• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Take a look. Very short. Its a sort of retro game.

Hi, we need at least 1 more vote for this. Can you give your input please?
Hello Bambu, sorry to bother you again.
I have a small question about KE.
For some reason a member here stated that the calculation was invalid due to destruction not being equal to KE. (this rule does not exist on the KE page either).

But earlier here, he accepts a calculation where no destruction occurred, and putting in a blast site the yield, it should have destroyed an area 60 meters in diameter...

He previously also accepted a mountain level calculation without showing comparable destruction, I don't understand, if you need a destruction equal to KE, shouldn't we calculate the destruction instead?

By the way, if you could evaluate the calculation, I would really appreciate it 🙏🏻
Volt12121
Volt12121
Yeah sure why not
H3110l12345I20
H3110l12345I20
Here's the match. I hope it's fair. Btw can you link me to Juila Lawson's story? It sound pretty good to read.
Volt12121
Volt12121
There's actually no links for it XP

it's just a bunch of notes and ideas combined together, the plot is pretty much entirely in my head XP
Hi Firestorm can you give me your opinion on this if it is enough to be proof of CM Type 2.
Mana is a concept of the hidden mystic life energy that permeates all of nature:
Alpha Rune in the verse act as a source and embodiment of legerdomain as Charmcaster says, 'It is an object as old as time itself, through which all magic flows. It is the keeper of the true name of my realm; source of ultimate power! And it is mine!', and this is the secret true name of magic is known as 'Alpha Rune' in the show. The shifting of Alpha Rune causes something, as show, without Alpha Rune, Legerdomain began to destroying. Celestialsapiens shifting mana so they can manipulate him, poses a change in nature and everything, causing the entire universe to be changed. Verdona describes mana are life-energy that is present in all known living things, and that mana can never be fully absorbed. In Conclusion, Mana is a concept of life-energy are always in everything and are fundamental to the universe, shifting mana could cause the total changing of the entire universe, Paradox should get Conceptual Manipulation due to being able to created Alpha Rune (the embodiment of concept of mana), and also Charmcaster with Alpha Rune should get Concept Manip type 2 due to can control the nature of mana. So it should look
somthing like this
Professor Paradox:
Conceptual Manipulation (Type 2 - Created Alpha Rune, which is embodiment of mana, which acts as a force over universe, causing their changing entire universe if shifted)
Charmcaster with Alpha Rune:
REX9097
REX9097
Anodite and Legerdomain are made of mana, and the reason for their change is a change in Universe because they are interconnected, change the universe causes changing the nature of the mana.
Firestorm808
Firestorm808
That's not what conceptual manipulation is.
REX9097
REX9097
Mana is dependent on the universe/universe is dependent on the Mana, so is 'Dependent Concepts'
Dependent Concepts: Such concepts are abstract and govern all reality within their area of influence. These concepts shape everything, and changing them would either require the alteration of every object of the concept or, if manipulated directly, change all objects of the concept alongside the concept itself. These concepts, however, exist simultaneously with and are bound by the object of the concept. In this way, an abstract dependent concept can be destroyed by destroying all objects of the concept, restored by re-making an object of a previously existent concept, or changed by changing all objects of the concept across reality. This, however, does not qualify for this form of conceptual manipulation, and is rather treated as a by-product of another action akin to a "domino effect".
can u give ur input

Sorry for the inconvenience, could you please review this?

Would you check this out if I gave a summary outlining the main points of the proposal? I need 2 more staff to give this a look.

Hey Bambu,
I know you’re probably busy, but when you have the time, I would really appreciate it if you could provide some input here so we can continue the discussion regarding my calcs.
Thanks : )
Hello! I had a question, and I honestly do not know who to ask. Can you answer this question from me in this thread? Basically about whether the things there qualify for conceptual manipulation.
Hello, Bambu! I hope I’m not bothering you. If it’s not too much trouble, could you take a look at this CRT?
Can I get your vote for a DC Thread?
Can u check this DC Thread?
Hi, I really apologize if I am bothering you, but if you have time could you check out this thread? Ultima already agreed, even saying that it is "super straightforward", all it needs now is a bit more staff inputs. Thanks in advance and I hope you have a nice day!
Hi, could you please check out this CRT?
would you mind reviewing this when you have time
Back
Top