the same counterarguments you have yet to convincingly dismantle?
your initial reaction in my first couple replies was to passively aggressively wonder if I'd even read the thread, so how about you show a bit of patience and some better debate etiquette yourself, if that's the thread environment you really want.
Bruh, you literally called me stupid for stating the obvious and you were being aggressive prior to that. The only reason this thread is a mess is because you can't handle people disagreeing with you.
Trish never tanked anything from Dante, all she did was try to fry his ass while he was fighting Nightmare or having fun with her at the beginning of the game. In fact she was going to be killed by a rock so...
Like I said, demonic power can be controlled to make someone weaker or stronger so lady being able to tango with her isn't that relevant when most of the time Trish was playing around.
Nope, Trish pointblank blasts Lady with her magic
I mean... Trish does pretty much nothing in DMC 1, but she could harm and pin a casual Dante in the intro and suprise attack oneshot him after he fought with Nightmare. I guess Mundus considered Trish above Nelo Angelo
I called your argument stupid because you thought you were a genius saying “no shit” after I pointed out something you said was wrong. You alone ruined the thread my guy.
I don’t because that would be petty and because we’re still talking
What I refer to is mentioned on her durability justification.
“Most of the time” or all of the time? Seems like an important distinction to make, and one that you don’t have full confidence in going by your word choice.
Stop trying to close the thread deag, we are still discussing.
I am clarifying the current staff votes. I don't need your permission to do so, but thanks.
Noted. Having read through the thread, I am also a disagree, your points make more sense.
Given that you both still disagree, I assume you have something meaningful to say regarding my counterarguments in response to literally everything that has been brought up?
This may be an unfamiliar concept given the typical culture of people being unwilling to accept that they are wrong, but if I have no questions left then I will and have changed my mind about things like this in the past. Either way, there is no reason to close the thread, since there will most likely be a resolution reached on way or another
I very very directly addressed that in my recent counterargument.
Which is a cutscene, so this doesn’t have anything to do with game mechanics or anything.
I can also say firsthand that I have participated and seen threads where there is an initial staff disagreement and after extended discussion time, it manages to go through in one way or another, or comes to some sort of middle ground resolution.
Respectfully, I am not obliged to argue with you until you are personally satisfied with the state of the discussion.
All that I did was ask what their concrete stance was, and indicate that I agreed with them. That's it. Nothing that would justify this bizarre tantrum you're currently directing at me.
I am just going to straight up say you are quite condescending for a vsb thread moderator, calling this "foot stomping" and a "bizzare tantrum". Given last time, it's only natural that I'd be suspicious of you in the case that you try to close a thread before I can even finish typing my message again.
When you derail a thread with accusations towards me because I dared to ask other staff what their votes were and gave my own, it's only naturally that I call it like I see it. I'm not sure why you would get the impression that you can treat me however you want without me ever responding in kind.
You are more than welcome to be as suspicious as you want, I don't dictate your emotions, but that is not a justification for materializing that suspicion into derailing posts of accusations against staff members.
What did you think I was gonna do, wait for when you to close the thread before I tell you why you shouldn't close the thread? When a guy who likes to close threads proceeds to tally up staff votes, it is perfectly reasonable for me to call it like I see it.
I believed you were trying to close the thread and I acted on it. I am still certain that you want to close it, but that is beside the point
you should also probably say something about this, given that despite all the bs you've given me, this is still a crt, and we are still arguing about the topic at hand.
you and everyone else can ignore all that stuff
Well, preferably, you would wait until I gave some indication of closing the thread, rather than accuse me of scheming to close it for the crime of asking them what their votes were.
No I'm aware, he's had an ongoing hostility issue.
I'm not even going to entertain this.
Tony has been more hostile than I throughout all of this. I don't care if you have selective vision, but don't try and pin this shit on me.
You are the one who began the squabbling. You're free to discontinue it at any time. If you didn't want this CRT to turn into this, you should not have accused me of trying to close the thread when I never gave any indication of doing so.
I'm referring to a history of behavior beyond this thread.
Just because something helps the plot, doesn't automatically make it PIS. Sure, if they hadn't been there then Nero could have saved her, but all that means is that they were capable of stopping him in the first place. They could have easily made Sanctus himself stop Nero if he truly could just one shot all of them that easily.
as seen here, Nero was still struggling with them and it took him being completely enraged to do so. Moments before that, he was still struggling with throwing them around, and was very certainly not doing so casually.
You seemed to be doing it, I acted on that, you doubled down and didn't give any indication that you'd leave it open, so I acted cautiously.
resolved issues at best. Not only are you continuing the previous derail, but you are bringing up new things that have nothing to do with this instance. Just drop this before it goes anywhere.
Again, all I did was ask for clarification on votes and offered my own. Nothing that would justify your paranoia on the matter.
I was clarifying my stance.
You are just intentionally trying to make me look worse, which I don't really appreciate and am not just going to be quiet about. Seems like everything you add is just another little poke at my reputation or something. Just drop it, no negotiation on this point.
