VS Battles Wiki Forum

This is a rule on the Kinetic Energy Feats page.

There is a destruction/AP calculation contradicting a kinetic energy calculation. The destruction/AP calculation would take priority over the kinetic energy calculation in this case as the AP calculation would be a better proof in regards to how much damage he/she is capable of in an attack.

• For example, if a character launches a 200kg metal ball against a common wall at Mach 300, but the wall remains largely undamaged, the energy required to cause the minor damage on the wall would take priority over the kinetic energy derived from speed in this case.
• Keep in mind that this destruction should be compared to the energy lost by the object during the event. A ball travelling at relativistic speeds creating a hole its size, and continuing to move at nearly the same speed afterwards, would not be considered a contradiction. While a similar feat, with the ball falling to the ground a few meters afterwards, would be cause for concern.

Click to expand...

It is not so much that destruction must match KE- it is that in instances where both occur, if they are heavily inconsistent, we will prioritize destruction over kinetic energy.

"This isn't valid via our KE rules and the guts calc shouldn't work either since it doesn't showcase any equivalent destruction"

The "equivalent of destruction" does not exist, but then? The calculation is refused on your part?
It's as if he wanted to equalize the energy between both in destruction, which doesn't happen in any of the examples shown in the blog comment and the one shown in the previous comment (of your profile).

By the way, thanks for the help, I don't think we should prioritize destruction here, the Nichirins had no problem cutting the bombs...

No, I haven't really looked at that other one, I thought you just wanted to know about the rule. I haven't been on much today, I'll try to get to going over it.

I had read this rule before asking you, I put it on the blog before he evaluated it, but he ignored my arguments and simply added a rule that doesn't exist. Well, when you can, I would really appreciate it if you took a look to see if it really breaks any rules, this member has unfortunately done this again before (but again with superficial arguments), I'm just asking other members to evaluate it to make sure

I've replied to it; I think the calc is wrong for, funnily enough, an entirely separate reason. That said, it is my impression that it is borderline but probably usable for KE. If I may ask, what tier are the characters currently rated at?

I understand, I will try to find another time to estimate the thickness properly, although it is very difficult.
Thank you very much for your opinion, by the way, does only one sword work? Or should we use both?

About Tier, We have a city block level+ with a drug of 700× of a common dose of onii, We have the one from Nakime that is a block accepted by you, and we are looking for a multi city block so we can upgrade top Tiers to Large Town level.

This being perhaps a strong contender for such an event.

By the way, do you think this calculation works? On his page you can see he has electricity manipulation, But do you think vaporization should work?

Bump (redone)

Bump

Bump

Bump