Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No.Zeno Sama destroyed the timeline, which contains a number of 18 universes and each is 2-C.
Therefore, the timeline contains instantaneous transfinites of Low 2-C structures.
Shouldn't it be Low 1-C then?
noZeno Sama destroyed the timeline, which contains a number of 18 universes and each is 2-C.
Therefore, the timeline contains instantaneous transfinites of Low 2-C structures.
Shouldn't it be Low 1-C then?
Destroying 18 universes is 2-C, destroying a timeline containing 18 universes should be Low 1-C.and why do you think destroying 18 universes should be low 1-C?
Destroying a timeline with 18 infinite universes doesn't make you low 1-C. Infinity is gradual from 4D onwards.Destroying 18 universes is 2-C, destroying a timeline containing 18 universes should be Low 1-C.
size? You're not telling me it's 5d to destroy something made up of 4D objects, right?The timelines created by time travel in DB are constructed from 4D objects, they should be low 1-C in size.
No, I’m saying a timeline in which the cross section is 4D objects instead of 3D will have low 1-C size as opposed to traditional low 2-C.size? You're not telling me it's 5d to destroy something made up of 4D objects, right?
The timeline is past, present and future, which means it has copies of the 18 universes at each point in time, which are transfinite.That is not how it works, being a timeline containing multiple timelines alone does not make it tier 1 sized. It contains less than 1001 so it's simply 2-C.
If the structure itself contains 4D transfinite constructions, according to the wiki it is considered a 5D structure.size? You're not telling me it's 5d to destroy something made up of 4D objects, right?
As far as I can see, in that particular thread there has not been adequate discussion on the low 1-C due to the other topics and the derailment.Basically, the argument here is that the DB "timeline" contains 12 4D Space Time (low 2-C/2-C structures, now accepted as such on the wiki individually) in a larger hypertime, since they all stay on the timeline, explicitly separate spacetimes by themselves, and everything is effected when multiplied. The problem with the DontTalk example is that it is modeling the Universes as three dimensional in the case that they are spanned by a single time dimension, but in reality the Universes themselves already have a time dimension, the additional one that spans them all would be an additional fifth dimension, and in this case temporal, which is treated as uncountably infinite. So I still agree with the OP, unless you want to argue that every Universe is a 3-A structure,
So the DB has the possibility of being low 1-C, I didn't know about these things, I don't understand anything about Tier 1, I think that simple things make me much better on the ground.
aren't you a connoisseur for tier 1 GoW ?Honestly, I have no ******* idea anymore what entails for Tier 1.
Not for Norse GoW, no.aren't you a connoisseur for tier 1 GoW ?
It's possible? Like, how do you prove that the timeline is low 1-C? Is enough evidence needed?the whole idea behind multiverses as a large timeline being low 1-C was rejected in general from what i recall, so you need a CRT to have that idea accepted before applying it to dragon ball
I assume you would need the standard multiverse within the timeline to be 5-D or 6-D.It's possible? Like, how do you prove that the timeline is low 1-C? Is enough evidence needed?
Jeez, this is impossible, I understand absolutely nothing about tier 1I assume you would need the standard multiverse within the timeline to be 5-D or 6-D.
AFAIK you only need to prove there’s an overarching timeline (which DB has)the whole idea behind multiverses as a large timeline being low 1-C was rejected in general from what i recall, so you need a CRT to have that idea accepted before applying it to dragon ball
theres countless timelines btwDestroying a timeline with 18 infinite universes doesn't make you low 1-C. Infinity is gradual from 4D onwards.
Even if you destroy an infinite timeline containing 18 infinite universes, what you can become is only 2-A. And there are 7 timelines in verse DB.
in any case low 1-C is impossible
You need to prove that the "time" of a timeline is encompassing structures low 2-C 3 spatial dimensions + 1 temporal which would make a low 1-C timeline with 3 spatial dimensions + 2 temporal dimensions (5D)Jeez, this is impossible, I understand absolutely nothing about tier 1
That would be impossible, DB doesn't have much information about it.You need to prove that the "time" of a timeline is encompassing structures low 2-C 3 spatial dimensions + 1 temporal which would make a low 1-C timeline with 3 spatial dimensions + 2 temporal dimensions (5D)
Time travel doesn’t create a new universe, it creates a whole new multiverse.That would be impossible, DB doesn't have much information about it.
Well, the fact that it is a timeline already tends to lead to this interpretation, and since each universe is already accepted as having its own space and time, and a timeline is spanning these universes it makes the existence of multiple temporal dimensions kind of blatantThat would be impossible, DB doesn't have much information about it.
Time travel doesn’t create a new universe, it creates a whole new multiverse.
that’s a pretty huge indicator of a second temporal dimension, especially given each universe is a 2-C structure.
A lot in my head, I don't understand anything about level 1, but if I talk about level 2 then it's up to me, but anyway all Universes are separated by space-time and they are considered 2-C each, until it does It makes sense to be low 1-C the timeline with a small multiverse of 18 Universes.Well, the fact that it is a timeline already tends to lead to this interpretation, and since each universe is already accepted as having its own space and time, and a timeline is spanning these universes it makes the existence of multiple temporal dimensions kind of blatant
I agree, but I think zamasu could also scale to 2-A , as it was merging with parts of a timeline that would be an infinite and uncountable amount of 4D dimensions , it's the same logic we use to high 3-A for characters capable of destroying a time part of a low 2-C structureIf someone experienced tries this, I think it will go ahead, but only a few characters scale this, like Zen'ō and Super Shenron
I'm glad to know that it's possible to upgrade infinite Zamasu even more, he's one of my favorite characters (even if he only appeared for a short time)I agree, but I think zamasu could also scale to 2-A , as it was merging with parts of a timeline that would be an infinite and uncountable amount of 4D dimensions , it's the same logic we use to high 3-A for characters capable of destroying a time part of a low 2-C structure
How is he fusing with a finite number of space times 2-A?I agree, but I think zamasu could also scale to 2-A , as it was merging with parts of a timeline that would be an infinite and uncountable amount of 4D dimensions , it's the same logic we use to high 3-A for characters capable of destroying a time part of a low 2-C structure
Technically yes.so the timeline has 2 temporal dimensions? Isnt that low 1-C
No? What?so the timeline has 2 temporal dimensions? Isnt that low 1-C
well thats what im getting from this thread, 2 temporal and 3 spatialNo? What?
Nope, you need to prove those temporal dimensions are qualitatively superiorwell thats what im getting from this thread, 2 temporal and 3 spatial