The Touhou Wiki pages say something similar, but they themselves edited the ages on the Touhou Wiki as well. It simply said "at least thousands" before.
We should probably ban them then. For how long though?
Shouldn't we take this to RVT?We should probably ban them then. For how long though?
Yes. It seems like harmless gradual profile creation, but it is better to prepare it in a sandbox of course.
You can do so if you wish, as we might receive more input there, but it is a wiki-editing transgression, so it probably belongs better here.
I'd normally be loathe to ban someone for something about character ages, and it might not even be untrue, but their attitude just doesn't seem good. Dismissiveness and passive-aggressiveness towards Twilight-OP, citing something they themselves wrote as their source, and doing so in a condescending "appeal to authority" kind of way, no less...We should probably ban them then. For how long though?
All good. I agree with you. I understood their intent and idea, but obviously they still shouldn't do it. A warning seems well and truly sufficient here.It was just a key without any statistics belonging to it, so it was still inappropriate, but not very serious.
I gave a warning.
PurgeDude
vsbattles.fandom.com
Well, maybe a warning to stop and follow our rules or get banned is sufficient?
Maybe. I guess they don't have to be banned outright. I just think the disrespect of Twilight-OP coupled with citing their own edits as an authority is a bad sign.Well, maybe a warning to stop and follow our rules or get banned is sufficient?
That all happened before they spoke with me directly on Discord. The rollback was also reverted before they contacted me there, where I explained that they should revert things back to their previous state and then join the forum to discuss changes in the verse thread before making edits. They were actually very polite and understanding about it. I think they simply forgot to fix it, and since I’ve been dealing with internet issues over the past few days, I wasn’t able to revert everything myself at the time. Even posting this message is taking me a long while. My apologies for not clarifying earlier. That said, I do think the ban is fair, given their behavior of altering other wikis just to justify edits on ours.
Okay, so they do intend to join and help out. That's good, although I can't say I trust them.
No problem. You work hard and well here, and internet and real life problems happen. Hard to believe as it may seem, the dog really can eat the router, as they say.
Sadly, yes. I think a stern warning at bare minimum, although if they're genuinely trying to do right then maybe no need for a ban outright.
They had their acc rejected, so I told them to contact ant on his msg wall, which they did. So yeah.
That works too.
I blocked them for a year.
Well isn’t the cooldown (lmao) for bumping at least 24 hours? It seems like he’s abiding by that rule if you look at the timestamps of all his bumps. Is it desperate? Sure, but I don’t think that warrants a warning. Although staff may see it differently.
They've bumped 3 times within 8 hours on Sept 12, 6 times within 12 hours on Sept 13, 3 times within a minute on Sept 16, and 6 times again within 4 hours on Sept 18. I'd probably tell them to stop it, but hey that's just me.
Sent a warning to both of them. Striking similarity in the revisions, so could they be the same person?
Seems possible to me
That suggestive name might also warrant some disciplinary action.
A user added a whole bunch of stuff to this profile without a CRTI think that warnings are likely sufficient for now, especially as Dinosaur thailand seemed reasonable after they were reprimanded.
This is not a one time thing for Thailand either
I will give them a warning.
vsbattles.fandom.com
Isn't Skibidi a name referring to toilets? Doesn't look good next to their existing offenses. Oh well, we'll see.Since the vandal did not stop after my previous warning, I blocked them for 3 months, to give them the time to learn our rules.
AkikoSkibidi
