Spino vs Trike (2 more votes)

Hyper_Anon · Mar 17, 2018

It's a peaceful day in the dinosaur zoo. Until a Spinosaurus breaks out. It see a Triceratops and attacks it.
Both are in "character"?

The fight starts off in a lake, they start off in 5 foot deep water, but the Spino can pull the trike deeper underwater.

Kiryu2012 · Mar 17, 2018

There is simply no way for the Spinosaurus to win. The Triceratops is capable of fending off the far more dangerous Tyrannosaurus, and the Spinosaurus' specializations make it unsuited to stand a chance against anything as big and well-armed as a Triceratops. The ceratopsian stomps.

Hyper_Anon · Mar 17, 2018

Spino:0

Trike: 1

But what about the Spino being possibly bigger? And it's having more useful arms than T-rex. I wouldn't say it's a stomp, but Triceratops CAN win.

Kiryu2012 · Mar 17, 2018

Hyper Anon said:
Spino:0
Trike: 1

But what about the Spino being possibly bigger? And it's having more useful arms than T-rex. I wouldn't say it's a stomp, but Triceratops CAN win.

Size doesn't always matter, especially when you don't have the weapons to help. The Spino's arms are going to accomplish nothing; they're nowhere near as deadly as a Tyrannosaurus' jaws, and they're not designed to take on large armed dinosaurs. There really isn't anything the Spino can do to win.

Hyper_Anon · Mar 17, 2018

Kiryu2012 said:
Hyper Anon said:

Spino:0
Trike: 1

But what about the Spino being possibly bigger? And it's having more useful arms than T-rex. I wouldn't say it's a stomp, but Triceratops CAN win.

Click to expand...

Size doesn't always matter, especially when you don't have the weapons to help. The Spino's arms are going to accomplish nothing; they're nowhere near as deadly as a Tyrannosaurus' jaws, and they're not designed to take on large armed dinosaurs. There really isn't anything the Spino can do to win.

I guess the Spinosaurus is more aggressive via being a carnivore? And it can grip the Triceratops with it's longer arms, or use it's weight to crush the trike? Also don't T-rexes hunt Triceratops on the regular? Although maybe this fight wasn't as close as I thought. I thought the Spino could rip apart the Trike's spine with it's claws. Maybe there's someone else who could convince me that the Spino wins.

Kiryu2012 · Mar 17, 2018

Hyper Anon said:
Kiryu2012 said:

Hyper Anon said:

Spino:0
Trike: 1

But what about the Spino being possibly bigger? And it's having more useful arms than T-rex. I wouldn't say it's a stomp, but Triceratops CAN win.

Click to expand...

Size doesn't always matter, especially when you don't have the weapons to help. The Spino's arms are going to accomplish nothing; they're nowhere near as deadly as a Tyrannosaurus' jaws, and they're not designed to take on large armed dinosaurs. There really isn't anything the Spino can do to win.

Click to expand...

I guess the Spinosaurus is more aggressive via being a carnivore? And it can grip the Triceratops with it's longer arms, or use it's weight to crush the trike? Also don't T-rexes hunt Triceratops on the regular? Although maybe this fight wasn't as close as I thought. I thought the Spino could rip apart the Trike's spine with it's claws. Maybe there's someone else who could convince me that the Spino wins.

1. Being a carnivore doesn't automatically make one more aggressive. There are plenty of herbivores that are much more aggressive than carnivores. If anything, the Triceratops would be more aggressive, since it had to deal with rival Triceratops, Tyrannosaurus, and other predators in its time.

2. There is no way in hell the Spinosaurus would be able to gut the Triceratops, nor would it be able to crush the Triceratops.

3. Just because Tyrannosaurus hunted Triceratops doesn't mean the Spinosaurus could. The Spinosaurus was specialized in hunting fish, not large armed dinosaurs. Even still, Tyrannosaurus usually had to ambush Triceratops just to make a successful kill; in a head-to-head confrontation, a Spinosaurus is absolutely boned.

4. The Spino's claws are pathetic compared to the Tyrannosaurus' jaws, which the Triceratops could survive bites from. It's completely impossible for the Spino to 'rip apart the Trike's spine', especially considering its claws weren't made for taking on large dinosaurs.

