• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

King Tempest has not lied to my knowledge, do either of you have anything to back your claims?
The thread itself.
No staff responded at all afterwards when he said he would add it (AKA they didn't say to add it yet)
I responded to him and he responded then locked the thread before I had a chance to respond

I would be fine if he had something from those two staff that showed they wanted to add it at that point
 
King Tempest has not lied to my knowledge, do either of you have anything to back your claims?
I quoted myself saying "I'll add the upgrades" in the excerpt above, and @Saman agreed to those he had agreed to prior
Ok then, reactive or accelerated is good for Zoro
Attack reflection for Mihawk is fine, then.
I expected he would have since he would need evidence
 
I quoted myself saying "I'll add the upgrades" in the excerpt above, and @Saman agreed to those he had agreed to prior
So one staff and its not even a final confirmation to add it yet he just gave his approval for the time being and its fine just sounds like something he would say just incase no arguments against it were raised
 
Ok, I'll unlock the thread and ask for blatant typed out "I agree with the revisions" then since you're butthurt.
 
I'd advise against calling others butthurt, considering this is more a less a petty case of authorisation.

If the CRT itself is uncontroversial and is mostly uncontested towards the end it is usually fine to apply. A level of trust is placed in the OP to handle the changes with their own discretion and that should be it. If a counterargument happens after a concluded CRT or after changes are made, another CRT would have to be made before further changes to the page are made.
 
This user, added this without a CRT as "visual edit".

He doesn't seem to mean any harm, since he did actual visual edit on Reinhard's page and I reverted the addition anyway, but it would be cool to just let him know that adding more justifications like that would need a CRT.
 
By my experience, he is harmless, but you or somebody else can politely talk with him about it if you wish.
 
From what I heard, some of the recent Doom god tiers have been controversial, and Hell specifically used to be Low 1-C; though not anymore. But I have a feeling that locking Hell might be a safe bet.
 
I was just about to report that. I fixed the page after it happened and he kept doing it, so it's clearly a troll. I say nuke em.
 
2gk950.jpg

RIP Strmy
 
Back
Top