another view.
- 177,271
- 90,152
- Thread starter
- #30,848
@AKM sama @DontTalkDT @Mr. Bambu @DarkDragonMedeus @Just_a_Random_Butler @Agnaa @Celestial_Pegasus @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @GrathOfLux @Dereck03 @Planck69 @LephyrTheRevanchist @JustSomeWeirdo @Theglassman12 @Duedate8898 @Armorchompy @CrimsonStarFallen @LordTracer @Emirp sumitpo @FinePoint @Elizio33 @Mr._Propeller_Hat @AbaddonTheDisappointment @Catzlaflame @ActuallySpaceMan42 @Nierre @Reiner04 @Dalesean027 @Oblivion_Of_The_Endless
We need your help with resolving all of our ongoing issues here.
We need your help with resolving all of our ongoing issues here.
- 2,060
- 3,918
Chezztercakey has responded here:
He accidentally logged out of his account due to stress, and hasn't been able to log in again yet.
Antvasima
vsbattles.fandom.com
That’s not true, no. This is the blog he posted, and after a quick google search this is the blog I found on Quora. Nigh-identical. He says he only copied Earth/Texture/IS/Gods stuff, but just as one example outside of that, in the “VV/Venus” section:
Quora:
Blog:
Off a quick glance, really the only differences I’m seeing are slight changes in the wording here and there.
It’s also hard to believe he did anything based on his own research when Wank provided rather explicit evidence that he hasn’t read the series.
For the record, using external blogs isn’t exactly against the rules, iirc we even had an almost successful downgrade of a pretty relevant verse based on a copied blog. In this case, I’m more bothered by the mischaracterization of his role, something which I believe is enough to warrant a warning at least.
Not particularly; I think this sums up my thoughts:
I don’t think we can really prove much either which way, which would normally shift me towards the pro-appeal side, but at the same time though, considering the specific circumstances surrounding the user, I think there’s enough reasonable doubt for me to see the manipulation option as not too farfetched either, so I’ll abstain.
- 35,060
- 41,649
So Baldiback made another High 1-B DOOM thread again despite facing the threat of a permaban.
Did we discuss what to do regarding his punishment yet?
Did we discuss what to do regarding his punishment yet?
- 177,271
- 90,152
- Thread starter
- #30,853
@AKM sama @DontTalkDT @Mr. Bambu @DarkDragonMedeus @Just_a_Random_Butler @Agnaa @Celestial_Pegasus @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @GrathOfLux @Dereck03 @Planck69 @LephyrTheRevanchist @JustSomeWeirdo @Theglassman12 @Duedate8898 @Armorchompy @CrimsonStarFallen @LordTracer @Emirp sumitpo @FinePoint @Elizio33 @Mr._Propeller_Hat @AbaddonTheDisappointment @ActuallySpaceMan42 @Nierre @Reiner04 @Dalesean027 @Oblivion_Of_The_Endless
We still greatly need your continuous help in this thread.
We still greatly need your continuous help in this thread.
Astral_Trinity439
He/Him- 4,347
- 6,318
Thank you. I'll try my best and make sure to not break any rules in the future.I have unblocked Astral_Trinity439 now.
What should we do regarding our remaining currently ongoing cases here.
- 2,060
- 3,918
I commented on everything already, but here are concluding remarks:We still greatly need your continuous help in this thread.
- I’m fine with Bambu’s Baldiback compromise of a 2 year ban. Since there’s 3 staff in favor (me, finepoint, Bambu) feel free to apply.
- me, Finepoint, and Bambu are fine with a warning for both in the Iamunanimous/Meiouhades debacle, which I will add to the tracker. @Iamunanimousinthat @MeiouHades This is an official warning, due to your recent arguments across the sailor moon/DB threads. Please make an effort to be more civil, moving forward.
- with Deadlymonarch’s case, I did favor a very short 2 wk ban initially, but reviewing the case again it does seem like he’s willing to change and genuinely apologetic so I’ll do as Finepoint did, and support a warning instead. So 2 in favor of a warning, Qaws said he’s fine with a warning or a ban, and Bambu perferred a ban iirc, considering there’s enough support for at least a warning, I will go ahead and do so. If @Mr. Bambu or anyone wants to pursue the ban, then we can continue from there. @DeadlyMonarchChewstheDirt This is an official warning. Please do not contact authors with leading questions in accordance with our discussion rules.
- 34,628
- 41,944
Seems reasonable to me.
- 337
- 138
I would like to report a concerning pattern of behavior exhibited by the user " @Jockey-1337 " that I believe constitutes harassment, vote manipulation, and an abuse of influence within the VS Battles Wiki community. Recently, Jockey has been persistently targeting my Tier 0 CRT involving Gan. Despite not having an official say or relevant authority in the matter, he continues to spread his personal opinion across unrelated threads and discussions, implicitly shaping others’ views without engaging directly or constructively where it matters. In private messages, he has sent me statements such as “All Hail The Crimson King” in a provocative tone, which I interpret as an attempt to mock or intimidate me, especially considering the context of my CRT. This behavior is not only inappropriate, but also harmful, as it creates an atmosphere where open discussion becomes stifled by indirect pressure and popularity bias. His repeated actions—subtly undermining my CRT, trying to sway public opinion through off-topic comments, and sending targeted private messages—fall under vote manipulation and personal harassment. These are clear violations of community standards regarding respectful engagement and fair evaluation of content. I request that this situation be reviewed by moderation. I believe everyone should have the right to contribute without being subjected to coercion, ridicule, or biased interference.
