• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Regarding the existence of Composite human: Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
31,701
Reaction score
5,478
Previous Thread

Discuss the viability of CH's existence here

Agreed: Jackythejack, Junkoposter, Paul Frank, Monarch Laciel, CinnabarManx421, Buttersamuri, Hellbeast, The Pen and the Sword, Andytrenom, HeadlessKramerGeoff, Saikou the Lewd King, Antvasima, Apex PredatorX, Nemo212, Paulo.junior.969, Elizhaa, Dragonmasterxyz, DarkDragonMedeus, GoCommitDi, KLOL506

Disagreed: Wokistan, The Wright Way(?), Iamunanimousinthat(?), Lsirlancelotdulaci, Uninown, Moritzva, Redacted Flinn, DMB 1, I'm Blue daba dee daba die, TriforcePower1, N Kardashev, GojiBoyForever, Yellowpig10, MrDrProfessorPatricio

Neutral: I'm blue daba dee daba die, ThePerpetual, Sir Ovens, Colonel Krukov, Stalker Maggot
 
The vote count might be missing a few, because there were too many comments on the last thread, and I just went through it really fast, so I might have missed some.
 
"At some point. I have an SAT retake Saturday and several tests tomorrow. Might be able to Saturday but anything prior would just be rudimentary. You can send this there if you want"

Wok on when he will be able to respond
 
>composite wiki

>wiki's strongest, including VSBW and FCOC profiles

>still just EWTRTW
 
Would a Composite Wiki just be the same as this one except very single character has to be a composite of every version? That would be the best way to waste my time ever, plz do that.
 
Just make it a blog on here and put this shit to bed. God. Why is that not the first option? Is there a rule to blogposts too?
 
I disagree with CH being removed as well. The CH, for one, can still fight, especially if his/her personality has been merged with serial killers and terrorists, so that means he/she would have natural bloodlust. He/she would also have the experience of many military people who were in wars.
 
Psychomaster35 said:
I disagree with CH being removed as well. The CH, for one, can still fight, especially if his/her personality has been merged with serial killers and terrorists, so that means he/she would have natural bloodlust. He/she would also have the experience of many military people who were in wars.
Isn't this a extreme non-sequitur?
 
CH being able to fight actually doesn't have that much to do with the reasons for deletion; the deletion is because Real Life Composites aren't allowed, whether they're functional or not, with most o the reasons for their deletion also applying to CH. And even if it did have to do with how useful he is in a fight, there's still the points brought up in the last thread about many of his characteristics contradicting each other.
 
I´ll just say that I always wanted CH deleted for the standard breaking, and I still do, so in other words, I agree with CH being nuked for all the reasons that have been mentioned until now.
 
about me forcing the thread to wait: I have the SAT to retake on Saturday, and several tests for tomorrow. Due to that I'm not doing anything that takes me more than like a few minutes to do at a time here until that stuff is done. Might be able to comment by Saturday, if I'm still out by Monday you can prob just stop waiting for me
 
Yeah, that is true. For example, Psychomaster35 voted for CH to stay, but the reasoning he gave was "CH can still fight", which really doesn't have that much to do with most of the reasonings for deletion.
 
That doesn't really matter. If someone said "I think CH should stay because potato", we wouldn't count that just because "it's still a vote". The reasoning behind the vote has to make sense. Heck, there are even people saying "for reasons above" when there are no reasons above.
 
Paulo.junior.969 said:
That doesn't really matter. If someone said "I think CH should stay because potato", we wouldn't count that just because "it's still a vote". The reasoning behind the vote has to make sense. Heck, there are even people saying "for reasons above" when there are no reasons above.
Using gibberish as a reasoning isn't the same as a faulty argument.

Um, people on the last thread voted FRA due to mine,Gojobois, Yellow Pigs, Moritvasz, arguments. If we count it based off votes with proper reasoning, then many of the votes for axing him would have to be cut
 
Gibberish and faulty argument are both worthless. You need a good argument for the vote to count.

I'm not talking about the last thread, I'm talking about this one. Go ahead and cut the votes for axing him that do not have proper reasoning, if the reasoning is faulty, they shouldn't be there either. The only votes that count are the ones with actually good reasoning, regardless of what side they're voting for.
 
Either way, the main reasoning for deletion is that CH breaks the rules in the same way the other Real Life Composites did, and that many of the reasons for their deletion also apply to CH, with the only thing that prevented him from being deleted along with them being his popularity, with popularity being agreed by most to not be a valid reason.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top