-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 10,219
- 11,874
I'd like to bring up something.
Mysticcarnage's profile picture was Yor from Spy X Family, and Sythez himself seems to be a supporter of the verse as well, since he made a calc for it that also has to do with Yor. Make of this what you will.
Mysticcarnage's profile picture was Yor from Spy X Family, and Sythez himself seems to be a supporter of the verse as well, since he made a calc for it that also has to do with Yor. Make of this what you will.
- 7,915
- 15,096
- 4,744
- 7,347
This is quite clear cut, to be frank. A user joins one day after another user gets banned, they get involved in all of the same verses, post on the same threads, and display intimate knowledge of the wiki and the verses while claiming on numerous occasions to be unfamiliar with them. This is an archetypal example of what a sockpuppet account looks like.
I would endorse a permaban, of course.
I would endorse a permaban, of course.
- 243
- 86
"I'm diamond 1" is a popular meme phrase used in the valorant community. Making an account on the same dates is indeed sus but it really is just a coincidence. I stated I didn't know the series multiple times because the thread was about the series and I wanted to make sure my opinion on some of the topics weren't taken heavily since I got into a debate with 3 people. I have done this in many other threads for example. I really do not know how else I can prove it but I assure you I am not vapour. I am also not a supporter for spy x family, I actually quite dislike the verse due to me not liking the anime.
Is there any evidence you need ? For you to say I'm this account even though we do not share the same I.P is unfair in my eyes.
Is there any evidence you need ? For you to say I'm this account even though we do not share the same I.P is unfair in my eyes.
- 1,706
- 1,323
well i don't know if i can comment here, but to speak in defense of ShadowSythez, he seemed to be intereseted/ talked about multiple verses such as demon slayer baki record of ragnarok solo leveling attack on titan(this is the extent of what i know of)
his speaking patterns the way he talks and behaves as well as the way he argues is also completely different form vapourrr so i will really be quite shocked if he is a sock
and boy i sure do hope commenting here isn't ban worthy
his speaking patterns the way he talks and behaves as well as the way he argues is also completely different form vapourrr so i will really be quite shocked if he is a sock
and boy i sure do hope commenting here isn't ban worthy
- 7,915
- 15,096
All three accounts also have Lookism calcs in their wiki blogs.
This was his "verse downgrade list."
1 Demon slayer
2 Baki The Grappler
3 Lookism
4 Jujutsu Kaisen
5 Attack on titan
6 The Boxer
7 Spy X family
You've posted, in some capacity, about every single one of these verses.
Okay? Neither was Vapourrrrr.
This was his "verse downgrade list."
1 Demon slayer
2 Baki The Grappler
3 Lookism
4 Jujutsu Kaisen
5 Attack on titan
6 The Boxer
7 Spy X family
You've posted, in some capacity, about every single one of these verses.
- 177,372
- 90,238
- Thread starter
- #22,008
Oh. I apologise for not paying attention. It seems like you have a strong case then.
- 243
- 86
The lookism post came from a comment on agnaa's message wall. I am not to knowlegable on the verse but I explained why I was making the calculation in my original blog post.
I do not have a verse downgrade list ? Why are you bringing up false evidence when I have never made anything of the sort.
- 177,372
- 90,238
- 18,393
- 14,332
I unfriended Vappour on Discord because he had been blatantly faking niceness. I had forgiven him three times for being caught lying, but based on my personal experiences, I can confirm this.
As a matter of fact, I had instructed @Deagonx to take these actions. I'm not trying to be a snitch, but the fact that he took advantage of my kindness and continued to lie the same way three times crossed the acceptable line for me, and I felt the need to report it.
Both of them play Valorant and surprisingly have the same rank. Whenever he's online on Discord, ShadowSynthez is also online simultaneously. Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that they both share an identical mindset when it comes to calculation guidelines. Throughout the extensive debates we've had about TR in my DMs, they both argue in the exact same manner. There are no differences; their approaches are equivalent. It's to the point where when I read their debates in TR discussions, they sound indistinguishable, with only a slight difference in niceness to feign a distinct identity.
