Would this be High 2-A or High 1-B?

[Metal875]

"High Multiverse level+: Characters who are 5-dimensional, and/or can destroy and/or create 5-dimensional space-time constructs of a not insignificant size. Characters who can destroy and/or create an uncountably infinite numbers of universes may potentially also be assigned this tier, as their geometrical 5-D size can be higher than 0."

Now, say we have this multiverse... it's a finite number of infinite-sized universes. All the inhabitants from those universes dream, contributing "dream universes" to a set place. But every atom in those universes are sentient and dream as well... so, infinite atoms are dreaming, creating infinite 4-D space-times. Once it creates those infinite dream universes, it creates infinite more atoms which continuously dream and create infinite more universes.

Infinite => Infinite Infinities => Infinite Infinite Infinities => Infinite Infinite Infinite Infinities...

It just endlessly keeps going. It seems to qualify under "uncountable infinity" once you get an infinite set of infinities, but then it keeps cloning those infinite sets of infinities and creating more infinite sets of infinite sets of infinities, infinitely.

Is this supposed to be High 2-A? Or High 1-B? Because if it infinitely continues to create uncountable infinities, then it would continuously jump dimensional tiers infinitely. It seems like High 1-B, but am I right on this?

 

[Dziga]

Infinity Ôëá Transcending Dimensions.

 

[Metal875]

No. Look at the quote; destroying an uncountable infinite amount of universes (infinite set of infinity) can warrant the tier. If you endlessly multiply 4-D universes, it only makes sense you'd surpass it.

But I want to know if this would just infinitely continue.

 

[Dziga]

Again, Infinity Ôëá Transcending Dimensions. Destroying an Infinity of Infinite 4D Universes CAN warrant because their geometrical shape CAN be 5D. Unless you get evidence that these universes are bound by 5 Dimensions, it counts as 2-A, with evidence of a 5th dimension, High 2-A. High 1-B is completely out of question since none of these imply creating Infinite Dimensions.

 

[Metal875]

That seems rather counter-intuitive. Obviously if there's evidence of it being 5-D, it's gonna be High 2-A. Why even add that last part if it's literally just a reiteration of the last sentence?