Hyper_Anon · Mar 17, 2018

Size doesn't always matter, especially when you don't have the weapons to help. The Spino's arms are going to accomplish nothing; they're nowhere near as deadly as a Tyrannosaurus' jaws, and they're not designed to take on large armed dinosaurs. There really isn't anything the Spino can do to win.I guess the Spinosaurus is more aggressive via being a carnivore? And it can grip the Triceratops with it's longer arms, or use it's weight to crush the trike? Also don't T-rexes hunt Triceratops on the regular? Although maybe this fight wasn't as close as I thought. I thought the Spino could rip apart the Trike's spine with it's claws. Maybe there's someone else who could convince me that the Spino wins.
1. Being a carnivore doesn't automatically make one more aggressive. There are plenty of herbivores that are much more aggressive than carnivores. If anything, the Triceratops would be more aggressive, since it had to deal with rival Triceratops, Tyrannosaurus, and other predators in its time.

2. There is no way in hell the Spinosaurus would be able to gut the Triceratops, nor would it be able to crush the Triceratops.

3. Just because Tyrannosaurus hunted Triceratops doesn't mean the Spinosaurus could. The Spinosaurus was specialized in hunting fish, not large armed dinosaurs. Even still, Tyrannosaurus usually had to ambush Triceratops just to make a successful kill; in a head-to-head confrontation, a Spinosaurus is absolutely boned.

4. The Spino's claws are pathetic compared to the Tyrannosaurus' jaws, which the Triceratops could survive bites from. It's completely impossible for the Spino to 'rip apart the Trike's spine', especially considering its claws weren't made for taking on large dinosaurs.

1. True, I know I'm using a bad example but lions are aggressive, and it fought giraffes and elephants, which are non aggressive herbivores. But even if the spino was more aggressive, it doesn't help.

2. I said the spino could grip the triceratops with it's arms, I'm pretty sure the spino wouldn't be able to gut it unless it was knocked on the ground. And the Spino is slightly heavier by around 4 tons? Maybe less.

3. True.

4. Yeah, I said I thought the Spino could rip apart the trike's spine. But it MIGHT be able to crack or break off the horns but it might be unlikely. Guess the fight is less close than previously thought, but not a stomp. The Spino might be able to last 30 minutes.

Kiryu2012 · Mar 17, 2018

Hyper Anon said:
Size doesn't always matter, especially when you don't have the weapons to help. The Spino's arms are going to accomplish nothing; they're nowhere near as deadly as a Tyrannosaurus' jaws, and they're not designed to take on large armed dinosaurs. There really isn't anything the Spino can do to win.

I guess the Spinosaurus is more aggressive via being a carnivore? And it can grip the Triceratops with it's longer arms, or use it's weight to crush the trike? Also don't T-rexes hunt Triceratops on the regular? Although maybe this fight wasn't as close as I thought. I thought the Spino could rip apart the Trike's spine with it's claws. Maybe there's someone else who could convince me that the Spino wins.1. Being a carnivore doesn't automatically make one more aggressive. There are plenty of herbivores that are much more aggressive than carnivores. If anything, the Triceratops would be more aggressive, since it had to deal with rival Triceratops, Tyrannosaurus, and other predators in its time.
2. There is no way in hell the Spinosaurus would be able to gut the Triceratops, nor would it be able to crush the Triceratops.

3. Just because Tyrannosaurus hunted Triceratops doesn't mean the Spinosaurus could. The Spinosaurus was specialized in hunting fish, not large armed dinosaurs. Even still, Tyrannosaurus usually had to ambush Triceratops just to make a successful kill; in a head-to-head confrontation, a Spinosaurus is absolutely boned.

4. The Spino's claws are pathetic compared to the Tyrannosaurus' jaws, which the Triceratops could survive bites from. It's completely impossible for the Spino to 'rip apart the Trike's spine', especially considering its claws weren't made for taking on large dinosaurs.

1. True, I know I'm using a bad example but lions are aggressive, and it fought giraffes and elephants, which are non aggressive herbivores. But even if the spino was more aggressive, it doesn't help.

