• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Elizio

Pls take a look at this thread on DC upgrade for new 52 continuity to get high 3A rating🙏

Care to check this threath please?
Care to check this threath please?
Care to check this threath please?
Do you mind taking a look at this thread?
Hello. I once saw a CGM mention that if the depth of a crater cannot be determined directly from the image, it can instead be estimated as 1/4 of the crater’s diameter.

Do you happen to have a source or reference for this 1/4 value? I am quite interested in obtaining the original reference for it.

The reason I am not asking Drite directly is because he is currently not in a very good situation, so I do not really want to bother him too m
uch.
TheRustyOne
TheRustyOne
I have no idea.

I've never done that because I don't know the source, either.
Hello. I once saw a CGM mention that if the depth of a crater cannot be determined directly from the image, it can instead be estimated as 1/4 of the crater’s diameter.

Do you happen to have a source or reference for this 1/4 value? I am quite interested in obtaining the original reference for it.

The reason I am not asking Drite directly is because he is currently not in a very good situation, so I do not really want to bother him too m
uch.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
I have no idea where that might have originally come from. I have seen the idea floated, and accepted, but never sourced. Sorry.
Pxnd_013
Pxnd_013
No problem, thanks for the answer 🙏
Hello. I once saw a CGM mention that if the depth of a crater cannot be determined directly from the image, it can instead be estimated as 1/4 of the crater’s diameter.

Do you happen to have a source or reference for this 1/4 value? I am quite interested in obtaining the original reference for it.

The reason I am not asking Drite directly is because he is currently not in a very good situation, so I do not really want to bother him too m
uch.
Hello!

Would you mind evaluating this thread? Since you helped with the last major Murder Drones CRT. (Needs one more vote to pass)

Every major point that has been contested:
Hello, would you be able to look at this lookism AP revision/downgrade

While I'm not caring about most of the other calculations, one of the brought up points was the usage of depth-to-diameter ratios typically from meteor impacts on the moon. I wanted to see what a CGM's opinion on this would be.
Hello, would you be able to look at this lookism AP revision/downgrade

While I'm not caring about most of the other calculations, one of the brought up points was the usage of depth-to-diameter ratios typically from meteor impacts on the moon. I wanted to see what a CGM's opinion on this would be.
Hello, would you be able to look at this lookism AP revision/downgrade

While I'm not caring about most of the other calculations, one of the brought up points was the usage of depth-to-diameter ratios typically from meteor impacts on the moon. I wanted to see what a CGM's opinion on this would be.
Vietthai i have a question


IMG-8472.jpg


In my thread you said this but the OP actually goes against this as applicable and it wasnt agreed upon yet it was still applied to the profile. Is it still applicable even though the OP goes against this and other staff didnt agree to this?
Mbpoops
Mbpoops
Vietthai96
Vietthai96
So anyway, you can ask on All-purpose request about this situation for the ability removal, write the reason why it should be removed, or make a thread to address the ability
Mbpoops
Mbpoops
alright thank you
Can we bring back cm1?
We know that gods are eternal and never die, and that their effects on the body will not affect any concepts.

They were only possessing temporary vessels anyway, so no matter what happened to the vessel itself, it wouldn't affect their existence as gods in the slightest

The complete slaying of a god is the destruction of the very concept of existence.
“Oh? I see you have changed your approach. You are now attempting to kill the very concept of my being. Of course, killing this vessel means little,so that is the correct path to take, but is it something you are capable of?
Underhanded tactics like killing the concept of a person only works if you
alone are capable of doing it
Even eliminating their existence is not enough to completely kill the god.
“I told you from the beginning I intended to kill you. All that remained
was to see how much of a fight you put up. If you had fought until the end, I
would have at least asked your name. Die.”
Having lost interest, she killed the man, erasing his existence. At the same
The UEG had never considered that. She had believed gods were
indestructible, eternal beings. She had killed any number of gods, but death
was just another state of being for them, one from which they would
eventually recover.
UEG killed many gods, but those gods didn't die completely. Because of this, a powerful attack like erasing their existence wasn't enough to kill a god completely, and it didn't affect their concepts; it only affected the object of their concepts.

The gods can kill the concept of a person's existence, and the yogurt that destroyed that concept should be returned. Concept mani type1 ?

What do you think?
Hello. Sorry to bother but I have a thread going on and obviously staff is needed.


This thread (fortunately not too long to read for verifying) is going back and forth in just one argument going deep about Enhanced Senses, could i please ask for an input of yours in it?
SomebodyData
SomebodyData
Looks like First Witch handled it, but feel free to let me know if something else arises!
Nonynho
Nonynho
Tell me if i can have a tad bit more of your time, please!

This thread (fortunately not too long to read for verifying) is going back and forth in just one argument going deep about Enhanced Senses, could i please ask for an input of yours in it?
Nonynho
Nonynho
Not to be a bother, but the question is basically if certain character's description of Enhanced Senses say "his senses are tens of times better than a regular human and his vision acuity dozens of times better" = he's most likely able to passively view someone from SBA's top starting distance
Hello, mind check this CRT? He's already 1 month old
Hey, Bambu. I'd appreciate your input here. It's not really a CRT, so there's nothing to approve.

Can you please give your opinion on my thread I need one more staff member.


This thread (fortunately not too long to read for verifying) is going back and forth in just one argument going deep about Enhanced Senses, could i please ask for an input of yours in it?
Armorchompy
Armorchompy
My gut instinct would be "no" because the Earth just curves to the point of you not being able to see them, visibility itself isn't really the problem.
Nonynho
Nonynho
Well, this always was clearly a mismatch

I can't know who would be the most "countable" as winner as either shortening the distance makes this one-sided towards side A and leaving as is makes this one-sided towards side B
Armorchompy
Armorchompy
high hax battles often be like that

This thread (fortunately not too long to read for verifying) is going back and forth in just one argument going deep about Enhanced Senses, could i please ask for an input of yours in it?
Twilight can you check out this short crt please. It has 2 staff votes and only needs 1 more 🙏
Could you see this?
I'd appreciate if you take a look at my thread.

Can you truly be a harem king if you're a part of mine?
  • Like
Reactions: Grabbing_dragon
Grabbing_dragon
Grabbing_dragon
Yes, I can still be one, because the lover part in romance goes both ways, i.e., he is hers and she is his, so they belong to each other. So, I can still be part of a harem and truly be a harem king.
Grabbing_dragon
Grabbing_dragon
Man, it sucks that there aren’t many harems where the girls are not only in a romantic relationship with the MC but also with each other, because that’s what I see as a complete harem.
Can help evaluate this CRT?
SomebodyData
SomebodyData
Sorry, looks like I wasn't able to comment in time!
Back
Top