- I'm not opposed to him evaluating the topic from his own perspective, but his insistence on interfering — even with messages I’ve sent privately to others — makes me think he’s actively trying to undermine the CRT I’ve opened. Moreover, he keeps sending me unrelated things in private messages, seemingly trying to imply something, which I find concerning.
Last edited:
- 2,060
- 3,918
On this forum, you don’t need “relevant authority/an official say” to be able to comment on a thread. As long as he’s abiding by the rules, that’s fine.
Not a rule violation, all he did was ask Finepoint to clarify his vote.
Tbh, I don’t know the context here to determine if it’s provocative, but if you don’t want him to reach out to your message wall, he should comply with that, yes.
@Jockey-1337 please explain why you messaged that on Jason’s wall, and I think he would prefer it if you don’t message him, so please don’t do so.
- 337
- 138
No. The problem isn't that he stated his opinion. The problem is that instead of simply expressing his view and stepping aside, I believe he's abusing the CRT because of a personal issue he has with me. Even though Kairach agrees with Benimoe, he privately messaged him saying that this CRT wasn't valid. Kairach refused to accept that and I believe he's doing this not as part of a debate, but simply out of spite. Because this CRT, from A to Z, consists solely of the arguments I presented to him and the ones he presented to me.
This is the same reason as mentioned above. Jockey has already presented all his arguments more than enough times (and repeatedly), and I’ve responded to him. At this point, I believe he’s doing it just to pin me down. Therefore, I believe he should be prohibited from replying to this CRT any further. He has already expressed his opinion multiple times, and I’ve listed him under the "disagrees" section.
- EDIT: Of course, I’m not asking for something stupid like wanting Jockey to be banned from this wiki. I’m just saying that, because of his negative actions, he shouldn’t be posting messages in the Tier 0 CRT opened for Gan or trying to convince users of his own opinion outside the CRT. (He’s already stated his opinion — that’s not rude in itself.)
Last edited:
- 7,780
- 11,569
I don't really see anything here which constitutes any kind of manipulation other than in the literal sense of being an active participant in the overall conversation, my apologies.
Also, I actually encourage people to ask me to clarify if they're ever uncertain of where I stand, especially for a topic this complicated where my opinion is likely to change overtime.
Also, I actually encourage people to ask me to clarify if they're ever uncertain of where I stand, especially for a topic this complicated where my opinion is likely to change overtime.
- 34,628
- 41,944
I agree with Catzlaflame. Also, Jockey has been around since 2014, he is often strange and usual, and perhaps often overly enthusiastic, but he's not actually the malicious type. And the posts I saw aren't really anything that would fall under a rule violation.
- 337
- 138
Okay. I agree with you, maybe I was a little too hasty in my decision.
All I ask is that he stop commenting on CRT because it's causing too much confusion. Others are free to express their own opinions. I've had a similar argument with Goofy here before.
- 7,780
- 11,569
I really don't think that's fair if they haven't done anything wrong.
They've mostly had constructive comments, from what I can tell.
- 337
- 138
Actually, no — the problem is that in his earlier texts, he presented an article quoted by Pennywise as if it was said by the Crimson King in the CRT, which clearly indicates confusion.
- 7,780
- 11,569
I don't think one mistake is reason to thread-ban someone.
If they misquoted something just say that.
- 337
- 138
I think you misunderstood. I never said I wanted Jockey to get banned or anything like that. I just said he should stay away from the CRT because he's causing confusion. He's already stated his opinion more than enough, and I added him to the 'disagrees' section. Also, he made the same mistake not once, but twice — even after I warned him the first time.
- 7,780
- 11,569
Well, even if we don't actually click the button per-se, to tell him not to respond to the CRT is effectively thread-banning him.
I think it would set a terrible precedent if we started silencing opposition on threads just for being active and making a few mistakes.
- 177,271
- 90,152
- Thread starter
- #30,870
Agreed.
- 1,718
- 273
It was a joke that doesn't contain anything aggressive, and it is the only message I sent to him. So it is neither harassment nor spam.
I also sent the same comment to my friend on a different site, there is nothing bad.
Also, if I'm here - I want to ask mods to fix the OP of the thread. For some reasons, @Jason_Voorhees1986 ignores me , I asked him to fix the OP - #1, #2, #3.
Jason counts votes of people who agree with him and does not count votes of people who disagree. That is undemocratic.
You may check the materials. Most of the materials that support your interpretation come from legends, myths, folklore and mortal people who are not sure.
