- 14,991
- 10,603
I agree, he is being extremely immature here.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 18,393
- 14,332
I honestly would blame OP for creating a such nonsense CRT that it is obviously for wanking reasons.
Which makes fans angry as well, and well-provoking. This is not his first time doing it at all.
- 18,393
- 14,332
If the OP thread did not exist in the first place, the whole toxicity won't exist, as they are dependent on the OP thread's existence.
Also, this is not his first time doing a such nonsense thread. He was attempting to create low 1-A Minecraft, and obviously, he never read previously rejected threads for that. The same goes for MG and Pokémon. This is alone provoking in my perspective side.
The user above who got reported has no history of toxicity and kinda looks like he was under pressure saying those.
Anyways, I don't want to involve myself, but this is tiring that people create CRTs and never research on anything.
- 2,127
- 1,728
I guess he was responding Sniper670 and he also have a similar past record 
.
.
- 13,826
- 19,668
OP was troll smh it was all just a response from the arguments led by the OP, so the flood goes from there taking others together but keeping all this aside.
^These seems to be more of pointing towards arguementum infinitum rather than insult but the language was bit tough.
^seems insult but for ignoring the argument maybe but yet a insult.
- 13,826
- 19,668
Yes, I meant for other's on take. It tends to where it wasn't intended to, basically how it was perceived.
DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 18,639
- 16,185
I mean if someone makes a thread to particularly piss people off and people take the bait it's a " Fool me once: Joke's on you. Fool me twice: Joke's on me " scenario
though I suppose the joke will always be on the thread starter as well since they made the thread with malicious intent
I'm not a mod or anything but I just wanted to say that.
though I suppose the joke will always be on the thread starter as well since they made the thread with malicious intent
I'm not a mod or anything but I just wanted to say that.
- 18,393
- 14,332
No, more troll than clueless, you would figure this out if you read all his comments on the last page. Honestly, he is really provoking right now.
- 12,785
- 23,075
Can't you see? Your report already ended when Ant gave the warning to the user, now the OP of that same thread and is cursing the site, trolling and saying antics, so why not report him?
- 18,393
- 14,332
Agreed. He seems to be a troll and provoking person. Alone his messages proves this.
- 10,222
- 11,880
Didn't notice the report, my B.
- 12,785
- 23,075
- 5,313
- 2,014
If worst comes to worst, he will have been banned from doing CRTs in general for a time. I am of a opinion the OP need a warning and if he repeatingly does it, he get the ban from creating CRTs for some time.
- 177,947
- 90,978
- Thread starter
- #15,619
@Mr._Bambu @Celestial_Pegasus @Andytrenom @Wokistan @SomebodyData @Abstractions
Would any of you be willing to investigate please?
- 14,991
- 10,603
Im reporting @SparxGaming12 for constantly being a troll in this thread
saying stuff like:
" Literally no debunk + not even reading what i am saying : 
no i am too much ******** to read those high class things imma just spam that this crt should be closed and with appeal to popularity this crt will 100% closed"
and now hes just being a troll and calling people a nerd
"@Dread see people like you no debunk : * no i said everything and this crt should be close i dont care if this is debunkable or not , i hate Pokemon so much that no matter the evidence i still gonna spam this crt should be closed"
saying stuff like:
"
Literally no debunk + not even reading what i am saying : no i am too much ******** to read those high class things imma just spam that this crt should be closed and with appeal to popularity this crt will 100% closed"and now hes just being a troll and calling people a nerd
"@Dread see people like you
no debunk : * no i said everything and this crt should be close i dont care if this is debunkable or not , i hate Pokemon so much that no matter the evidence i still gonna spam this crt should be closed"
- 177,947
- 90,978
- Thread starter
- #15,621
Since he is a very new member who is self-admittedly just here to cause problems and derail, I personally don't mind if we permanently ban him.Im reporting @SparxGaming12 for constantly being a troll in this thread
saying stuff like:
"
and now hes just being a troll and calling people a nerd
"@Dread see people like you
- 14,991
- 10,603
yes PLEASE do
- 5,313
- 2,014
First things first, we should wait on other staff members.