2. I said the spino could grip the triceratops with it's arms, I'm pretty sure the spino wouldn't be able to gut it unless it was knocked on the ground. And the Spino is slightly heavier by around 4 tons? Maybe less.

3. True.

4. Yeah, I said I thought the Spino could rip apart the trike's spine. Guess the fight is less close than previously thought, but not a stomp. The Spino might be able to last 30 minutes.

The Spino wouldn't able to flip over the Triceratops if that's what you're implying; it'd break its arms trying to do so, and the Triceratops would easily fight it off.

Hyper_Anon · Mar 17, 2018

Size doesn't always matter, especially when you don't have the weapons to help. The Spino's arms are going to accomplish nothing; they're nowhere near as deadly as a Tyrannosaurus' jaws, and they're not designed to take on large armed dinosaurs. There really isn't anything the Spino can do to win.I guess the Spinosaurus is more aggressive via being a carnivore? And it can grip the Triceratops with it's longer arms, or use it's weight to crush the trike? Also don't T-rexes hunt Triceratops on the regular? Although maybe this fight wasn't as close as I thought. I thought the Spino could rip apart the Trike's spine with it's claws. Maybe there's someone else who could convince me that the Spino wins.1. Being a carnivore doesn't automatically make one more aggressive. There are plenty of herbivores that are much more aggressive than carnivores. If anything, the Triceratops would be more aggressive, since it had to deal with rival Triceratops, Tyrannosaurus, and other predators in its time.
2. There is no way in hell the Spinosaurus would be able to gut the Triceratops, nor would it be able to crush the Triceratops.

3. Just because Tyrannosaurus hunted Triceratops doesn't mean the Spinosaurus could. The Spinosaurus was specialized in hunting fish, not large armed dinosaurs. Even still, Tyrannosaurus usually had to ambush Triceratops just to make a successful kill; in a head-to-head confrontation, a Spinosaurus is absolutely boned.

4. The Spino's claws are pathetic compared to the Tyrannosaurus' jaws, which the Triceratops could survive bites from. It's completely impossible for the Spino to 'rip apart the Trike's spine', especially considering its claws weren't made for taking on large dinosaurs.

1. True, I know I'm using a bad example but lions are aggressive, and it fought giraffes and elephants, which are non aggressive herbivores. But even if the spino was more aggressive, it doesn't help.

2. I said the spino could grip the triceratops with it's arms, I'm pretty sure the spino wouldn't be able to gut it unless it was knocked on the ground. And the Spino is slightly heavier by around 4 tons? Maybe less.

3. True.

4. Yeah, I said I thought the Spino could rip apart the trike's spine. Guess the fight is less close than previously thought, but not a stomp. The Spino might be able to last 30 minutes.

The Spino wouldn't able to flip over the Triceratops if that's what you're implying; it'd break its arms trying to do so, and the Triceratops would easily fight it off.

Not with it's claws, but MAYBE with it's weight, it could ram the trike. It's claws also could slice open it's neck and kill it, not sure about the other body parts of the trike, like the sides, back, etc, which tank trex bites.

Kiryu2012 · Mar 17, 2018

The Spinosaurus wouldn't be able to cut the Triceratops' neck thanks to the latter's bone frill protecting it. Ramming isn't going to accomplish anything, considering the Triceratops greater bulk and superior stability due to being a quadruped.

Hyper_Anon · Mar 17, 2018

Kiryu2012 said:
The Spinosaurus wouldn't be able to cut the Triceratops' neck thanks to the latter's bone frill protecting it. Ramming isn't going to accomplish anything, considering the Triceratops greater bulk and superior stability due to being a quadruped.

But what if the Spino slashes unprotected areas, causing it to bleed? Or bites it? Is it really that big of a stomp? I might change it so it takes place in a lake. A shallow lake.

Kiryu2012 · Mar 17, 2018

Hyper Anon said:
Kiryu2012 said:

The Spinosaurus wouldn't be able to cut the Triceratops' neck thanks to the latter's bone frill protecting it. Ramming isn't going to accomplish anything, considering the Triceratops greater bulk and superior stability due to being a quadruped.

Click to expand...

