-
FragrantJaguar150 Viott FragrantJaguar150 wrote on Viott's profile.
Hello, I wanted to talk about two calcs for lookism (speed).
-I don't think we should be using superhuman speed for a person who has 0 narrative implications that he is that fast nor a feat. His whole character is based on fighting in the dark. I feel like Daniel started to move before the timeframe that the person measured. Daniel was himself shocked and didn't know what happened and that is also a reason why his body could have moved before the timeframe.
I have made a comment on the blog.
The main issue with it for me is how goo cuts the gun but the bullet falls to the floor losing all of it's motion instantly. Assuming the trigger was pulled at the time and even created a 'BAM' sound. Isn't it very strange for the bullet to not cover atleast some distance outside of the gun itself?
I also discovered that the whole argument goes out the window once we see that the bullet isn't even cut.
Either Goo cut the gun before the trigger was pulled ( BAM could be the sound of Goo cutting the gun) or strange lookism logic. I believe first point is more defendable rather then blaming the entire logic.
I wanted your say on the two stuff I covered. I also have issues with the Sinu blitzing fodder calculation as there is not much evidence that he hit them all in a single timeframe .
-I don't think we should be using superhuman speed for a person who has 0 narrative implications that he is that fast nor a feat. His whole character is based on fighting in the dark. I feel like Daniel started to move before the timeframe that the person measured. Daniel was himself shocked and didn't know what happened and that is also a reason why his body could have moved before the timeframe.
I have made a comment on the blog.
The main issue with it for me is how goo cuts the gun but the bullet falls to the floor losing all of it's motion instantly. Assuming the trigger was pulled at the time and even created a 'BAM' sound. Isn't it very strange for the bullet to not cover atleast some distance outside of the gun itself?
I also discovered that the whole argument goes out the window once we see that the bullet isn't even cut.
Either Goo cut the gun before the trigger was pulled ( BAM could be the sound of Goo cutting the gun) or strange lookism logic. I believe first point is more defendable rather then blaming the entire logic.
I wanted your say on the two stuff I covered. I also have issues with the Sinu blitzing fodder calculation as there is not much evidence that he hit them all in a single timeframe .
