- 12,451
- 5,641
no just wait a bitYeah, and we got that, and confirmation that it's okay to apply the edits. I'll start now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no just wait a bitYeah, and we got that, and confirmation that it's okay to apply the edits. I'll start now.
"and most staff is on my side"Well, I do have permission from Glass to apply the concept/info downgrades, so I guess I can do that now?
The "most staff is on my side" bit was in reference to the Touhou thread, lol"and most staff is on my side"
Yes, No. You only have a single vote my friendly, don't try to manipulate the vote and people.
And why the F*CK are you commenting here?The "most staff is on my side" bit was in reference to the Touhou thread, lol
bro?And why the F*CK are you commenting here?
I'm not "acting stupid", I just didn't "ask normally", I'm not cussing you out, I just want to know why the hell you're commenting on another topic of another verse here.bro?
I was just giving more context to that screenshot because you misunderstood what I said. No need to act like an ass over me explaining something to you.
This has 0 meanings.@Dog3352 The DC heralds CRT where some of the people leaning into agreeing counts for one or the other would like to talk to you, but if you want me to get more staff I can get more to comment.
If there nothing more to the OP then it's type 3, but not because it doesn't have a past. A concept of an individual human will always just he Type 3. It's only Type 2 if its a broader concept like "humanity" or something along those lines.Can you guys give input on whether or not this is a type 3 concept
The last conversation of an entire review in CM was in this thread: https://vsbattles.com/threads/conceptual-manipulation-clarifications-revisions.128012/page-3If there nothing more to the OP then it's type 3, but not because it doesn't have a past. A concept of an individual human will always just he Type 3. It's only Type 2 if its a broader concept like "humanity" or something along those lines.
The second and third, it is said that a concept that has no specification (example in the conversation itself), is more likely to be a type 3 CM."So that we're clear: We agree that changing an abstraction in a fashion that affects reality is not Type 1 or 2, unless said abstraction has demonstrated being the fundamental source of a property?"
"Yeah sure, I guess."
"It would make it easier to classify cases where it is not very clear whether they are Type 1 or 2 concept manip, though. Not all fiction is very clear on the matter. Concepts (or other abstractions) frequently are manipulated without really explaining what their nature is in deta
This is literally a direct confirmation that the concept does not need to have universal scale in order to be CM type 1 or 2, saying that something like "universal AoE" is not necessary (making it very clear that universal AoE or universal scale is not required to be type 2 or 1)."What would your alternative suggestion regarding Type 3 be?"
"I still think about keeping type 3 for some kind of safe zone. For example, a character name Toujo Basara, he is said to have a conceptual attack, but nothing more than that; and Siren from Azur Lane, they said that they can control the very fundamental, concept part of the pocket dimension they create, but nothing more than that, and we can't just assume they automatically govern reality universally. Or Tobio from Highschool DxD, he can destroy the concept of magic."
"That's what I meant."
Extra proof: This confirmation has a link that goes straight to the revisions, in the penultimate and ante-penultimate changes (revisions), they take out words like "govern the universe" or "govern reality", taking out universal scales, and replacing them with words like "govern reality in all its area" or "govern reality in all area that the concept governs" (making it clear once again that you don't need universal AoE to be CM type 2 or 1).
I don't like the ""universal"" label. Its gives a strong impression that range/AoE is the prime factor in deciding the type of concept. I am sure we pretty much agreed that range/AoE is a complete non-factor in deciding the Type/Nature of Concept.
This is nothing more than AoE, it was already said in the last CRT review of CM that I don't need big AoE or something, but fundamentalism.If there nothing more to the OP then it's type 3, but not because it doesn't have a past. A concept of an individual human will always just he Type 3. It's only Type 2 if its a broader concept like "humanity" or something along those lines.
And then you realize that the change made was the one to the CRT that I posted.@Dog3352 You do realize ignoring the thread I posted where what the staff discussed about what the concepts are, something that's applied to the pages isn't helping you right?
The page itself states thisI said that what you need is "fundamentality" or "governing on basic fundamentals/minor concepts", and I'm going to prove that what I was saying was right.
And more importantly thisConcepts that don't meet the same standards as Type 1 or Type 2, such as personal concepts that continue to govern the object in question, merely on a more specific scale, or concepts whose nature is not elaborated upon.
A person's future being erased, but only that person and only in the present and not retroactively, is Type 3.These concepts shape everything, and changing them would either require the alteration of every object of the concept or, if manipulated directly, change all objects of the concept alongside the concept itself.
Lmao. See the changes.@Dog3352 And yet governing reality is still in the page, I wonder why, maybe because that's still what's needed for type 2 and 1 concepts.
Each concept is linked with its respective "object". In this way, altering the concept will change every object in the same way the concept itself was changed, effectively altering reality on a universal, if not higher, scale. |
Each concept is linked with its respective "object". In this way, altering the concept will change every object linked to it in the same way the concept itself was changed. |
'''1. Independent Universal Concepts:''' Such concepts are completely independent from the reality they govern. These concepts shape all of reality and whatever level that reality exists in, and everything in reality "participates" in these concepts. For example, a circular object is circular because it is "participating" in the form of "circle-ness". In this way, the alteration of these concepts will change every object of the concept across all of reality, while the opposite wouldn't affect the concept. |
'''1. Independent Universal Concepts:''' Such concepts are completely independent from the part of reality they govern. These concepts shape all of reality within their area of influence and at whatever level that area exists in, and everything in it "participates" in these concepts. For example, a circular object is circular because it is "participating" in the concept of "circle-ness". In this way, the alteration of these concepts will change every object of the concept across all of their area of influence, while the opposite wouldn't affect the concept. |
pos-review'''2. Dependent Concepts:''' Such concepts are abstract and govern all reality.