Please don't misunderstand me; I used to be someone who disliked using pattern coincidences as evidence. However, I've come to realize that there's nothing wrong with using them after all.
As a matter of fact, I had instructed @Deagonx to take these actions. I'm not trying to be a snitch, but the fact that he took advantage of my kindness and continued to lie the same way three times crossed the acceptable line for me, and I felt the need to report it.
Both of them play Valorant and surprisingly have the same rank. Whenever he's online on Discord, ShadowSynthez is also online simultaneously. Furthermore, I would like to emphasize that they both share an identical mindset when it comes to calculation guidelines. Throughout the extensive debates we've had about TR in my DMs, they both argue in the exact same manner. There are no differences; their approaches are equivalent. It's to the point where when I read their debates in TR discussions, they sound indistinguishable, with only a slight difference in niceness to feign a distinct identity.
Please don't misunderstand me; I used to be someone who disliked using pattern coincidences as evidence. However, I've come to realize that there's nothing wrong with using them after all.
- 18,393
- 14,332
I will do, no worries. I will take care of it!
- 7,915
- 15,096
@Passersby is likely another alt for Vapourrrrr. His account was made July 2022, but was inactive for a year until June 26th (the day after Vapourrrr's first ban), and is active in all the same verses.
- 12,761
- 15,251
Unless he’s a psycho or a very good actor I really doubt he could maintain a very different behavior compared to Vapourrr for such a long time.
He reached me out for some calculation evaluation and he’s VERY different from Vapourrr or MysticCarnage, both annoying users that get mar at anything.
He reached me out for some calculation evaluation and he’s VERY different from Vapourrr or MysticCarnage, both annoying users that get mar at anything.
- 243
- 86
I explained this please stop. "Diamond 1" is a popular meme in the valorant community. I am not vapour and I do not know who this person is. Please believe me if there is any evidence I can send I will send it.
- 177,372
- 90,238
- Thread starter
- #22,016
Well, the crucial issue here is that a Fandom staff member apparently checked and found that both accounts do have identity overlaps.
Thank you. It is very appreciated.
- 177,372
- 90,238
- Thread starter
- #22,018
Is there anything he can do (without revealing any personally compromising information) that would convince you that he is a different person, Deagonx and ImmortalDread?
- 18,393
- 14,332
Naw as @M3X_2.0 pointed out, he is way different, hell Vappour is not even interested in Demon Slayer, and the guy is completely different in every aspect. I am saying this through my personal interaction with him.
But hey, you can check the overlap to confirm this. I just highly doubt this.
- 177,372
- 90,238
- Thread starter
- #22,020
Is there a corresponding wiki account that the Fandom staff can check up?
- 177,372
- 90,238
- Thread starter
- #22,021
Okay. Thank you for the information.
- 7,915
- 15,096
Not really? The idea that some guy out there with an interest in all the same verses just happened to join the day after Vapourrrrr's ban, and is just the victim of extremely bad luck is too far fetched for me given Vapour's demonstrated propensity for making socks immediately after bans, and even Fandom thinks they're likely the same person.
Even more so that this @Passersby account comes to defend him out of nowhere, with a year long inactivity that ended the day after Vapourrrrrs first ban, who is ALSO interested in all the same verses.
This dude has a bunch of socks on the website.
- 1,706
- 1,323
wait hold on, now i am being suspected?
I'm sure this is just a coincidence though right?
i'm a bonafied demon slayer fanboy and a yoriichi tsugikuni simp....
anf for real, check everything i am not him
- 7,915
- 15,096
There is, but I doubt it'll reveal much because upon review it has no posts or edits, no pfp, etc. I will look at what bans were enacted around the time he arrived on the forum as this might connect him more definitively to other alts.
- 243
- 86
Passerby defended me because we formed a sort of friendship in the threads we participated in. Again I promise I'm not vapour and I will send you any evidence you request.
