• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Hi Bambu. I proposed another major LotR revision. I'd really appreciate the feedback.


I also responded to your post on the Calc regarding the Storm made by Gandalf and Durin.
Hey, I'm in need of votes so check dis out.

Ar1216789
Ar1216789
Can you tell me your opinion on the thread after my response or are you remaining neutral?
TISSG7Redgrave
TISSG7Redgrave
Honestly I'm staying neutral. Idk too much but I think a void of nothingness doesn't mean much and transcend all needs some elaboration in factors what concepts exist and such.
Ar1216789
Ar1216789
A void of nothingness is where the scale is contingent to Outerverse level.

Given that I provided a buttload of evidence of how the land is rid of things of the lower existence and is "disconnected from mundane reality" and "transcended all".

Mystic Flour mentioned erasing thoughts, which are abstract concepts.

Given that the realm is nothingness and is rid of absolutely everything, and is superior, I think 1-A is applicable. Mystic Flour mentions "to show the Cookies of this world a land where nothing exists."

As a default, statements of being "above dimensions" are set at Low 1-A, and the same is applied to statements indicating superiority over "All of space and time," and similar. However, if they are applied to realms that can be inferred to surpass the very composition of the lower reality (e.g. Realms that are, themselves, non-composite, such as conceptual domains, or often, voids of nothingness), then 1-A is the most appropriate rating for them.
Can you please comment on this?
Can you please check this CRT?
Can you please comment on this?
Hello, can I get your vote in this thread? Thanks in advance.
Hello, can I get your vote in this thread? Thanks in advance.
Hello, can I get your vote in this thread? Thanks in advance.
Here you go, this helpful fellow compiled the fanbook into imgur in the Mashle thread. Just scroll down a bit all you'll see it all split up.
Thanks a lot for offering help when you're able to get to it.
this question isn't really for any verse on the wiki nor for any CRTs but wouldn't MWI explicitly working on a non collapsing wave function make the multiverse low 1-C since all possible outcomes of a quantum event would exist?
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
Of the three or four MWI ends you can get, that is the Low 1-C option. Since you'd get an uncountable infinite state of universes.
Hello, could you take input to here or ping other staffs? Thanks, have a nice day.

Is it fine if I make a seperate thread discussing antifeats that put 1-A into the question, let alone 0?The main thread should be locked until these issues are resolved, as theres quite a few
2 big examples being the root being a “periphery” of the nasuverse, and angra making a pathway to it connected by spatial axes

(sent this on discord, but no reply)
Please could finish This thread to give your input?

We really only need one or two more staff approvals and it seems like your already agree.
Mind looking at this berserk CRT?
Hi, can you evaluate this two thread please?
Hello! Can you please give your input on this thread? Thank you!

Can you unlock this profile so I can apply these revisions?
Can you please take a look at this CRT? staff input is needed. And thanks in advance.
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
I have work to do. When I'm free with that I'll try and dedicate enough time to comment in the thread.
YmTheSuper
YmTheSuper
Thanks
Back
Top