My interpretations are based on materials that come from children with supernatural abilities, the Crimson King's avatar (a nigh omnipotent character of the universe) and the Glossary (an omniscient narrator - Author/Viewer).
- 1,718
- 273
What? It is a lie.
I sent only 1 message, and you can see it on your wall, not PM.
- 35,060
- 41,649
- 2,258
- 1,076
No rule breaking, but probably a warning.
Can someone explain to @Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera that:
He needs to stop assuming bad things about everything he's told
vsbattles.com
That his opinion is worth the same as anyone else's, so he should stop being so self-important.
vsbattles.com
And that he's not the center of attention, that no one has the need to try to surpass him, and that everyone deciding to stop interacting with him isn't something he should be proud of, nor does it make him the winner of anything.
vsbattles.com
In general, try behaving for once (he's got like 5 warnings already, right?).
I know it's not serious, but he keeps having the same attitude constantly (I usually follow several threads, including some he's in, like the Zelda thread, Pokemon, Death Battle, the Pokemon Master Canon, among others). And his attitude is always the same. I think this is literally the first time we've interacted, and he couldn't get through two messages without making a problem with my opinion and trying to stand out by belittling me for having a different opinion than his. (I admit I was a little petty at the end, but still)
To be honest, I would say something myself, but we would probably fill up the Pokemon thread for a while, which would be problematic for the rest of the people present.
Can someone explain to @Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera that:
He needs to stop assuming bad things about everything he's told
Pokemon Discussion Thread - Red & Blue arc
I'm given to understand Mega Evolutions are still the most popular new form/upgrade for old Pokémon mechanic even after all the attempts to replace them, so it's probably smart to bring them back and keep using them.
That his opinion is worth the same as anyone else's, so he should stop being so self-important.
Pokemon Discussion Thread - Red & Blue arc
I'm given to understand Mega Evolutions are still the most popular new form/upgrade for old Pokémon mechanic even after all the attempts to replace them, so it's probably smart to bring them back and keep using them.
And that he's not the center of attention, that no one has the need to try to surpass him, and that everyone deciding to stop interacting with him isn't something he should be proud of, nor does it make him the winner of anything.
Pokemon Discussion Thread - Red & Blue arc
I'm given to understand Mega Evolutions are still the most popular new form/upgrade for old Pokémon mechanic even after all the attempts to replace them, so it's probably smart to bring them back and keep using them.
In general, try behaving for once (he's got like 5 warnings already, right?).
I know it's not serious, but he keeps having the same attitude constantly (I usually follow several threads, including some he's in, like the Zelda thread, Pokemon, Death Battle, the Pokemon Master Canon, among others). And his attitude is always the same. I think this is literally the first time we've interacted, and he couldn't get through two messages without making a problem with my opinion and trying to stand out by belittling me for having a different opinion than his. (I admit I was a little petty at the end, but still)
To be honest, I would say something myself, but we would probably fill up the Pokemon thread for a while, which would be problematic for the rest of the people present.
Last edited:
- 16,258
- 24,923
Yeah this behavior needs to stop. All Sparkive did was express a completely innocuous and inoffensive opinion (comparing rival characters in a video game series) and Sean apparently took it as a personal attack (or "an attempt to upstage me", as he put it).
- 7,780
- 11,569
They were banned for a week over this kind of thing pretty recently, after two separate warnings.
So if it's still happening, we likely need to escalate further, probably at least a month.
- 2,060
- 3,918
Unfortunate to see considering I was the one who pushed to lower his earlier ban length.
That being said, I think that a month ban is fine, but also, since the Pokémon discussion thread seems to be the primary outlet for all his elitist yapping I would push for a thread ban there as well.
That being said, I think that a month ban is fine, but also, since the Pokémon discussion thread seems to be the primary outlet for all his elitist yapping I would push for a thread ban there as well.
Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera
He/Him- 5,382
- 1,149
What rule did I even break? I'll admit that I'm kinda in a perpetual bad mood from how bad all my CRTs are doing, but taking things personally isn't a rule break, especially in my case when I feel I have actual reason to feel that way (and looking at the amount of Likes on comments that talk about punishing me).
Obviously Sparkive listing how he feels about the Pokemon rivals, on its own, is not an attempt to upstage me in any way, but the context of me stating my displeasure with the S/V rivals beforehand and his comments towards me after that are.
I genuinely don't know what people mean by "elitist", because this is just the way I talk, and if you got responses like this and people talked about you like this and this for years, you would start to think people don't like you and learn to nip insults in the bud too.
Obviously Sparkive listing how he feels about the Pokemon rivals, on its own, is not an attempt to upstage me in any way, but the context of me stating my displeasure with the S/V rivals beforehand and his comments towards me after that are.
I genuinely don't know what people mean by "elitist", because this is just the way I talk, and if you got responses like this and people talked about you like this and this for years, you would start to think people don't like you and learn to nip insults in the bud too.
- 5,386
- 4,827
Buddy @Definitelynotbatman0110 was restating a fact. I was joking around with him. We clearly weren't trying to insult you.