Also, shouldn’t we make it a two years first before escalating it to permanent ban?
I get the trolling part, but I also ain’t completely convinced it shouldn’t been full on permanent ban.
- 177,947
- 90,978
- Thread starter
- #15,624
Im reporting @SparxGaming12 for constantly being a troll in this thread
saying stuff like:
"
and now hes just being a troll and calling people a nerd
"@Dread see people like you
@DarkDragonMedeus @AKM sama @Damage3245 @SamanPatou
What do you think about this?
- 12,785
- 23,075
He cursed the site, trolled, and insulted... Permaban is worth IMO.
- 177,947
- 90,978
- Thread starter
- #15,626
I permanently banned @SparxGaming12 for the time being to put a stop to his antics.
If other staff members here disagree, we can adjust the ban time later.
- 5,313
- 2,014
Hmmm, I suppose that is a fair point
- 34,606
- 35,060
I'm not objecting to their ban.
- 177,947
- 90,978
- Thread starter
- #15,630
Thank you for the reply.
I would appreciate input regarding the earlier mentioned issue as well.
I would appreciate input regarding the earlier mentioned issue as well.
- 13,880
- 22,738
Permanent ban seems fine by me. Seems like a troll
- 34,732
- 42,178
I suppose Spark could be a troll with things considered, but not against him showing up to message walls to ask about it. If he's polite there, I may consider shortening it.
- 177,947
- 90,978
- Thread starter
- #15,634
Okay, and what about the following issue?
- 34,732
- 42,178
I'm not sure what else needs to be dealt with if the OP was already banned and TioKill got his light warning already (Which he might have done out of stress rather than malicious intent based on things Dread pointed out).
TioKill
They/Them- 739
- 466
So let me get this straight -
- Person dedicates and provokes a debate on the OP's behalf
- Purposely Ad Infinitum everything I say, which is - to be tame - annoying at the very least.
- Replies to my annoyed comments with the exact same kind of toxicity:
- "YOU REPEAT THE EXACT SAME SHIT."
- "Completely unaffected by this. When you consider the fact that it's coming from a Clown"
- Even Sniper's personal supporter was saying toxic shit too: "Bro is an NPC", and yes, if we're considering me saying his points are dumb to be offensive, calling me an NPC to insult my intelligence is also offensive, it's either or none.
- And somehow only I get a warning?
Hilarious. I won't even waste time on reporting on someone else's behalf because of personal bias - that's another can of worms, but nah, you say that to HIM too, otherwise I refuse to acknowledge this warning. Btw, what's the situation with OP and the obvious instigating threads?
- 177,947
- 90,978
- Thread starter
- #15,638
The OP has been banned for trolling. I would appreciate if other staff members here investigate what you mentioned above though.
- 13,880
- 22,738
I'm gonna preface my response by saying that I don't think Sniper is off the hook at all, I think both Sniper and TioKill are in the wrong here.
You also questioned if Sniper had a disability out of personal annoyance with their arguments, that goes beyond the scope of what should be reasonable as an annoyed response.
I've noticed this in other threads you've been in as well, you need to stop getting so heated over fictional characters beating the crap out of each other. It's not that deep.
Edit: Yikes
I can understand being annoyed, that's fine, but looking at your responses in the thread, I think you took it too far.
For the first quote, it could also be said Sniper was saying that in response to your own offensive "I'm debating with a child" reply. And the second quote is in the same position, and it honestly doesn't even seem as bad compared to what it was replying to: you referring to them as a barely functional manchild. The NPC comment was unnecessary coming from another party though, yeah.
You also questioned if Sniper had a disability out of personal annoyance with their arguments, that goes beyond the scope of what should be reasonable as an annoyed response.
I've noticed this in other threads you've been in as well, you need to stop getting so heated over fictional characters beating the crap out of each other. It's not that deep.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but whether or not you acknowledge the warning doesn't actually mean anything
Edit: Yikes
