• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Homura! I've come to bargain!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Schnee_One

VS Battles
Retired
Messages
63,529
Reaction score
8,507
Thanks to all of the immense MM spam, I never got the chance to make this match which, I've wanted to make for over a year.

And I had the sudden urge to make this despite Kal being gone so let's get this done.

Now, this is Pre Infinity War Strange, and before I get the "But he's High 7A" The dude has 9C Durability, so Homura one shots of she hits him (As he does have shields)

Of course, this is Magical Girl Homura.

Homura Akemi:

Doctor Strange: 6
 
A couple questions

1. Why not Homura?

2. Two pragmatic Time Based protagonists
 
ApiesDeathbyLazors said:
Wouldn't she just be looped back in? I mean Strange managed to loop something timeless.
Homura would be on different timeline tho after she time travel.

Unless Strange can affect Immeasurable speed.
 
ZeroTwo64 said:
We don't know if the time stone grants Strange resistance to Time Stop.
It doesn't, he has resistance by other means

By the way, pretty sure paradoxing a different character from another timeline is both not a win condition and ridiculously OOC for Homura.
 
I don't recall Homura defeating her enemies by paradoxing, so I'll agree with Gar that it's OOC for her to do so.
 
Well, Homura's hax isn't very useful here, but Strange can't do much either. I vote Inconclusive.
 
Homura has resistance to magic, soul manipulation and time manipulation. What can Strange do to her?
 
Hit her, as he's 5A.

Time Stop her, as no, she's not resistant.

BFR her.

But on the other hand.

Homura wins with literally any attack that hits his body without shields

BFR

2A absorbtion.
 
Homura's absorption is better against 2-A characters because she can absorb more power from them. It isn't very useful against a 5-A character.
 
That is literally one of the silliest things I have read in a debate

You are literally saying something that WORKS On a 2A scale won't work on a 5A with zero resistance.
 
Her power absorption worked only because Madoka didn't expect Homura's treason, but that was the only time she used it. I mean, she could have used it against Walpurgisnacht or Mami, who are much weaker than Madoka, but she didn't. Homura tainted her soul gem with her feelings towards Madoka, and that was the only reason the attack worked.
 
She didn't know her power absorbtion would even work on Wahl, so that's not going to fly.

Two, she couldn't use power absorbtion on Mami even if she tried, considering how outclassed she is in that matchup
 
This isn't a good explanation too. Nothing implied Homura didn't know her power absorption.

Yes, of course she is outclassed against a 7-A character and not against a 2-A.

Homura was able to able to steal Madoka's powers because her soul gem was already tainted with Love towards Madoka. The soul gem was full of it, and the absorption released all of Homura's emotions across the universe, thus rewroting it. Devil Homura told Kyubey that it was her love for Madoka the cause of the tainting of her soul gem, not the curse.
 
<Nothing implied it

<Burden of proof Fallacy

<Literally found out about it in Rebellion.
 
<Fallacy

<Homura fought on peer with Mami, she isn't outclassed at all.

<Nothing implied it
 
RebubleUselet said:
Aren't MG Homura and Rebellion Homura different versions of herself?
They are the same version, but Homura is half a magical girl and half a witch in Rebellion due to Incubators'isolation field.
 
ZeroTwo64 said:
<Fallacy

<Homura fought on peer with Mami, she isn't outclassed at all.

<Nothing implied it
<Homura

<On par with Mami

Homura, throughout the countless timelines in the series, tried and failed to defeat Mami on every single occasion, she knew more about Mami's equipment then Mami herself, so yes, she's completely outclassed against Mami

Is there a reason for why you cited fallacy and nothing implied it?

She never got the chance too and she didn't even know she had it, quit it with derailing.
 
Because you said that Homura didn't know she can use it against Walpurgisnacht, then I said nothing implied Homura didn't know her power absorption and you said nothing implied it, meaning Homura didn't know to have power absorption, and thus it is a paradox. Because if you say nothing implied it to a phrase where I already said nothing implied it, this is a fallacy.
 
If she was completely outclassed by Mami, they wouldn't have fought for so long, and the fact that she knew Mami's weapons doesn't mean she was outclassed by her, because they still had a long fight.
 
ZeroTwo64 said:
If she was completely outclassed by Mami, they wouldn't have fought for so long, and the fact that she knew Mami's weapons doesn't mean she was outclassed by her, because they still had a long fight.
Homura was going for the Kill, Mami wasn't.

Homura had years of knowledge worth on Mami, Mami couldn't say the same.

Homura still loses countless times against her.

Fighting for a period of time but never getting a hit and losing after your 100th attempt is "Outclassed" to the most obvious degree.
 
ZeroTwo64 said:
Because you said that Homura didn't know she can use it against Walpurgisnacht, then I said nothing implied Homura didn't know her power absorption and you said nothing implied it, meaning Homura didn't know to have power absorption, and thus it is a paradox. Because if you say nothing implied it to a phrase where I already said nothing implied it, this is a fallacy.
No.

You said nothing implied it, not me, you.

You were the one that assumed nothing implied it, and I said in Rebellion she found out about her absorbtion (It was actually the Wraith Arc so....)

I didn't paradox anything, as I wasn't the one who said nothing implied it, I went against your claim that you did.

Quit derailing and Drop it
 
Mami was about to shoot Homura in the head, so I don't think she wasn't going for the kill.
 
ZeroTwo64 said:
Mami was about to shoot Homura in the head, so I don't think she wasn't going for the kill.
Never did, and she binded her.

Homura was going for the Kill until after she time stopped and decided to go for the leg
 
No.

You said nothing implied it, not me, you.

You were the one that assumed nothing implied it, and I said in Rebellion she found out about her absorbtion (It was actually the Wraith Arc so....)

I didn't paradox anything, as I wasn't the one who said nothing implied it, I went against your claim that you did.

Quit derailing and Drop it

First of all, use a better tone when you talk and then you can't go by hypotesis by saying she didn't know her power absorption. I don't want to talk anymore with someone who use this tone and doesn't listen other's explanation.
 
I never hypothesized, and I told you to drop it, and you didn't, and you were derailing, and yet you kept going.

You were the one who said nothing implied it, not me, if you're going to leave and say no one listiened to you, that's on you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top