- 1,706
- 1,323
exactly, and for that matter as well, i never even participated in a TR thread...like ever
chill out dude, you might as well suspect every single account made in that time frame to be vapourrr's sock
- 18,393
- 14,332
Fandom's evidence is most likely can't be ignored, although they are not 100% unsure, they still indicate that there will be no problem to perform action. Deagonx analyzed each case of them and how unlikely those can be called as coincidences. Same mindset, same language, same interests, identical logs.
Even they are interested in the same games and series, I can't think of one thing to even distinguish any characteristics between both individuals.
- 13,880
- 22,736
I think it's likely that Shadow is a sock, but I'm not a fan of the fact that Passerby is suddenly being questioned as well. This is starting to turn into a witch hunt imo
- 177,372
- 90,238
- Thread starter
- #22,030
They also apparently consistently have a wide variety of IP addresses from those respective locations
- 18,393
- 14,332
Ya, for me, it is unlikely they are both the same. I have some personal experience with both, and I don't think they are the same person.
- 243
- 86
Again, any evidence I can send I will send.
- 1,706
- 1,323
- 7,915
- 15,096
Frankly I think some of you guys need a better bullshit detector. Passersby began posting July 3, 2022 - July 13, 2022. He made like 20 posts total, he then went inactive for an entire year. On June 26th, 2023 the day after Vapourrrrrs ban, he returns and immediately makes a Demon Slayer thread. On June 25th Vapourrrrr also made a Demon Slayer thread.
Then he arrives here unannounced to defend the other guy who Fandom thinks is a Vapourrrrr sock, who is posting in all the same verses and made his account the day after Vapourrrrrs permanent ban.
And we are meant to believe that there are three people involved, Vapour, who got banned on June 25th and August 2nd, and Shadow and Passersby, who just happened to become active on June 26th and August 3rd, yet they're all involved in the same verses and the stars just aligned for them to look extremely guilty of doing the thing Vapour was perma-banned for doing? Making alts right after his bans?
Then he arrives here unannounced to defend the other guy who Fandom thinks is a Vapourrrrr sock, who is posting in all the same verses and made his account the day after Vapourrrrrs permanent ban.
And we are meant to believe that there are three people involved, Vapour, who got banned on June 25th and August 2nd, and Shadow and Passersby, who just happened to become active on June 26th and August 3rd, yet they're all involved in the same verses and the stars just aligned for them to look extremely guilty of doing the thing Vapour was perma-banned for doing? Making alts right after his bans?
- 12,484
- 16,851
To the relevant parties, please reminder to not spam the thread. Let staff evaluate the situation.
- 177,372
- 90,238
- Thread starter
- #22,036
Hmm. @Vapourrrrr also has a wide variety of IP addresses from yet another part of the world. If he is using a VPN, he has been extremely meticulous with consistently completely hiding his tracks without slipping at all even for a moment, at least when visiting this forum, as all three of these account seem to be located in different continents.
- 243
- 86
Unless this vapour guy is a evil genius I would chalk it up to luck. Again I am willing to share all necessary information with you to prove I am not this guy.
Sorry. I want to prefice this though. I will send any evidence you need so I can prove I am not vapour.
- 20,441
- 16,252
Hi I am sorry that i am intruding here since I am not staff, but it is very much possible to open VSBW on both phone and pc and have vpn on both active and then post. It's that easy.
- 177,372
- 90,238
- Thread starter
- #22,039
Yes, that is true. I just think that he would have to be ridiculously attentive to not ever reveal an IP address from a different country than the standard one for each of these accounts.
- 13,880
- 22,736
On the contrary, I think you're starting to go a bit too far with this - again, to the point where I fear it'll turn into a sort of witch hunt that I feel is unhealthy for the site. It's not that I disagree on Shadow being a sock, I think that part is pretty likely, but I think the accusations against Passerby are largely unfounded.
Or perhaps I'm a sock as well for defending Passerby, I guess