'''2. Dependent Concepts:''' Such concepts are abstract and govern all reality within their area of influence
No. No I am not
"governs all reality" to "All reality whitin THEIR AREA OF INFLUENCE"@Dog3352 You do realize you're shooting yourself in the foot the more and more you show me the page where it says shape all of reality right? Constantly showing me the page where it says what I've been saying throughout this thread isn't helping you.
Either way 3 staff members agreed with this thread, (or 3.5 if we're being semantic) so the changes can be applied.
I only agreed with the concept stuff. The regeneration still probably qualifies as High Godly and I don't know about information manipulation.Either way 3 staff members agreed with this thread
This is literally a direct confirmation that the concept does not need to have universal scale in order to be CM type 1 or 2, saying that something like "universal AoE" is not necessary (making it very clear that universal AoE or universal scale is not required to be type 2 or 1)."So that we're clear: We agree that changing an abstraction in a fashion that affects reality is not Type 1 or 2, unless said abstraction has demonstrated being the fundamental source of a property?"
"Yeah sure, I guess."
Each concept is linked with its respective "object". In this way, altering the concept will change every object in the same way the concept itself was changed, effectively altering reality on a universal, if not higher, scale. |
Each concept is linked with its respective "object". In this way, altering the concept will change every object linked to it in the same way the concept itself was changed. |
'''1. Independent Universal Concepts:''' Such concepts are completely independent from the reality they govern. These concepts shape all of reality and whatever level that reality exists in, and everything in reality "participates" in these concepts. For example, a circular object is circular because it is "participating" in the form of "circle-ness". In this way, the alteration of these concepts will change every object of the concept across all of reality, while the opposite wouldn't affect the concept. |
'''1. Independent Universal Concepts:''' Such concepts are completely independent from the part of reality they govern. These concepts shape all of reality within their area of influence and at whatever level that area exists in, and everything in it "participates" in these concepts. For example, a circular object is circular because it is "participating" in the concept of "circle-ness". In this way, the alteration of these concepts will change every object of the concept across all of their area of influence, while the opposite wouldn't affect the concept. |
pos-review'''2. Dependent Concepts:''' Such concepts are abstract and govern all reality.
The changes were made to make it clear that it no longer takes Universal AoE to be type 1 or 2...but you are simply too ignorant to even notice the obvious...'''2. Dependent Concepts:''' Such concepts are abstract and govern all reality within their area of influence
Now READ the difference between one explanation and the other.@Dog3352 that doesn't really change anything, Death governs all of reality within its area of influence, it still governs reality by default which makes it a type 2 concept.
Each concept is linked with its respective "object". In this way, altering the concept will change every object in the same way the concept itself was changed, effectively altering reality on a universal, if not higher, scale. |
Each concept is linked with its respective "object". In this way, altering the concept will change every object linked to it in the same way the concept itself was changed. |
'''1. Independent Universal Concepts:''' Such concepts are completely independent from the reality they govern. These concepts shape all of reality and whatever level that reality exists in, and everything in reality "participates" in these concepts. For example, a circular object is circular because it is "participating" in the form of "circle-ness". In this way, the alteration of these concepts will change every object of the concept across all of reality, while the opposite wouldn't affect the concept. |
'''1. Independent Universal Concepts:''' Such concepts are completely independent from the part of reality they govern. These concepts shape all of reality within their area of influence and at whatever level that area exists in, and everything in it "participates" in these concepts. For example, a circular object is circular because it is "participating" in the concept of "circle-ness". In this way, the alteration of these concepts will change every object of the concept across all of their area of influence, while the opposite wouldn't affect the concept. |
pos-review'''2. Dependent Concepts:''' Such concepts are abstract and govern all reality.
'''2. Dependent Concepts:''' Such concepts are abstract and govern all reality within their area of influence
From what I can see nothing Dog has said has real been hostile. Rhe ignorant thing seems to come more frustration than hostility.Turn down the hostility,
Thank you, and yes, and that.From what I can see nothing Dog has said has real been hostile. Rhe ignorant thing seems to come more frustration than hostility.
I would like you to please take a look at what I said above, and even (only if you want) could you go to the thread where I got these conversations from.From what I can see nothing Dog has said has real been hostile. Rhe ignorant thing seems to come more frustration than hostility.
You're just proving me right, and besides, most of your words are the same, saying I need to "govern all reality" or "govern the the universe".@Dog3352 You're not even reading what I'm arguing aren't you? Not even gonna bother entertain this argument if you will not pay attention to what I've said this entire thread.
Not only that part, he has actually been hostile towards Glass previously in the course of the thread, that was the third time so I had to call him out on thatFrom what I can see nothing Dog has said has real been hostile. Rhe ignorant thing seems to come more frustration than hostility.
Are you the administrator who cannot understand the obvious...? Lmao.
Seriously admin? Do I trim explanations to make it sound like I'm lying? fufufu what a low blow for an admin.
I went "hostile", because he was manipulating the text to look like something else, and it wasn't "hostility", I wanted an explanation of why he was doing this.Not only that part, he has actually been hostile towards Glass previously in the course of the thread, that was the third time so I had to call him out on that
I think you misunderstood my text, I said that these are the types of people I hate the most, not that you are that type of person.So you’re calling me an idiot now? Ok, good luck trying to convince me that your side is right if ad Hominem is your option against disagreements