But what if the Spino slashes unprotected areas, causing it to bleed? Or bites it? Is it really that big of a stomp? I might change it so it takes place in a lake.

There really isn't any unprotected areas the Spino could hit that could seriously hurt the Triceratops; plus, the Triceratops would make damn sure to keep the Spino from getting in close to try.

If it takes place in a lake, then it's still one-sided, as the Triceratops wouldn't be able to really defend itself while also struggling to keep afloat. An animal of that size and mass, and lacking in the specializations needed, would surely have a hard time swimming and protecting itself from attack simultaneously.

Hyper_Anon · Mar 17, 2018

Kiryu2012 said:
Hyper Anon said:

Kiryu2012 said:

The Spinosaurus wouldn't be able to cut the Triceratops' neck thanks to the latter's bone frill protecting it. Ramming isn't going to accomplish anything, considering the Triceratops greater bulk and superior stability due to being a quadruped.

Click to expand...

But what if the Spino slashes unprotected areas, causing it to bleed? Or bites it? Is it really that big of a stomp? I might change it so it takes place in a lake.

Click to expand...

There really isn't any unprotected areas the Spino could hit that could seriously hurt the Triceratops; plus, the Triceratops would make damn sure to keep the Spino from getting in close to try.
If it takes place in a lake, then it's still one-sided, as the Triceratops wouldn't be able to really defend itself while also struggling to keep afloat. An animal of that size and mass, and lacking in the specializations needed, would surely have a hard time swimming and protecting itself from attack simultaneously.

Hmmm....what it the Spino bites it? Anyway let's say the fight takes starts in a shallow 5 foot lake that gets deeper. The Spinosaurus can drag the triceratops deeper in the water.

Kiryu2012 · Mar 17, 2018

Hyper Anon said:
Kiryu2012 said:

Hyper Anon said:

Kiryu2012 said:

The Spinosaurus wouldn't be able to cut the Triceratops' neck thanks to the latter's bone frill protecting it. Ramming isn't going to accomplish anything, considering the Triceratops greater bulk and superior stability due to being a quadruped.

Click to expand...

But what if the Spino slashes unprotected areas, causing it to bleed? Or bites it? Is it really that big of a stomp? I might change it so it takes place in a lake.

Click to expand...

There really isn't any unprotected areas the Spino could hit that could seriously hurt the Triceratops; plus, the Triceratops would make damn sure to keep the Spino from getting in close to try.
If it takes place in a lake, then it's still one-sided, as the Triceratops wouldn't be able to really defend itself while also struggling to keep afloat. An animal of that size and mass, and lacking in the specializations needed, would surely have a hard time swimming and protecting itself from attack simultaneously.

Click to expand...

Hmmm....what it the Spino bites it? Anyway let's say the fight takes starts in a shallow 5 foot lake that gets deeper. The Spinosaurus can drag the triceratops deeper in the water.

In that scenario, the Triceratops would still most likely win, as its large enough to keep its footing in the shallow water, while the Spino lacks the strength to pull the ceratopsian underwater.

Hyper_Anon · Mar 19, 2018

Hyper_Anon · Mar 21, 2018

Chu_Minh_Duy · Mar 22, 2018

Hyper Anon said:
Size doesn't always matter, especially when you don't have the weapons to help. The Spino's arms are going to accomplish nothing; they're nowhere near as deadly as a Tyrannosaurus' jaws, and they're not designed to take on large armed dinosaurs. There really isn't anything the Spino can do to win.

I guess the Spinosaurus is more aggressive via being a carnivore? And it can grip the Triceratops with it's longer arms, or use it's weight to crush the trike? Also don't T-rexes hunt Triceratops on the regular? Although maybe this fight wasn't as close as I thought. I thought the Spino could rip apart the Trike's spine with it's claws. Maybe there's someone else who could convince me that the Spino wins.1. Being a carnivore doesn't automatically make one more aggressive. There are plenty of herbivores that are much more aggressive than carnivores. If anything, the Triceratops would be more aggressive, since it had to deal with rival Triceratops, Tyrannosaurus, and other predators in its time.
2. There is no way in hell the Spinosaurus would be able to gut the Triceratops, nor would it be able to crush the Triceratops.

