Yogiri tries to kill a lizard

[Bobsican]

Speed not equalized

Yogiri Takatou: 0

SCP-682: 0

Incon: 0

 

[Oliver_de_jesus]

Well depends on SCP-343's curse use the high ball (low 1-C God cursing Scp-682) or the low ball (2-A God cursing Scp-682)

 

[Bobsican]

The latter would be an stomp, wouldn't it? Per SBA the former would be the case here by default.

 

[Oliver_de_jesus]

not necessarily, yogiri could incapacitate scp-682 leaving it in a constant state of death and resurrection due to what he heard from the ID as it is passive

but better wait for more supporter

 

[Oliver_de_jesus]

oh i realized yogiri got acausality 5 so this may be a stomp or so i think

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Yogiri's death hax cant bypass 682's immortality

 

[WeeklyBattles]

not necessarily, yogiri could incapacitate scp-682 leaving it in a constant state of death and resurrection due to what he heard from the ID as it is passive

Dont see how that would do anything seeing as 682 can already directly control whether its alive or dead anyways

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

I believe Bobsican is using the 2-A end of 343, so Yogiri can bypass the immortality

Being alive or dead doesnt really save from the incap unless Im missing something

 

[WeeklyBattles]

343's 2-A is borderline Low 1-C

682's ability to control whether its alive or dead allowed it to escape an SCP with the same ability locking it in a loop of dying

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

Which is still not Low 1-C

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Which is still not Low 1-C

Its higher than Yogiri can bypass

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

Thats not how 4-D works

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Actually no 343 IS Low 1-C so yeah Yogurt def cant bypass 682's immortality

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

Bob is using the 2-A end

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Thats not how 4-D works

I mean yeah that is kinda how 4-D works, not all 4-D beings are the same level of power

But 682's immortality is 5-D so Yogiri cant bypass it regardless

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Bob is using the 2-A end

2-A 682 has Low 1-C immortality

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

Bob is using the 2-A end of 343, which is where said immortality comes from

 

[Bobsican]

Okay, the 2-A end is used, for argument's sake for now.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

SCP-343

SCP-343 is a male, seemingly race-less, humanoid in appearance with apparent omnipotence. SCP-343 was discovered walking the streets of Prague and detained after a staff member witnessed him disappear from the streets and reappear on a rooftop. SCP-343 is detained willingly in his chamber, as...

vsbattles.fandom.com

343 is Low 1-C so...

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

SCP-343

SCP-343 is a male, seemingly race-less, humanoid in appearance with apparent omnipotence. SCP-343 was discovered walking the streets of Prague and detained after a staff member witnessed him disappear from the streets and reappear on a rooftop. SCP-343 is detained willingly in his chamber, as...

vsbattles.fandom.com

343 is Low 1-C so...

He has a 2-A end, which is the one Bob is using

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Okay, the 2-A end is used, for argument's sake for now.

hThat is against the rules, you cannot limit the tier of a charactr who isnt even in the match

 

[Bobsican]

That's allowed if such a tier is actually on the profile, tho, and 2-A is clearly there as the lower end.
We went a while ago over how stats/powers with "Possybly/Likely" around can be restricted while keeping the match allowed for indexing.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

That's allowed if such a tier is actually on the profile, tho, and 2-A is clearly there as the lower end.

Its not allowed because the character is not in the thread in the first place, if anything it is simply bias, articifially altering the tiers to try to force a loss

 

[Bobsican]

We went a while ago over how stats/powers with "Possibly/Likely" around can be restricted while keeping the match allowed for indexing.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

We went a while ago over how stats/powers with "Possybly/Likely" around can be restricted while keeping the match allowed for indexing.

Link? I would like to wholeheartedly argue against that as that is frankly a stupid af rule

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Under that kind of rule a character who gets immortality from an 'Unknown, possibly/likely X Tier' can be argued as their immortality just being unknown and thus getting stomped by characters they shouldnt

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Anyways, Yogiri still cant bypass 682's immortality as it is exponentially higher than what Yogiri can affect so whether your using 2-A or Low 1-C 343 doesnt really change much, Yogiri still cant death hax

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

He can if we use the 2-A end. You are either 4-D or 5-D, there is no in-between

 

[YungManzi]

Okay, is the argument for 682 that it can come back from instant death or is it resisting it?

If it's the former, you kinda need a lot of specific shit to function after getting hit by instant death. Immortality or regen doesn't help much.


682 also requires the ability to interact with type 5 acasuals, which is also a super specific and rare ability.

 

[Bobsican]

Link? I would like to wholeheartedly argue against that as that is frankly a stupid af rule

Here, it seems it didn't conclude yet, so feel free to discuss

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Okay hold up is this the thread? Bcause the general consensus is to not allow the exclusion of possibly/likely tiers

 

[WeeklyBattles]

He can if we use the 2-A end. You are either 4-D or 5-D, there is no in-between

343 is still magnitudes more powerful than people stronger than Yogiri in 2-A

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Okay, is the argument for 682 that it can come back from instant death or is it resisting it?

If it's the former, you kinda need a lot of specific shit to function after getting hit by instant death. Immortality or regen doesn't help much.

682 also requires the ability to interact with type 5 acasuals, which is also a super specific and rare ability.

Both, and 682 has shown the ability to come back from death hax numerous times on top of having 2-A immortality far beyond what Yogiri is capable of with his hax

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

343 is still magnitudes more powerful than people stronger than Yogiri in 2-A

Dura neg

 

[YungManzi]

Not What I'm saying; see the thing is that even if you can come back or regenerate from instant death, the thing that got hit by instant death would still not be functional.

And I don't think the death manipulation or conceptual manipulation resistance described on 682's page suggests it can resist instant death.

So I vote Yogiri for those reasons.

 

[Bobsican]

Okay hold up is this the thread? Bcause the general consensus is to not allow the exclusion of possibly/likely tiers

Note that that's by default, the OP can still manually restrict them so SBA doesn't take priority on the specified regards.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Dura neg

343's dura neg is beyond anything Yogiri can do and 682 has immortality from it

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Not What I'm saying; see the thing is that even if you can come back or regenerate from instant death, the thing that got hit by instant death would still not be functional.

And I don't think the death manipulation or conceptual manipulation resistance described on 682's page suggests it can resist instant death.

So I vote Yogiri for those reasons.

Thing is, 682's immortality allows it to bypass death hax that shut down things on a conceptual level at a level far beyond Yogiri's Instant Death hax

The reasons being...?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Note that that's by default, the OP can still manually restrict them so SBA doesn't take priority on the specified regards.

Going by that thread its looking to ban that restriction entirely

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

343's dura neg is beyond anything Yogiri can do and 682 has immortality from it

Ok? He doesnt have resistance to death hax, so him having dura neg is irrelevant