• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

What's new Featured content New posts New media New media comments New profile posts Latest activity
RandomGuy2345
Yo! Remember me?

I know you're not really a staff member, but can you give your input on this thread if you can?
Renitr
View previous comments…
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
No, the stone cross. Using that method for the destruction of the stone cross snapping yields very high-end 9-C+. However, I'm trying to reach out to Ugarik about whether there's an even better method of approaching it, since this one is imperfect in one aspect.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Then again, who knows. Maybe it does make sense and maybe this is where it fits, even though I earnestly thought it was a 9-B feat. Martial artists and shit cleave rock in half sometimes. Maybe because of the specific method of destruction, this tracks. Either way. The calc is here.
Renitr
Renitr
Considering the hard sh*t that's going on with TWD and it feats right now, I'll be happy to even have a legal high end of 9-C. Anyway, thank you for your work and for the fact that you decided to spend your time on this. I'll try to find this fight scene or backstage photo in behind the scenes, maybe I'll be lucky to find better pictures of cross. But most likely I won't succeed because twd has always had less behind the scenes, and even more so now it's difficult to find behind the scenes for a recent and new project. Still, I think we'll see 9-B twd soon. As the action gets more absurd with each new season, and characters look more and more like superheroes in action movies (Unless, of course, there are not anti-feats)
Astral_Trinity439
Hi, Ultima
Some questions:
Premise: If let's say in a verse, there is a system governing all reality level, non 1-A and 1-A ones included.

Q1: If a being from a lower reality is able to ascend to a higher reality via reincarnation or via transmigration because the system itself intervenes each time to reconstruct the form of said being from non 1-A to the same nature as the 1-A composite in question, is such an ascension valid and not anti feat as a higher power is involved directly?

Q2: If a 1-A being can "enter" a lower reality via manifesting in a body (created by the system or by themselves) that is of the same qualitative nature/composite as the lower reality, such a feat is valid because the characters are not entering the non 1A reality in their true form/1A form, right?
Pedonar
Could you please evaluate this? We’ve been waiting since July for someone to review it, but so far, only Bambu has left a single comment and hasn’t followed up. We’re almost finished with the profile, and this is one of the last things we need to address
PHANtomFELdway
Hello phoenks

So I am thinking of making a tier upgrade for solo leveling.



While I will just use solo leveling and not ragnorock (for now) I wonder if it is fine to use solo leveling ragnorock as additional proof for something already stated in solo leveling.



For example. If solo leveling says that gates are doorways to other dimensions. And that dungeons themselves are dimensions. Would it be fine to use solo leveling ragnorock to show that it isn’t a one time statement? (Also since the absolute being created numerous/countless universes with (high ranking) dungeons being actual different universes. Would you still disagree with him scaling to low multi-multi. (I am not basing it off dungeons btw. Just additional evidence)

I am basing it off the fact that numerous universes exist inside one world (won’t even use the fact that the absolute being created multiple worlds)



I asked a translator already. And besides it saying numerous,it is the correct translation
View previous comments…
PHANtomFELdway
PHANtomFELdway
Bump
Phoenks
Phoenks
Where is it said that the absolute being created all of those.

Also, Creation doesn't necessarily mean absolute being scales physically. Especially cause of anti feats.
PHANtomFELdway
PHANtomFELdway
It would be more difficult to prove he didn’t make them. The context was literally talking about the world that the absolute being created and how they were finding a new place to make thier target.also if he didn’t create it,then it would have had to be a world created by another absolute being and where apostles lived (which clearly is not the case.someone had to create them since creation was made from a time where nothing existed/a void. Also there are no anti feats. Even ignoring the fact that him dying isn’t a problem,it is explained in ragnorock that the absolute being literally split his power when making the rulers and monarchs. In fact it is what every absolute being does. Monarchs are = to the absolute being in strength cause absolute being is nerfed (he created countless universes while nerfed)
Pedonar
Could you please evaluate this? We’ve been waiting since July for someone to review it, but so far, only Bambu has left a single comment and hasn’t followed up. We’re almost finished with the profile, and this is one of the last things we need to address
Back
Top