• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Massive Source Downgrades (Maou Gakuin)

Status
Not open for further replies.
We're 4 pages into this thread and HGR wasn't even discussed until page 3-4. It would be easier to make a new thread recompiling the relevant information for the sake of understanding.


...Yeah, I said I would wait. But my patience isn't infinite, and I could apply the changes tonight if I wanted to. It has nothing to do with the thread dying.
There is no point in rushing it, Fuji?
 
Make a wiki revision if you want his vote to count
He is a content mod, simple as that. Their opinions should be taken to consideration but their votes do not count
They do not have voting rights, even he cannot say he does, so why are you dying on his hill?

In case you missed it
It is the responsibility of Thread Moderators, Administrators, and Bureaucrats to review and approve content revisions for the verses in this wiki
So to say the list, if you want him to have voting right make a CRT to add "content mods" to that list
 
Make a wiki revision if you want his vote to count
don't need it. Policies are clear as it is.
He is a content mod, simple as that. Their opinions should be taken to consideration but their votes do not count
Ya, and the policy above stated if they are expertise of the verse, then it needs to be carefully considered.
They do not have voting rights, even he cannot say he does, so why are you dying on his hill?
No one claimed. Go above and see what I shared.
In case you missed it

So to say the list, if you want him to have voting right make a CRT to add "content mods" to that list
In case you miss 3 policies where it makes his vote relevant in some factors.

Pain, you are talking with the one who created the polices. Drop it and move on, even OP don't want to rush it.
 
Taking advantage of that I returned to this topic.
First: Why is Maverick in agree? He said he's neutral and is inclined to agree, so his vote should be neutral.
Second: I disagree with everything - information manipulation, I am neutral on information manipulation, since I don't even know how it works the ability.
 
Last edited:
Well, I do have permission from Glass to apply the concept/info downgrades, so I guess I can do that now?
image.png
 
What???? Every damn thread I've seen that has people in neutral with leaning to X decision are listed on the neutral side, no one has been manipulative enough to put them on X side because they are still neutral. Hahahaha, imma have a private talk about this rn.
 
Neutral, leaning towards agreeing by basic grammar means you're actively neutral to what's being currently discussed, but between the binary of agree or disagree you're leaning towards agreeing.

Maverick's vote shouldn't be counted as agreeing until she actually gives a concrete position on agreeing or disagreeing, because her current position is objectively neutral.

It's 2 agrees, one disagree and one neutral.
 
Neutral, leaning towards agreeing by basic grammar means you're actively neutral to what's being currently discussed, but between the binary of agree or disagree you're leaning towards agreeing.

Maverick's vote shouldn't be counted as agreeing until she actually gives a concrete position on agreeing or disagreeing, because her current position is objectively neutral.

It's 2 agrees, one disagree and one neutral.
bunda
 
Neutral, leaning towards agreeing by basic grammar means you're actively neutral to what's being currently discussed, but between the binary of agree or disagree you're leaning towards agreeing.

Maverick's vote shouldn't be counted as agreeing until she actually gives a concrete position on agreeing or disagreeing, because her current position is objectively neutral.

It's 2 agrees, one disagree and one neutral.
Thanks for your input, I did not know a basic understanding needs this explanation.
 
I have the edits on the unlocked profiles ready to go, but before I pull the trigger I just wanna reaffirm that yes, a mod did give the okay to apply the edits, and yes, that is good enough, as regular members aren't able to make decisions like that (unfortunately). So I better not see any of this shit in the RVR, either for me or for Glassman.

If it does become an issue later on, the edits can be reverted.
 
Lmao, vote manipulation is really funny.

"He agrees, because if he didn't, he would have just said he's neutral"

I'm not sure if this is the dumbest or most nonsensical thing I've ever read.
 
Auto Memory Doll#0069 or is it Auto Memory Doll#6900?
If Glass wants to give out his Discord then he'll do so on his own. Giving out people's social media without their permission is uh, kinda ******.

Fuji, 3 staff inputs is needed. You can't apply anything.
Yeah, and we got that, and confirmation that it's okay to apply the edits. I'll start now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top