3. Just because Tyrannosaurus hunted Triceratops doesn't mean the Spinosaurus could. The Spinosaurus was specialized in hunting fish, not large armed dinosaurs. Even still, Tyrannosaurus usually had to ambush Triceratops just to make a successful kill; in a head-to-head confrontation, a Spinosaurus is absolutely boned.

4. The Spino's claws are pathetic compared to the Tyrannosaurus' jaws, which the Triceratops could survive bites from. It's completely impossible for the Spino to 'rip apart the Trike's spine', especially considering its claws weren't made for taking on large dinosaurs.

1. True, I know I'm using a bad example but lions are aggressive, and it fought giraffes and elephants, which are non aggressive herbivores. But even if the spino was more aggressive, it doesn't help.

2. I said the spino could grip the triceratops with it's arms, I'm pretty sure the spino wouldn't be able to gut it unless it was knocked on the ground. And the Spino is slightly heavier by around 4 tons? Maybe less.

3. True.

4. Yeah, I said I thought the Spino could rip apart the trike's spine. But it MIGHT be able to crack or break off the horns but it might be unlikely. Guess the fight is less close than previously thought, but not a stomp. The Spino might be able to last 30 minutes.

the horn of the Triceratops are able to tank T-rex's bite and somehow it could break or shatter T-rex's ribs or bones if he was ramming in full power so i think it didn't work well ,unless you're talking about Ark's Spino

Hyper_Anon · Mar 22, 2018

Spino: 0

Trike: 2

irl spino

Uradelbauer · Mar 24, 2018

Spinosaurus via size, strength, claws, etc. Could probably gut the herbivore. They survived attacks from Carcharadontosauruses and other Spinosaurs along with herbivores, so they aren't just a fish eater

Chu_Minh_Duy · Mar 24, 2018

CCFB said:
Spinosaurus via size, strength, claws, etc. Could probably gut the herbivore. They survived attacks from Carcharadontosauruses and other Spinosaurs along with herbivores, so they aren't just a fish eater

Trike via durability ,better armed ,strength and weight, Carcharadontosaurus are nowhere near T-rex,they just bleed other Sauropods with his bite while the Trike can kill a T-rex in 1 on 1 battle

Hyper_Anon · Mar 24, 2018

Spino: 1

Trike: 2

IDK what a "Carcharadontosaurus" is. But I highly doubt it's stronger than a T-rex.

Hyper_Anon · Mar 26, 2018

Chu_Minh_Duy · Mar 26, 2018

Hyper Anon said:
Spino: 1
Trike: 2

IDK what a "Carcharadontosaurus" is. But I highly doubt it's stronger than a T-rex.

Carcharadontosaurus just only make the prey bleed to death by their sharp teeth

Hyper_Anon · Mar 26, 2018

Chu Minh Duy said:
Hyper Anon said:

Spino: 1
Trike: 2

IDK what a "Carcharadontosaurus" is. But I highly doubt it's stronger than a T-rex.

Click to expand...

Carcharadontosaurus just only make the prey bleed to death by their sharp teeth

What is it tho?

Chu_Minh_Duy · Mar 27, 2018

Hyper Anon said:
Chu Minh Duy said:

Hyper Anon said:

Spino: 1
Trike: 2

IDK what a "Carcharadontosaurus" is. But I highly doubt it's stronger than a T-rex.

Click to expand...

Carcharadontosaurus just only make the prey bleed to death by their sharp teeth

Click to expand...

What is it tho?

it mean they just only bite the prey to make them bleed and then wait till their prey died because losing too much blood

Immeasurabledissapointment · Mar 27, 2018

Trikes evolved to contend with the likes of T rex. And as others have pointed out, just because T rex hunted Triceratops doesn't mean a spinosaurus could. Rexes were specifically adapted to hunt armored prey, that extraordinarily high bite force is for breaking through armor and bone of dinosaurs like triceratops. Spinosaurus does not have the equipment to kill the trike.

