You need that bigger space containing or embeding the universe in it self. Qaw say just being bigger not same as embeding the universe
That's only if you want Realm A (The Container of the Multiverses) to be Low 1-C.
The gist from the above staff is that if an infinite Realm A is a smaller size when viewed in Realm B, Qualitative Superiority is at play.
It same i think
That would have been the case before the standards changed at best. Now what you're saying is no different from the issue with Space Beyond.
For this to work you have to prove that the Space Beyond contains infinite multiverses. From what I see the scene just says that there's a future multiverse in front of them.
It's been previously accepted by staff that the Space Beyond contains an infinite number of multiverses.
I'm getting mixed messages from you and other staff.
So what's the statement saying that?
It's the principal of a power set or a set of infinite infinities. It'd not just a small space, it has to be infinitesimal (or the space has to be called infinite in comparison).
I didn't want to interfere, but they don't give QS anymore. This was already mentioned in the title.
So for example, I could have an Infinite Realm be the size of a basketball in a higher plane, and that wouldn't qualify for QS?
Only if the realm itself was infinite in comparison. Just being bigger isn't enough.
You said earlier that "If there's an infinite number of 2-A spaces contained within a fraction of a space, that would require a 5-D space to contain them." Ultima and Elizaa share the same sentiment of just being a smaller size is enough.
I did say that, but a key point there is "an infinite number". No one has shown that there's an infinite number of different multiverses in that space. Just two.
Here's a recent image of the Space Beyond.
I'm not seeing where the staff accepts an infinite number of multiverses in the Space Beyond. Just that the Multiverse itself is 2-A in size.
The above thread accepted that there are an infinite number of timeline branches.
And both of these statements are just 2A. Infinite timelines in an infinite timestream is just a 2-A structure.
I can see the Space Beyond being possibly Low 1-C then.
A question about low 1C, i think this a bit relevant with this thread
This has already been discussed and rejected before. That's why the standards have changed.
You need to be beyond infinite. You need a power set of infinity which is incredibly difficult to justify.
So some infinity of the infinity???
An infinite set composed of all types of infinities. As I've explained and said multiple times before.
Thank you for the input.
One more question sir, what about structure that can contain (not necesarry already contain) infinite number of 2A???
new standards my ass
Geor... qaw and fire is expert that literally participate for create that new standard
I don't really care, what's right is important here
No, not without a direct statement saying there's an infinite amount of those multiverses across the void. The most you can get is a possibly rating since nothing directly implies they take up an infinitesimal space
I've already answered that. It's not enough on its own as having a non-universal 5th dimensional axis would be enough to contain an infinite number of multiverses.
u say u dont care yet ur calling tier 1 experts
Thanks
And basically it was decided that things that were claimed to be Low 1-C were not Low 1-C in the thread...
Because they were the ones who made the standards. Do you understand or can you understand now?
