• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

The user was acting aggressive, and has had several warnings and other bans before this one. Perhaps it was done swiftly, but with a rap sheet like that, I am not inclined to give advanced warning.

Either way, I will hear you out. What does he have to say in regards to the above report?
 
I mean, he could always send it to you for you to post here, but I just really don't see what he could even say? I mean, yes, he could describe the precipitating factors that led to him losing his cool in that thread, but the fact remains that he very definitively did say those things, they weren't appropriate, and he is on his fourth ban and who knows how many more warnings for the same behavior?

It's not like we perma-banned him, it was a month.
 
I think using the first times it was banned should not be brought to the table, people change over time. Anything before that January was years apart before and when covid

I feel it is somewhat ineffective to use someone as a conduit to say for another person that they were banned without them speaking first (I don't know if I'm expressing it well, this is the first time I've done this thing)
 
Oliver_de_jesus said:
I think using the first times it was banned should not be brought to the table, people change over time. Anything before that January was years apart before and when covid

I feel it is somewhat ineffective to use someone as a conduit to say for another person that they were banned without them speaking first (I don't know if I'm expressing it well, this is the first time I've done this thing)
Click to expand...
That seems like a good point.

Maybe a two weeks ban would be enough? And I personally wouldn't mind if he is allowed back to speak a bit for himself first.
 
LordGinSama said:
On god Dio simps are funny.


"Dio beats Alucard even when Alucard can regenerate, has greater durability and can in fact interact with the World. Time-Stop and speed will prove a hindrance but they can't overcome Alucard's greater durability and regeneration.
Click to expand...
This was the deleted message. Again, I completely fail to see how this changes anything. Gin engaged in some light banter (does anyone seriously consider "simp" an insult?), Dark decided to escalate the **** out of it.
 
Last edited:
Probably one of the last post that I will give on this matter.

Personally I feel that this will not reach anything more than in the best of cases shortening the time of BlackDarkness less than a month ban, also in the future if i see them in the same thread I will keep an eye on it to avoid any discussion and I propose to both try not to talk to each other

Copy and past from BD

"1st Gin has a vendetta against me since a thread where he got called out for his attitude and shit talk many years ago, last year in October he came in the death battle thread over the alucard vs dio topic to argue against anyone who disagreed with him , especially me, for which after he reported me over and told by staff he was at fault and to cease continuing this, yet does it again recently and again acts like the victim and for your info the fact he deleted a message before a report conveniently to make it seem i attacked randomly is just gonna be ignored cuz you say so?



2nd of all, if you are gonna use past instances against me, gin has a history as well so don't act like he is a saint or innocent, why is he coming in that thread over the same topic to engage with me knowing last time what happened. He escalated it by saying he lives rent free in my head and that he was offered staff role and refused, how im at fault for him getting there to me again and he gets triggered over the most little things, let alone you ignore his messages he wrote after as nothing? Im not gonna accept 1 month ban over bloating against me"
 
KingTempest said:
This done today?
Click to expand...
bywThMl.png
 
Oliver_de_jesus said:

Click to expand...
Gin's being snarky yes. Is that worthy of anything more than a light "yo, knock it off"? No, it ain't.

That's just how some people be. I for one engage in stupendous quantities of snark and sarcasm, and I would be oofed many long years ago had that been an offense. So would a good chunk of this wiki, as well.
Oliver_de_jesus said:
2nd of all, if you are gonna use past instances against me, gin has a history as well so don't act like he is a saint or innocent, why is he coming in that thread over the same topic to engage with me knowing last time what happened. He escalated it by saying he lives rent free in my head and that he was offered staff role and refused, how im at fault for him getting there to me again and he gets triggered over the most little things, let alone you ignore his messages he wrote after as nothing? Im not gonna accept 1 month ban over bloating against me"
Click to expand...
The difference being that Gin doesn't have any relatively recent offenses. Dude is barely even active, and how long has it been since he was called to the RVR? Plus there is no world where getting unreasonably pissed at "rent free" is a justified reaction. That is internet slang 101, what the **** are you even doing here if that's the thing to set you off?
 
TheMonkeMan said:
Yeah no, soon as I clicked on the link it took me to another ******* tab and tried to make me download something.
https://media.**********.net/attachments/1001598025556312125/1093987683631644672/image.png?width=1195&height=302
Click to expand...
That's the biggest spanish anime site, and has ads so you just clicked in ads, the site itself is unharmful.
 
First_Witch said:
Interpreting: Kazuma is a Mashle fan, and basically said that they are going to be busy because the first episode of Mashle the anime adaption dropped. Its still reportworthy though, because piracy link lol.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that post definitely has to be removed, as it links to a shady anime website with intrusive ads.
 
I would need to report a violation regarding the changes made on Hinata's page despite having 2 staff members agree with the downgrade on the thread, the thread was still going and the changes to be applied were never agreed upon by the staff members.
Link of the thread
 
Suigetsuhyugs said:
the thread was still going and the changes to be applied were never agreed upon by the staff members.
Click to expand...
No, this is fine.

If 2 or more staff members agree to the changes, they don't need to agree with the changes being applied, as that's directly implied.

If you want the thread to be opened for further discussion, you would have to consult the staff members who agreed with the changes and/or the staff member who closed the thread.
 
Kachon123 said:
No, this is fine.

If 2 or more staff members agree to the changes, they don't need to agree with the changes being applied, as that's directly implied.

If you want the thread to be opened for further discussion, you would have to consult the staff members who agreed with the changes and/or the staff member who closed the thread.
Click to expand...
The staff agreed on downgrade not on having the tiers changed all to unknown in the way it did.
 
Suigetsuhyugs said:
The staff agreed on downgrade not on having the tiers changed all to unknown in the way it did.
Click to expand...
Kachon123 said:
If you want the thread to be opened for further discussion, you would have to consult the staff members who agreed with the changes and/or the staff member who closed the thread.
Click to expand...
The thread seems to have been closed prematurely then.
 
Uh, I may have been the one to close that. Either way, this would probably better be handled in another thread. It's not necessarily a strict rule violation. Perhaps a post in the All-Purpose Request thread would've been better?

Regardless, I've reopened the thread for now. Any further discussion on this should happen outside this thread.
 
Crabwhale said:
Uh, I may have been the one to close that. Either way, this would probably better be handled in another thread. It's not necessarily a strict rule violation. Perhaps a post in the All-Purpose Request thread would've been better?

Regardless, I've reopened the thread for now. Any further discussion on this should happen outside this thread.
Click to expand...
Also think that we should probably bring the old tiers back to hinata until a final decision is made
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

FinePoint
  • Locked
Discussion Rule Word Salad
Replies
22
Views
1K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Agnaa
Fanart Rule Revamp
Replies
7
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
FinePoint
  • Locked
Clarifying Death Threat Rules
2
Replies
64
Views
6K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Kachon123
One Piece: Planet Size Discussion Rule
Replies
14
Views
2K
RaikiKurohane99
RaikiKurohane99
FlipLaScript
Loosening Up Tier 1 Rules
2
Replies
44
Views
2K
Kanogami
Kanogami
Back
Top