• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All Purpose Dragon Ball Thread

I’ll say it for the 69420th time, deleting the verse would literally solve ALL of these problems and then some. Why do people think it’s such a bad idea? Not like it hasn’t been done before. Should I make that CRT? Would it even be called a CRT? Or a Verse Deletion Thread?
You probally would need to do in a Staff discussion thread, and present your arguments there.
 
I never understood why people don't explain their argument better when they point out that what the opposition got from it was a strawman
 
I never understood why people don't explain their argument better when they point out that what the opposition got from it was a strawman
Partially laziness, partially the fact that if someone's willing to strawman you in the first place then they aren't engaging in good faith and no amount of correcting them will change that.
 
To be clear there is literally 0 chance deleting DB gets passed. You are welcome to make a thread for it but it's not ever going to happen for a verse that big.
 
So does Buu get stronger when the people he absorbed gets taken away? cause I’m DB FOREVER it says that Buu does indeed get weaker
 
<deagon says that people thinking that DB is underrated in the wiki is a travesty
<i call him out on it
<he says i'm strawmaning him
<i show him his own words where he did in fact call people disagreeing with him and how the wiki rates DB a a travesty
<'yes, i did say that, i stand by it'
<'but you still strawmaned me'

https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/1039604358922383470/1143682195375001783/MV5BNzBiYzcyZmQtYTg0MS00NDU2LWJlMGQtYmExMGJlY2U4MzI0XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTM3MDMyMDQ._V1_.jpg
 
Anyway, let’s try this again. Time for some math.
XKkqq.jpg

3 congruent squares. Find the sum of angles A+B+C. Show your work.
 
<deagon says that people thinking that DB is underrated in the wiki is a travesty
<i call him out on it
<he says i'm strawmaning him
<i show him his own words where he did in fact call people disagreeing with him and how the wiki rates DB a a travesty
<'yes, i did say that, i stand by it'
<'but you still strawmaned me'
You seem to be leaving out the ways in which your description of my stance deviated from what I actually said.
 
Meiou, cool it. You don't need to hover around for the sole purpose of taking shots at people over and over again.
 
To be clear there is literally 0 chance deleting DB gets passed. You are welcome to make a thread for it but it's not ever going to happen for a verse that big.
I atleast curious about the arguments he could made, are you not? It could be fun.
And I’m the president of the United States.
Makes sense for the president of the United States to want delete the DB verse on this wiki.
 
You seem to be leaving out the ways in which your description of my stance deviated from what I actually said.
don't take this the wrong way, but i've noticed that you love saying a whole lot of nothing and pretend that you have a point
if you think i deviated from what you said prove it, you just going 'strawman' means jack
 
I feel like things would be less negative if DBS just had its head pulled out of its arse. We're still stuck on SH after over a year and the anime still isn't back in any sense, I've even heard the SDBH anime may be ending soon. We have an ongoing series where absolutely nothing is happening. Like damn, I just want to be out of this filler hell and back into a new arc with new techniques, new feats, new scaling, new anything.
 
let be real here, aside from the Low 1-C thread which i'm still participating, i care more about gathering scans and references for the verse. when I active on this wiki, like almost all DB profiles have no scan, can we focus on update the quality of our verse profiles???
almost like that's what I've been suggesting for a while now
 
He’s paying more attention to these universe 2 sailor moon rip-offs than any other DB fan did during ToP
 
In other thought, C looks like 45°, B should be lowered, 30 or 25°, A 15°, so calculating the sum will be 90°
 
In other thought, C looks like 45°, B should be lowered, 30 or 25°, A 15°, so calculating the sum will be 90°
C should be 45 for cutting the square in two perfect triangles.
For B and A just slap 1 on each side of the square and you have two different triangles and use pythagorium to find all sides. I don't know about geometry but I would think knowing about the sides would give the angle. B triangle is basically 1^2+2^2= root5 and A triangle is 1^2 + 3^2=root 10

No idea if there exists a better way to do it. Thinking about it.
 
They're all right triangles. C is trivially 45 because it bisects a square diagonally, but for the other triangles you need a big of trigonometry. The squares are the same distance so you know the ratios of the sides, so if you treat the sides of the square as "1" then you can get the ratios of the non-hypotenuse sides very easily and use an inverse tangent function to get the angle in question, but the numbers aren't nice pretty numbers in that case, but A and B add up to 45 so the final result is easier.

A = 18.4349488 degrees
B = 26.5650512 degrees
C = 45 degrees

A + B + C = 90 degrees.

There might be an easier way to do it, but all I remember from trig is Pythagorean theorem and SOH-CAH-TOA so that's the best I can do lol.
 
They're all right triangles. C is trivially 45 because it bisects a square diagonally, but for the other triangles you need a big of trigonometry. The squares are the same distance so you know the ratios of the sides, so if you treat the sides of the square as "1" then you can get the ratios of the non-hypotenuse sides very easily and use an inverse tangent function to get the angle in question, but the numbers aren't nice pretty numbers in that case, but A and B add up to 45 so the final result is easier.

A = 18.4349488 degrees
B = 26.5650512 degrees
C = 45 degrees

A + B + C = 90 degrees.

There might be an easier way to do it, but all I remember from trig is Pythagorean theorem and SOH-CAH-TOA so that's the best I can do lol.
I was somewhat correct?
 
Back
Top