Hyper_Anon · Mar 27, 2018

Trike: 3

Spino: 1

Chu_Minh_Duy · Mar 28, 2018

Immeasurabledissapointment said:
Trikes evolved to contend with the likes of T rex. And as others have pointed out, just because T rex hunted Triceratops doesn't mean a spinosaurus could. Rexes were specifically adapted to hunt armored prey, that extraordinarily high bite force is for breaking through armor and bone of dinosaurs like triceratops. Spinosaurus does not have the equipment to kill the trike.

yeah ,but T-rex just only success by ambush the Trike or attack the old and sick Triceratops when they was alone

Kiryu2012 · Mar 28, 2018

Chu Minh Duy said:
Immeasurabledissapointment said:

Trikes evolved to contend with the likes of T rex. And as others have pointed out, just because T rex hunted Triceratops doesn't mean a spinosaurus could. Rexes were specifically adapted to hunt armored prey, that extraordinarily high bite force is for breaking through armor and bone of dinosaurs like triceratops. Spinosaurus does not have the equipment to kill the trike.

Click to expand...

yeah ,but T-rex just only success by ambush the Trike or attack the old and sick Triceratops when they was alone

Because the Triceratops was just that formidable an herbivore. Even in ambush, an animal as unskilled in hunting armoured prey as the Spinosaurus would stand no chance.

Uradelbauer · Mar 28, 2018

Well, Spinosaurus did hunt and eat hadrosaurids

Kiryu2012 · Mar 28, 2018

CCFB said:
Well, Spinosaurus did hunt and eat hadrosaurids

Which would be rare occassions compared to hunting fish and other aquatic animals, which was what Spinosaurus was specialized for. Also, those hadrosaurs were most likely young or weak individuals, and ceratopsians >>>> hadrosaurs.

Chu_Minh_Duy · Mar 28, 2018

Kiryu2012 said:
CCFB said:

Well, Spinosaurus did hunt and eat hadrosaurids

Click to expand...

Which would be rare occassions compared to hunting fish and other aquatic animals, which was what Spinosaurus was specialized for. Also, those hadrosaurs were most likely young or weak individuals, and ceratopsians >>>> hadrosaurs.op

Ceratopsians>Duck Billed dinos

Chu_Minh_Duy · Mar 28, 2018

Chu Minh Duy said:
Immeasurabledissapointment said:

Trikes evolved to contend with the likes of T rex. And as others have pointed out, just because T rex hunted Triceratops doesn't mean a spinosaurus could. Rexes were specifically adapted to hunt armored prey, that extraordinarily high bite force just is for breaking through armor and bone of dinosaurs like triceratops. Spinosaurus does not have the equipment to kill the trike.

Click to expand...

yeah ,but T-rex just only success by ambush the Trike or attack the old and sick Triceratops when they was alone

which mean the Rexes are attack the weak individuals of the Trike when they was all alone

Hyper_Anon · Apr 5, 2018

Hyper_Anon · Apr 11, 2018

Pygmy_Hippo_2 · Apr 11, 2018

Triceratops FRA.

Hyper_Anon · Apr 11, 2018

Trike: 4

Spino: 1

Hyper_Anon · Apr 12, 2018

ThyBadger · Apr 13, 2018

Triceratops wins outside of deeper water.

Spinosaurus isn't built to handle large prey items like Triceratops, and cannot fully utilize it's own kit outside of the water. Spino is slow, quadrupedal and has jaws designed for eating small fish and dinosaurs, not a shield-faced juggernaut that weighed 13 tons with horns that could be up to meter and a half long or more.

Triceratops has the defense and offensive advantage completely. It can protect it's weak spots quite well, and easily inflict a deadly blow before Spino can. Quite literally, all Trike needs to do to win is lean forwards a little bit and Spino has an impaled respritory system.

Spinosaurus wins in deeper water since Triceratops cannot utilize it's defense and offense properly and probably couldn't swim well. Spinosaurus is faster in water and can probably utilize his kit to great degrees.

Also, T.Rex vs Trike goes in favor of Trike as well especially if they are both big. Some studies suggest that Trike could run faster than Rex could and it had means to deal with Rex's bite.

In the world of dinosaurs, Triceratops is pretty underrated.

Hyper_Anon · Apr 13, 2018

Trike: 5

Spino: 1

Spino vs Trike (2 more votes)

Similar threads